Re: [Taps] Conflict with next meeting - Jan 26

2022-01-16 Thread Anna Brunström
I plan to attend, but moving the meeting to Feb 2 would be better also for me. Anna From: Taps On Behalf Of Aaron Falk Sent: den 15 januari 2022 22:26 To: Mirja Kuehlewind Cc: taps@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Taps] Conflict with next meeting - Jan 26 Can folks who are planning to attend the TAPS in

Re: [Taps] Conflict with next meeting - Jan 26

2022-01-16 Thread Colin Perkins
I’ll definitely miss the first hour; unclear about the second. Colin > On 15 Jan 2022, at 21:26, Aaron Falk wrote: > > Can folks who are planning to attend the TAPS interim on Jan 26 at 11am EST > reply to this message? Let’s see if we still have a critical mass. > > —aaron > > On Fri, Jan

Re: [Taps] Conflict with next meeting - Jan 26

2022-01-16 Thread Brian Trammell (IETF)
I’m planning on being there. If we reschedule, pushing to 2 Feb will work for me, but after that my next available Wednesday at the normal slot is 2 Mar. Cheers, Brian > On 15 Jan 2022, at 22:26, Aaron Falk wrote: > > Can folks who are planning to attend the TAPS interim on Jan 26 at 11am EST

[Taps] Weekly github digest (TAPS Activity Summary)

2022-01-16 Thread Repository Activity Summary Bot
Issues -- * ietf-tapswg/api-drafts (+0/-3/💬4) 2 issues received 4 new comments: - #1001 Interface: Questions about property inheritance of the MessageContext object (3 by benthor, mwelzl) https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/1001 [API] - #993 secdir: s9.1.3.2: Priority d