Bugs item #655993, was opened at 2002-12-18 23:30
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=104754&aid=655993&group_id=4754
Category: Tapestry
Group: bug
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Michael Frericks (frericksm)
Assigned to: Howard L
Hi Thanks for your reply.
I had difficulties to "manual deploy" the tutorial.war in weblogic 6.1 SP4
(throught the weblogic console).
The "weblogic deployment process" will just corupt the file.
But I after I change the STARTMODE to false (auto deployment) everything
seems to be fine.
Only some w
ok, here goes again.
> As you can see, the difference between the above approaches is precisely 7
> lines in the locations that I have specified. I have put the '? lines'
I am not sure what locations you have specified. But assuming it is 7 lines
more to write for the "new component" approach, on
That's strange, you have:
On any forms or DirectLinks that occur while the
app is stateless (i.e., on the Home page)?
- Original Message -
From:
Brien
Voorhees
To: Tapestry Developers
Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 4:27
PM
Subject: [Tapestry-develop
Howard, I for one agree that WYSIWYG is more imprtant
than pretty URL's.
I also would resist solutions that are brittle. My
philosophy on design is similar to Paul Graham's... if
it isn't beautiful, there must be a better way. I
think that is what I hear you saying. So I will keep
thinking on
I've put up a new version of OGNL onto the http://www.ognl.org website.
I made the following changes:
1. Fixed performance bug related to adding private & protected access to JavaBeans-like accessors
Love,
Drew
--
+-+
< Drew Davidson | OGNL Technology >
+---
We just upgraded from Tapestry 2.2-rc1 to 2.3-beta1
and now any time a form is submitted or a link is clicked it results in a page
saying that the session is stale. Any clues as to why that might be?
To upgrade all I did was copied the following jars (basically the ones that
looked new):
mmh, after 13 years of OO, including 5 years Smalltalk, 6 years of Java and
2 years Apple WebObjects I would be *really* amazed if you could prove I
have a problem discerning objects from classes. I think, with MB we are
finally getting there. I'll be answering his mail in a few moments. This is
re
Hey, I'm chiming in late here, but this discussion seems like we're
smacking our heads against a brick wall a little bit. I think this
whole confusion is kind of related to the problem that lots of
developers have understanding the difference between "Class" and
"Instance". Christian wants
Just wanted to say that I really, really, really wanted Tapestry URLs to be
pretty, but it just doesn't work ... unless we through the WYSIWYG aspect out
the door!
Another option, which I'm a little loath to get into, is to identify relative
URLs in the HTML template and convert them to absolut
Don't confuse the silly little Border from the Tutorial with a for-real Border
component. Tutorial exist to demonstrate ideas.
Take a look at the Workbench's Border component for an example of something
more realistic.
It sets up stylesheets, draw the tabbed navigation view, includes the copyr
>Could you describe the application you're building, at what
about it makes it
>so that you require this complex configuration?
Thanks, I have already explained my scenario several times.
See more below.
>Where do its parameters come from? Do you mix and match
parameters specified in the
>
Hi Christian,
I think am clear as to what you suggest (see below for an example). Here is
an example of what I am talking about:
>>New Component (Tapestry 2.4):
>>-
>>1 x defining a new component
>> 5 lines + 'component configuration', 1 line template, 1 line alia
A few notes ...
Being able to specify the absolute path to a component was phased out in 2.2
because it makes it impossible to determine which namespace a particular
component should belong in. Further, in 2.4, component specifications can be
located on the classpath or within the context (tha
mb,
in continuation of the previous mail: Of yourse "new
component" is more "powerful", because you can override
everything that makes up a component, whereas reused
configurations can only override parameters. But I would
still question your arithmetics:
>New Component (Tapestry 2.4):
>-
>New Component (Tapestry pre 2.4):
>-
>1 x defining a new component
> 5 lines + 'component configuration', 1 line template,
1 line alias
>
>N x using the new component
> 1 line in page definition, 1 line in template
>
>New Component (Tapestry 2.4):
>
Encoding information in the path info was, in fact, the way Tapestry originally
operated.
It has a few defects.
As you wander the application, your base URL (used, by the client browser, to
calculate relative URLs) varies considerably ... this is especially bad in
Tapestry, because the number
>I think Mr. Sell is in a kind of "JMX" mindset, where there
is one
>configuration (possibly assembled from multiple places) that
is shared by
>everyting.
Howard,
I hope its ok if I address you that way. You may call me
Christian, too.
In fact "assembling" is not the right term. As I said
Hi Christian,
After checking my email I realize that I may be a bit late to the party, but
I had already written the text below, so I guess it would not hurt to send
it :)
> This is in contrast with other component systems I have used,
> among them tiles (BTW, if looked at solely from the
> stand
I'll keep the "nested component configuration namespaces"
item on the list of my personal favorites. Maybe, with
perseverance ... Also, I dont see this particular item as a
conceptual compromise.
regards,
Christian
Original message
>Datum: Thu, 19 Dec 2002 08:48:55 -0500
>Von: "Howar
It's wheels-within-wheels baby!
I think Mr. Sell is in a kind of "JMX" mindset, where there is one
configuration (possibly assembled from multiple places) that is shared by
everyting.
Tapestry has no special knowledge about its components. Whether create an
Insert or a contrib:Palette (pretty
Christian Sell wrote:
Hello,
I would like to bring up again the point about component
configurations. As far as I remember there was no final
answer.
In Tapestry component configurations have to be repeated for
every page and component which embeds the component.
Moreover, all components ha
> How Geoff is going to make Spindle support this is anyone's guess!
Yup.
---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by: Geek Gift Procrastinating?
Get the perfect geek gift now! Before the Holidays pass you by.
T H I N K G E E K . C O M http:/
I would suggest checking out the relevant portions on the Wiki.
Easing adoption of Tapestry is a big concern for us. Release 2.4 focuses on
this, making compromises that will ease adoption.
Basically, less is going into the specs and more into the HTML, but it's
still very much Tapestry. Most s
Hello,
I would like to bring up again the point about component
configurations. As far as I remember there was no final
answer.
In Tapestry component configurations have to be repeated for
every page and component which embeds the component.
Moreover, all components have to be assigned type a
There is an issue with WebLogic that it doesn't like a "." character in JARs
inside WEB-INF/lib. You should rename things to just "tapestry.jar". Not
sure when of if this is fixed.
- Original Message -
From: "Phil" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, December 19,
figured it out myself. I was using the expression for an
in/out binding (option/selected), and OGNL was refusing to
let the write go through (InappropriateExpressionException).
I wasnt expecting that the (boolean) "selected" parameter was
also written to.
thanks,
Christian
Original messa
Hi,
I'm starting a project soon and looking around to run Tapestry on weblogic
5.1 and above.
Does anyone knows its installation procedure ?
Hope to get some answer from this mailinglist.
thanks,
Phil
Service provided by MaGlobe Prepaid Worldwide Internet Access (visit www.MaGlobe.com)
---
28 matches
Mail list logo
