Re: [Tapestry-developer] Tapestry and RSS

2002-12-13 Thread phraktle
hi, yes, i could have made it a service, but then i get to use the hellishly ugly tapestry urls :) btw, the urls are still my main concern with tapestry - i think it makes it a bad choice for a public site. let's say you have a store - ideally you want to have urls like http://foo.net/products/fo

Re: [Tapestry-developer] complex components

2002-12-13 Thread Christian Sell
thanks for the response. I think this will help me figure it out. AFAIK, Tiles does not have a true component model as Tapestry does. Doing the presentation is rather easy, but creating truly independent components (with behavior and resources) seems impossible. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Please

Re: [Tapestry-developer] complex components

2002-12-13 Thread hlship
Please check the documentation about "informal parameters". Basically, these are a back door that allow you, for most components, to specify additional HTML attributes as either static or dynamic properties. In your case, you can create a component that subclasses AbstractComponent and provide

[Tapestry-developer] complex components

2002-12-13 Thread Christian Sell
Hello, Being a newbie to Tapestry I chose to get my feet wet by implementing a little, however reasonably complex component - a calendar which should be fully localized and provide a way to move forward and backward monthwise, etc. I already have it implemented in struts/tiles, and wanted to s

Re: [Tapestry-developer] PDF or XLS generation

2002-12-13 Thread Juan Alvarez
I dont know what happen? my english isnt clear? =) Or maybe I one of the guys that dont read the documentation? Is tapestry only for hackers? or for users too? On Thu, Dec 12, 2002 at 05:05:19PM -0500, Juan Alvarez wrote: > I need, some of my users click on the submit on a form and then go to >

Re: [Tapestry-developer] FYI Star Trek Nemesis sucked

2002-12-13 Thread Joseph Panico
Nemesis almost put me to sleep. What a load of junk. File a bug report-- Howard will fix it ;) Joseph Panico [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: "Geoff Longman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: [Tapestry-developer] FYI Star Trek Nemesis sucked Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2002 13:25:28 -0500

Re: [Tapestry-developer] FYI Star Trek Nemesis sucked

2002-12-13 Thread Geoff Longman
> Now we know the *real* reason Spindle 1.1.3 is being delayed...it's all the > new movie releases! ;) Damn! I should kept my big mouth shut! Geoff --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: With Great Power, Comes Great Responsibility Learn t

Re: [Tapestry-developer] FYI Star Trek Nemesis sucked

2002-12-13 Thread John Rubier
Now we know the *real* reason Spindle 1.1.3 is being delayed...it's all the new movie releases! ;) On Fri, 13 Dec 2002 13:25:28 -0500 Geoff Longman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Off topic but I'll share anyways. > > I liked STNG, kinda liked Voyager, hate > Enterprise. > > Nemesis almost put me

[Tapestry-developer] FYI Star Trek Nemesis sucked

2002-12-13 Thread Geoff Longman
Off topic but I'll share anyways. I liked STNG, kinda liked Voyager, hate Enterprise. Nemesis almost put me to sleep. What a load of junk. I love working here! I also get to bail next week and go see the morning show of The Two Towers! Geoff Geoffrey Longman Intelligent Works Inc. ---

[Tapestry-developer] [ tapestry-Bugs-653358 ] IPage.getName() == qualified name

2002-12-13 Thread noreply
Bugs item #653358, was opened at 2002-12-13 17:36 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=104754&aid=653358&group_id=4754 Category: Tapestry Group: bug Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 9 Submitted By: Mind Bridge (mindbridge) Assigned to: Howard Lewis