> On Sep 17, 2019, at 8:13 AM, Aaron Falk wrote:
>
> Michael-
>
> You make a good observation. It looks like activity has slowed on GitHub.
>
Indeed, it's been a bit slow. I intend to make PRs for a number of the issues I
have currently assigned; particularly, the goal is to do some more work
Michael-
You make a good observation. It looks like activity has slowed on
GitHub.
To all: Let’s have a discussion about agenda. If we find things we
should discuss, we can work on scheduling so the folks interested can
attend.
--aaron
On 17 Sep 2019, at 9:08, Michael Welzl wrote:
Seri
FWIW, I could still do the 23.
Later on doesn't work as well for me, as I'll be traveling a lot. In
October I probably won't be able to put in a lot of work, but I might
still be able to fit in an interim.
As there seems to be no simple way to make everyone happy, I'd say
another poll is the right
Seriously, do we all think we need this interim (or, that we all need it
already in September, and not maybe e.g. a month from now)?
I haven't seen a lot of activity post-IETF in the repository. Speaking for
myself, I don't have time available for TAPS drafts within the next week, but I
did ha
I've scheduled over that :(. can possibly reschedule now but would prefer
running another poll.
Cheers,
Brian
> On 17 Sep 2019, at 14:46, Aaron Falk wrote:
>
> Ugh, well it turns out that I’m moving on 9/27 and Zahed has a conflict. The
> doodle poll looked pretty good for Monday, 9/23. I kn
Ugh, well it turns out that I’m moving on 9/27 and Zahed has a
conflict. The doodle poll looked pretty good for Monday, 9/23. I know
it’s short notice but are folks still available? If not, we’ll run
another poll for a couple weeks later. Unless someone wants to chair
the interim in our abs
