Robert-
Thanks for the (quick) clarification. I misunderstood the intent of
your note.
--aaron
On 6 Sep 2018, at 16:30, Robert Sparks wrote:
Aaron -
To be a bit more clear, my point is to twist the IESGs arm about
recent pushback on WGs publishing requirements documents...
RjS
On 9/6
Aaron -
To be a bit more clear, my point is to twist the IESGs arm about recent
pushback on WGs publishing requirements documents...
RjS
On 9/6/18 3:22 PM, Aaron Falk wrote:
On 6 Sep 2018, at 16:07, Robert Sparks wrote:
(Repeating one thing from my Last Call review for the benefit of
On 6 Sep 2018, at 16:07, Robert Sparks wrote:
(Repeating one thing from my Last Call review for the benefit of the
IESG):
This was a big effort, and it appears that it was helpful to the folks
working on the interface document, but it's not clear how it will be
useful to implementers. The IESG
Reviewer: Robert Sparks
Review result: Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your
document shepherd or AD before posting a new version
I would volunteer to bring this discussion on the floor in Bangkok, but will
only remotely participate in this meeting. Also, I have no experience with
setting up an IANA registry.
My anticipated strategy for the registry issue is the following:
- Use the planned restructuring of the Transport
