The weekly round-up of OSM news, issue # 707,
is now available online in English, giving as always a summary of a lot of
things happening in the openstreetmap world:
https://www.weeklyosm.eu/archives/17032
Enjoy!
Did you know that you can also submit messages for the weeklyOSM? Just log in
In that case, should I go ahead now with the revert?
Mark P.
> On 9 Feb 2024, at 6:23 am, fors...@ozonline.com.au wrote:
>
> No, nothing that I have heard.
> Tony
>
>
>> Just following up on this - has there been any further input from National
>> Parks regarding these paths?
>>
>> Mark P.
I’ve got some spare time (having caught up with the surveys from my last
holidays), so I can go through these and revert them. Any objections?
Mark P.
> On 9 Feb 2024, at 9:57 am, Andrew Harvey wrote:
>
> We do have permissions to use this data it's listed in
>
The weekly round-up of OSM news, issue # 707,
is now available online in English, giving as always a summary of a lot of
things happening in the openstreetmap world:
https://www.weeklyosm.eu/archives/17032
Enjoy!
Did you know that you can also submit messages for the weeklyOSM? Just log in
Bonjour,
Le résumé hebdomadaire n° 707 de l'actualité OpenStreetMap vient de paraître
*en français*. Un condensé à retrouver sur :
https://www.weeklyosm.eu/fr/archives/17032/
Bonne lecture !
Saviez-vous que vous pouvez vous aussi soumettre des messages pour la note
hebdomadaire sans être
Hi
Its OK by me. The park ranger who appears to be most connected to this
has been contacted and invited into our discussion. What more can we do?
Its unfortunatee that a slow motion edit war will be the likely outcome.
Tony
In that case, should I go ahead now with the revert?
Mark P.
No objections from me. They haven't responded yet, and from everything we
can tell they imported the data without any other cross checks and didn't
follow the import guidelines.
On Sun, 11 Feb 2024 at 22:00, Mark Pulley wrote:
> I’ve got some spare time (having caught up with the surveys from
7 matches
Mail list logo
