Re: [Talk-us] Functional Classification question in the Kansas City area

2017-09-23 Thread Max Erickson
Given that the HFCS can simply be added as another tag, I don't see any reason to force OSM tagging away from what is sensible just to line up with what the state says. Max ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org

[Talk-us] Functional Classification question in the Kansas City area

2017-09-23 Thread Joseph Barnes
Hello all, So for the past few months, user UAN51 (I've invited him to join this thread) has been applying MODOT's Highway Functional Classification System (HFCS) to primary and lower roads in the KCMO area. This has led to some things (like part of US 169 and US 69 being secondary roads, MO

Re: [Talk-us] Functional Classification question in the Kansas City area

2017-09-23 Thread Paul Johnson
On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 9:53 AM, Max Erickson wrote: > Given that the HFCS can simply be added as another tag, I don't see > any reason to force OSM tagging away from what is sensible just to > line up with what the state says. > This. If the HFCS is known, add that in a