Re: [Taps] TAPS Sept 2019 Interim Scheduling

2019-09-19 Thread Aaron Falk
I’m not hearing a critical mass of active wg folks wanting an interim. Seems like we should cancel. Anyone want to argue otherwise? --aaron On 18 Sep 2019, at 8:33, Colin Perkins wrote: Likewise. And I’m also not convinced we’d make good use of an interim just now. Colin On 17 Sep 2019

Re: [Taps] TAPS Sept 2019 Interim Scheduling

2019-09-19 Thread Brian Trammell (IETF)
I've found the interims useful as a forcing/clocking function to actually get work to happen. Alas, it has not had that effect (at least on me), so I'm not going to argue not to cancel. Cheers, Brian > On 19 Sep 2019, at 16:01, Aaron Falk wrote: > > I’m not hearing a critical mass of active