On 02/25/2011 01:18 AM, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
> On 2/25/2011 2:03 AM, Paul Johnson wrote:
>> On 02/24/2011 07:52 PM, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
>>> On 2/24/2011 8:16 PM, Paul Johnson wrote:
Until you're
actually in the Tri-Cities area, it's rare to see official signage
actually point
On 2/25/2011 2:03 AM, Paul Johnson wrote:
On 02/24/2011 07:52 PM, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
On 2/24/2011 8:16 PM, Paul Johnson wrote:
Until you're
actually in the Tri-Cities area, it's rare to see official signage
actually point out any of the three cities involved independently,
Have signs cha
On 02/24/2011 07:52 PM, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
> On 2/24/2011 8:16 PM, Paul Johnson wrote:
>> Until you're
>> actually in the Tri-Cities area, it's rare to see official signage
>> actually point out any of the three cities involved independently,
>
> Have signs changed recently? On the photos on
On 2/24/2011 8:16 PM, Paul Johnson wrote:
Until you're
actually in the Tri-Cities area, it's rare to see official signage
actually point out any of the three cities involved independently,
Have signs changed recently? On the photos on
http://www.interstate-guide.com/i-082.html I see Kennewick
On 02/24/2011 07:58 AM, McGuire, Matthew wrote:
> Without knowing the area, I can only speculate that "Tri-Cities" is a locally
> common name for the entire metro, but assuming it is, I like the way it looks
> on Mapnik, so it seems like a case of tagging for the renderer. How about
> "place=me
On 2/24/11 11:01 AM, Toby Murray wrote:
Seems like out here in Kansas/Nebraska a lot of cities are a member of
some "tri-city" region but I think it is almost always made up by the
local weather man who just wants a quick way to refer to "this area
here" while pointing at his magic green screen.
On 2/24/2011 11:08 AM, Brad Neuhauser wrote:
Another example is the Quad Cities in Illinois/Iowa:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quad_Cities
Those same 4 cities also participate in an agglomeration known as the
"Quint Cities". As someone else noted, I hope this doesn't render on
the default
oss the state line,
> administratively it is two cities, namely Bristol, Tennessee and Bristol,
> Virginia.
> >
> > ---Original Email---
> > Subject :Re: [Talk-us] place=city name=Tri-Cities
> > From :mailto:jumba...@gmail.com
> > Date :Thu Feb 24 08:1
ristol,
> Virginia.
>
> ---Original Email---
> Subject :Re: [Talk-us] place=city name=Tri-Cities
> From :mailto:jumba...@gmail.com
> Date :Thu Feb 24 08:19:55 America/Chicago 2011
>
>
> Officially, there are the Census Metropolitan Statistical Areas, which are
>
,
administratively it is two cities, namely Bristol, Tennessee and Bristol,
Virginia.
---Original Email---
Subject :Re: [Talk-us] place=city name=Tri-Cities
>From :mailto:jumba...@gmail.com
Date :Thu Feb 24 08:19:55 America/Chicago 2011
Officially, there are the Census Metropolitan Statisti
ions would allow
> that - if the renderer so chose.
>
> Matt
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Nathan Edgars II [mailto:nerou...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2011 10:07 PM
> To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools; OpenStreetMap talk
ednesday, February 23, 2011 10:07 PM
To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools; OpenStreetMap talk-us list
Subject: [Talk-us] place=city name=Tri-Cities
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/876536239
There's no city named Tri-Cities; this is the name of the metropolitan
area that c
On Wednesday, February 23, 2011 09:06:31 PM Nathan Edgars II wrote:
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/876536239
> There's no city named Tri-Cities; this is the name of the metropolitan
> area that comprises Pasco, Kennewick, and Richland. I assume there's no
> defensible reason to keep i
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/876536239
There's no city named Tri-Cities; this is the name of the metropolitan
area that comprises Pasco, Kennewick, and Richland. I assume there's no
defensible reason to keep it tagged as such, but what should be done
about it?
14 matches
Mail list logo
