Hello,

Just to let everyone know, in the absence of any other options, I'll be reverting these in the next day or so.

For completeness there are two user accounts - one for the changeset I mentioned below and also one I got in touch via https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5046 .

I've had a look at a sample of both users' edits, and unfortunately a full revert followed by a review of those changes does seem the best way forward - it'll restore lane information and turn relations, and also undo other problem merges such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/10632491 .

Best Regards,

Andy


On 16/05/2021 11:51, Gerhardus Geldenhuis wrote:
Hi
I would say revert the changeset made by the user. There has up to date been no reply to the changeset discussion by the user in question so based on lack of engagement I would say that is the best course of action currently for preserving data integrity.

Regards

On Sat, 15 May 2021 at 18:37, Andy Townsend <ajt1...@gmail.com <mailto:ajt1...@gmail.com>> wrote:

    Hello,

    Andy from OpenStreetMap's Data Working Group here.

    A relatively new mapper has merged a number of roads together
    which has
    caused a few problems - one is that some turn restrictions now don't
    make a lot of sense, another is that where detailed tagging had been
    added to part of a road, it has now been applied in error to the
    whole
    road (likely incorrectly).

    There's no suggestion that these edits were made in anything other
    than
    good faith, of course - just that they have caused unanticipated
    problems.

    Currently, we're trying to figure out the best way to resolve things.
    I've commented at
    https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/104256975
    <https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/104256975> to
    ask both the original mapper and someone who's noticed the problem
    what
    they think is the best way forward.  There are a couple of ways
    forward:

    1) One possibility is to fix everything manually, but as there are
    over
    1000 changesets to look at, that's a lot of work (and more than
    the DWG
    would be able to do on their own). Some problems have already been
    fixed
    by other mappers.

    2) Another option is to revert all changesets and look at what has
    been
    lost, and then re-apply those. Some manual work would also be
    needed to
    look at things that have changed since these edits.

    3) A third option would be like (2) but starting at a later date.

    I'm asking on this list as well to try and find out what people think
    would be the best way forward.  We'll hold off doing anything for
    a week
    or so to let everyone discuss the best way forward.

    Best Regards,
    Andy("SomeoneElse" in OSM)



    _______________________________________________
    Talk-ZA mailing list
    Talk-ZA@openstreetmap.org <mailto:Talk-ZA@openstreetmap.org>
    https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-za
    <https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-za>

--
Gerhardus Geldenhuis

_______________________________________________
Talk-ZA mailing list
Talk-ZA@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-za
_______________________________________________
Talk-ZA mailing list
Talk-ZA@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-za

Reply via email to