Matthew Schneider wrote:
> Adam Schreiber wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 9:45 PM, Richard Weait
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Dear Can-Americans,
>>>
>>> This is silly. Four different lines for one border.
>>>
>>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=48.99906&lon=-95.15362&zoom=16&layers=B000FTF
>>>
>>> W
On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 21:01:59 -0500
Matthew Schneider wrote:
> I know some of my friends in Northern Minnesota are wacky, but roads
> in the middle of a lake? I didn't know we'd started mapping seasonal
> ice roads. Looks like a TIGER mix-up.
>
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=49.3146&lon=-94.
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 10:15 AM, Adam Schreiber wrote:
>
> A faster way of doing this might be if the person that did the county
> borders saved their .osm files from that import, then the saved .osm
> files from the state lines could be overlayed and fixes made.
>
I saved some of the imports,
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 10:45 AM, Ted Mielczarek
wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 9:45 PM, Richard Weait wrote:
>>
>> Dear Can-Americans,
>>
>> This is silly. Four different lines for one border.
>>
>>
>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=48.99906&lon=-95.15362&zoom=16&layers=B000FTF
>>
>> We're
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 9:45 PM, Richard Weait wrote:
> Dear Can-Americans,
>
> This is silly. Four different lines for one border.
>
>
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=48.99906&lon=-95.15362&zoom=16&layers=B000FTF
>
> We're good neighbo(u)rs. We should fix our fence. Shouldn't each
> borde
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 9:01 PM, Matthew Schneider <
mlschnei...@bucketofbolts.net> wrote:
> I know some of my friends in Northern Minnesota are wacky, but roads in
> the middle of a lake? I didn't know we'd started mapping seasonal ice
> roads.
> Looks like a TIGER mix-up.
>
>
> http://www.openst
Forwarded Message
> From: Richard Weait
> To: Bill Ricker
> Subject: Re: [Talk-us] silly borders
> Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:30:47 -0400
>
> On Mon, 2009-03-30 at 22:07 -0400, Bill Ricker wrote:
> > > We should fix our fence.
> >
> > A
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 10:13 PM, Matthew Schneider
wrote:
>> Great. Which one's correct?
looks to me like they were traced with subtly different projections
that supposedly were squared up but didn't quite fit.
E.g., Interesting factoid i just picked up - Warsaw Pact and NATO used
the same pri
Someone get the text to the Treaty of 1818 and figure that one out... I
don't seem to have my copy ready by my computer.
--
James Fee
http://www.spatiallyadjusted.com/
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 7:07 PM, Bill Ricker wrote:
> > We should fix our fence.
>
> Ayuh. Good fences make good naaybahs. [
Adam Schreiber wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 9:45 PM, Richard Weait wrote:
>
>> Dear Can-Americans,
>>
>> This is silly. Four different lines for one border.
>>
>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=48.99906&lon=-95.15362&zoom=16&layers=B000FTF
>>
>> We're good neighbo(u)rs. We should fix o
> We should fix our fence.
Ayuh. Good fences make good naaybahs. [1]
> Shouldn't each
> border be a single way, with a relation for each adjacent region?
around whom does it go clockwise?
Shouldn't the entirety of a country's (state/province/county) be a
(multi)polygon for area?
Can that be em
I know some of my friends in Northern Minnesota are wacky, but roads in
the middle of a lake? I didn't know we'd started mapping seasonal ice roads.
Looks like a TIGER mix-up.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=49.3146&lon=-94.8657&zoom=14&layers=B000FTFT
Richard Weait wrote:
> Dear Can-Americans
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 9:45 PM, Richard Weait wrote:
> Dear Can-Americans,
>
> This is silly. Four different lines for one border.
>
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=48.99906&lon=-95.15362&zoom=16&layers=B000FTF
>
> We're good neighbo(u)rs. We should fix our fence. Shouldn't each
> border b
Dear Can-Americans,
This is silly. Four different lines for one border.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=48.99906&lon=-95.15362&zoom=16&layers=B000FTF
We're good neighbo(u)rs. We should fix our fence. Shouldn't each
border be a single way, with a relation for each adjacent region?
We
14 matches
Mail list logo