Thanks.
On 16 May 2013 21:24, Glen Wilson <1tinsh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm also leaning towards the cd:ngi imagery because of more generally
> consistant alignment. Whatever your preference, it's still a good idea to
> check the alignment with (good quality) GPS traces (if available).
>
> I ha
I'm also leaning towards the cd:ngi imagery because of more generally
consistant alignment. Whatever your preference, it's still a good idea to
check the alignment with (good quality) GPS traces (if available).
I have found having multiple sources available is useful for comparison
(e.g. that lake
Hi
The CD:NGI is likely to be more accurate in terms of alignment but Grant
might correct me on this. CD:NGI is also the only source with 50cm
resolution for the whole of South Africa. Bing does not have the same
resolution across the whole of South Africa. With regards to currentness,
that varies
I have noticed there is an offset between the Bing and CD:NGI imagery.
Which of these are people using as a basemap or is it a question of which
is more recent / better resolution?
Sindile
___
Talk-ZA mailing list
Talk-ZA@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.
4 matches
Mail list logo