Re: [Talk-us] Population during mandatory evacuations

Richard Fairhurst writes: > Minh Nguyen wrote: >> Following some discussion about this changeset in OSMUS >> Slack [2], I started a discussion on the wiki about preferring >> more stable population figures over supposition about >> temporary circumstances. [3] > > It's roughly analogous to a

Re: [Talk-us] Population during mandatory evacuations

Minh Nguyen wrote: > Following some discussion about this changeset in OSMUS > Slack [2], I started a discussion on the wiki about preferring > more stable population figures over supposition about > temporary circumstances. [3] It's roughly analogous to a situation we had a few months ago

Re: [Talk-us] Population during mandatory evacuations

Minh Nguyen writes: > (Crossposted to the talk-us and tagging lists.) > > Due to the ongoing Camp Fire in Northern California [1], the place POI > for the town of Paradise got tagged with population=0 before the > change was reverted. Following some discussion about this changeset in > OSMUS

[Talk-us] Population during mandatory evacuations

(Crossposted to the talk-us and tagging lists.) Due to the ongoing Camp Fire in Northern California [1], the place POI for the town of Paradise got tagged with population=0 before the change was reverted. Following some discussion about this changeset in OSMUS Slack [2], I started a