Re: [Taps] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8095 (5285)

2018-03-12 Thread Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF)
Ups… I’ll go ahead and verify this one! > Am 12.03.2018 um 09:04 schrieb Gorry Fairhurst : > > This Errata seems valid. Sorry that was not spotted. > > Gorry > > On 12/03/2018, 03:54, RFC Errata System wrote: >> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8095, >> "Services Provided

Re: [Taps] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-taps-transports-usage-08: (with COMMENT)

2017-09-12 Thread Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF)
Hi Gorry, see below. > Am 12.09.2017 um 18:32 schrieb Gorry Fairhurst : > > On 11/09/2017, 16:48, Mirja Kühlewind wrote: >> Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for >> draft-ietf-taps-transports-usage-08: No Objection >> >> >> >> >> -

Re: [Taps] Eric Rescorla's No Record on draft-ietf-taps-transports-usage-08: (with COMMENT)

2017-09-11 Thread Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF)
Hi Micheal, I also just caught that, assuming is was an copy-and-past left over; I think the best options are either: *** [RFC7413] states that TCP implementations "MUST NOT use TFO by default, but only use TFO if requested explicitly by the application on a per-service-port basis" [RFC7413].