Re: [Tapestry-developer] custom RequestContext?

2002-11-24 Thread Joseph Panico
I think it would be a good idea to give users a hook to specify their own RequestContext implementation, regardless of the outcome of my Upload wants/needs. RequestContext plays a pretty central role and there is no way to anticipate all the odd things that developers might want tod do ;) One s

Re: [Tapestry-developer] problems with flash-integration

2002-11-24 Thread Malcolm Edgar
Hi Roberto, great to hear you got this working. Making a new sourceforge project sounds good for this, so you can continue working on it easily. There is a Tapestry Component Library project discussed on Wiki, this could be a good place for you work as well. Alternatively adding it to contrib

[Tapestry-developer] Re: suggestion

2002-11-24 Thread Howard M. Lewis Ship
I've given some thought to a declarative persistance model. Interestingly, I've also learned the bytecode tricks necessary to fill in abstract methods, much like a CMP Entity EJB. But this isn't even on the radar yet ... your IDE can create your getters and setters and you can fill in the extra (

Re: [Tapestry-developer] long running response component?

2002-11-24 Thread Howard M. Lewis Ship
There's some thoughts on the Wiki about implementing "insertials", where the user would see periodic updates in their browser. This involves sending a special multi-part MIME response. On my big, bad list! - Original Message - From: "Joseph Panico" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECT

[Tapestry-developer] New Tree Component

2002-11-24 Thread Misko Hevery
Hi Tsvetelin, Howard, and the community, I see that several people (including myself) are trying to develop a tree component for the tapestry. I think the tree component is very much needed in the tapestry package. The purpose of this email is to see if we can get all the people on the sam

[Tapestry-developer] [ tapestry-Feature Requests-643239 ] Add EmailValidator

2002-11-24 Thread noreply
Feature Requests item #643239, was opened at 2002-11-24 21:17 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=354754&aid=643239&group_id=4754 Category: framework Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Malcolm Edgar (malcolm_edgar) Assign

[Tapestry-developer] [ tapestry-Feature Requests-643239 ] Add EmailValidator

2002-11-24 Thread noreply
Feature Requests item #643239, was opened at 2002-11-24 21:17 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=354754&aid=643239&group_id=4754 Category: framework Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Malcolm Edgar (malcolm_edgar) Assign

[Tapestry-developer] [ tapestry-Feature Requests-622691 ] Full release

2002-11-24 Thread noreply
Feature Requests item #622691, was opened at 2002-10-13 19:07 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=354754&aid=622691&group_id=4754 Category: framework Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Richard Lewis-Shell (rlewisshell) As

Fw: [Tapestry-developer] ISO-8895-2 charset problem

2002-11-24 Thread detlef schulze
Uups. Sorry, my last post wasn't completely correct. Actually it is not the default constructor I modified, its just the constructor that is used by the class BasePage. I did the following (in HTMLWriter.java): public HTMLWriter(OutputStream outputStream) { this("text/html; charset

Re: [Tapestry-developer] ISO-8895-2 charset problem

2002-11-24 Thread detlef schulze
I had the same problem (in my case it was 8859-1), that made forms inputs with german special characters unusable. Since all browser I tried seem not to care about encoding metatags in the section and I did't want to use unicode I modified the default constructor of the class net.sf.tapestry.html

Re: [Tapestry-developer] Why not make listener events more generic

2002-11-24 Thread Drew Davidson
Geoff Longman wrote: Right now expressions that invoke listeners are like this: listeners.doSomething where doSomething is a method with the correct signature: public void doSomething(IRequestCycle cycle) throws RequestCycleException Why not extend this to make it possible to implement simple

Re: [Tapestry-developer] Vlib example

2002-11-24 Thread Howard M. Lewis Ship
Well, you can patch the code make MySQL happy, which is what you already have done. Praise open-source. You can go on the Wiki and create a page describing this so that others will be able to do the same. Please remember that the focus of the Vlib is to provide a shake-and-bake demo for Tapestry

Re: [Tapestry-developer] upload?

2002-11-24 Thread Howard M. Lewis Ship
I think the docs are wrong. I've been thinking about fixing that, but it will be runtime expensive (the Form will have to cache its contents and provide a mechanism for wrapped components to specify the enctype). - Original Message - From: "Joseph Panico" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL P

Re: [Tapestry-developer] custom RequestContext?

2002-11-24 Thread Howard M. Lewis Ship
Sorry, no, there isn't a convienient way. There should be, I guess. Could you expand on how RequestContext is failing you? - Original Message - From: "Joseph Panico" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, November 24, 2002 11:04 AM Subject: [Tapestry-developer] custom R

[Tapestry-developer] custom RequestContext?

2002-11-24 Thread Joseph Panico
Is there a way to tell Tapestry to use my custom subclass of RequestContext? The way Tapestry is handling file uploads is not quite suitable for my application. Joseph Panico [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Protect your PC - get McAfee.com V

[Tapestry-developer] I'm back ...

2002-11-24 Thread Howard M. Lewis Ship
I'm back from my vacation and business trip and busy catching up on mail ...   Howard Lewis Ship[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://tapestry.sf.net

[Tapestry-developer] Call for help!

2002-11-24 Thread Neil Clayton
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 This is a call for help with the Tutorial. I think most of the "hard" stuff has been done, including * build scripts * development environment * form handling * creating components * usage of some built in components I see two ways of proceeding with