Hi, Michael,
On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 12:45 PM, Michael Welzl wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Thanks a lot - I addressed them all. Details below, in line;
>
That all looks fine to me. I'll be putting this and the UDP draft out for
Last Call together, if that works for the chairs.
Spencer
> cheers,
> Michael
Hi, Michael,
On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 12:47 PM, Michael Welzl wrote:
>
> On Aug 24, 2017, at 10:24 PM, Spencer Dawkins at IETF <
> spencerdawkins.i...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Just to make these documents a bit more digestible by reviewers, ADs, and
> readers, who will almost certainly be reading th
> On Aug 24, 2017, at 10:24 PM, Spencer Dawkins at IETF
> wrote:
>
> Just to make these documents a bit more digestible by reviewers, ADs, and
> readers, who will almost certainly be reading them as a set ...
>
> I'm OK with the separation of the Pass 1 analysis of UDP(-lite) into a
> separa
Hi!
Thanks a lot - I addressed them all. Details below, in line;
cheers,
Michael
> On Aug 24, 2017, at 10:18 PM, Spencer Dawkins at IETF
> wrote:
>
> These are all editorial.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Spencer
>
> A nit - in this text,
>
>Transport Protocol: an implementation that provides one
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Transport Services WG of the IETF.
Title : On the Usage of Transport Features Provided by IETF
Transport Protocols
Authors : Michael Welzl