Re: [Talk-us] what happened to Sacramento?

On 9/30/15 12:47 PM, Ray Kiddy wrote: > Wow. I have not gotten to the point, in my mapping adventures, where I > have had to look at changesets like this. A new thing to learn. > > Thanks for the reverts. I will get to fixing the rest of that soon. > > you may want to look to newer TIGER boundary

Re: [Talk-us] what happened to Sacramento?

On Tue, 29 Sep 2015 22:12:52 + (UTC) Minh Nguyen wrote: > Jack Burke writes: > > > > > You're not crazy. Just using the regular OSM website interface, I > > can find > the city node, and the county boundary, but not a city boundary. > AFAICT, it

Re: [Talk-us] what happened to Sacramento?

Jack Burke writes: > > You're not crazy. Just using the regular OSM website interface, I can find the city node, and the county boundary, but not a city boundary. AFAICT, it isn't a consolidated city-County, so it should exist. Looks like the original TIGER boundary way got

Re: [Talk-us] what happened to Sacramento?

You're not crazy. Just using the regular OSM website interface, I can find the city node, and the county boundary, but not a city boundary. AFAICT, it isn't a consolidated city-County, so it should exist. -jack On September 29, 2015 5:10:25 PM EDT, Ray Kiddy wrote: > >I

[Talk-us] what happened to Sacramento?

I have been fixing up boundaries of cities in California and I have found something odd. Where is the city of Sacramento? There is a city there. There is a county. The county boundaries are at http://openstreetmap.org/relation/396460 and that all looks good. And it is not a county/city hybrid

Re: [Talk-us] what happened to Sacramento?

I just like the surprise way in which the issue was resolved. Good work all around! -- SEJ -- twitter: @geomantic -- skype: sejohnson8 There are two types of people in the world. Those that can extrapolate from incomplete data. On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 6:12 PM, Minh Nguyen