Re: [Taps] Socket Intents Draft ā€“ draft-tiesel-taps-socketintents-00

2017-06-17 Thread Philipp S. Tiesel
Hi Tommy, thanks for your appreciation and comments. > A few initial comments: > > - Iā€™d love to see the terminology be less sockets-specific, especially > considering the work for Post-Sockets APIs. A set of intents should be able > to be applied to individual messages being sent or on a

Re: [Taps] Socket Intents Draft ā€“ draft-tiesel-taps-socketintents-00

2017-06-17 Thread Michael Welzl
Hi, Thanks indeed for sharing this - I think this is very interesting input to the group. I agree with the things Tommy says below, but I have some additional thoughts that I wanted to share. Our charter is about existing protocols and what they can do. For TCP, MPTCP, UDP, UDP-Lite, SCTP and