I proposed some time ago to fix some surface values.
Edit is documented at
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mechanical_Edits/Mateusz_Konieczny_-_bot_account/fixing_malformed_surface_tags
I propose to expand this by fixing also values listed below.
Please comment if any of proposed
Hi,
I was just curious to look at the OSM map for Manila from 2007 when I started
mapping. Is there a way to display this? Some sort of OSM time-machine?
I looked around but didn't find anything useful, except for someone suggesting
to take a planet dump from that time, and render it in my
On Wed, Nov 1, 2023 at 2:05 PM Jim Morgan wrote:
> I was just curious to look at the OSM map for Manila from 2007 when I
> started mapping. Is there a way to display this? Some sort of OSM
> time-machine?
>
> I looked around but didn't find anything useful, except for someone
> suggesting to
West Midlands Fire Service announced a new "Risk Explorer" web service
[1] today; it is clearly based on OSM map data, but I can see no
attribution,
I have pointed this requirement out to them on Twitter [2] and await
their response.
The site was built by a company called "Shoothill" [3].
[1]
Andy wrote:
> West Midlands Fire Service announced a new "Risk Explorer" web
> service
> [1] today; it is clearly based on OSM map data, but I can see no
> attribution,
>
> I have pointed this requirement out to them on Twitter [2] and
await
> their response.
>
> The site was built by a company
My two cents.
Our forum and Discord require "accounts" to be registered at the OSM level (via
OAuth2 by registering for a volunteer Contributor account to OSM) and at "the
Discord level," something else again. A mailing list "merely" requires an
email address as an "account" to be registered
Due to the structure of OSM, we don't have a single "Liaison Officer", so
it's best if they join the list here and join the community discussion. I'm
happy to engage directly with them if they prefer a single point of
contact, but I'd need to stress that no single person is an authority
within OSM
In the context of the tracks, there is always the risk that if you delete
something that you don't think should be there, that someone else re-maps
it because they see it in the aerial photo. (As we discussed.)
I guess the best is that we could detail a preferred approach (e.g. in
Australian
DWG have received a
"*Request for a Liaison Officer*:
To enhance the accuracy of OpenStreetMap data pertaining to the NSW
National Parks and Wildlife Service"
This has come up in regard to tracks that they say they have previously
requested be deleted (I'm contacting them to confirm just which?)
Hi Folks,
Personally I think its best if they do become editors as well as
mailing/forum/discord participants. It's the best way to learn the ecosystem
and I have no doubt that their data group will have some GIS knowledge etc
so it wont be too onerous on them to participate.
The difficulty is
On Thu, 2 Nov 2023 at 16:35, Graeme Fitzpatrick
wrote:
> Tried a test message from an outside e-mail but doesn't seem to have come
> through.
>
> Do you have to be subscribed to the list to be able to post to it?
>
Yes
___
Talk-au mailing list
Thanks everybody for your thoughts.
As per Steve's comment, here is probably the easiest contact point due to
not needing an account, but we'll see what other suggestions are made?
I was wondering if a general OSM-AU / OSM-Oceania e-mail address, probably
as part of OSGeo, would help with this
Tried a test message from an outside e-mail but doesn't seem to have come
through.
Do you have to be subscribed to the list to be able to post to it?
Thanks
Graeme
On Thu, 2 Nov 2023 at 15:02, Phil Wyatt wrote:
> Lots of the detail is there already
>
>
>
>
>
Lots of the detail is there already
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Cycling_and_Foot_Paths
Never know, they might even get to like mapping and start adding lots more
detail like “operator” to existing tacks and notes to those under rehabilitation
14 matches
Mail list logo
