Craig Hartnett wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> So if I delete my initial archive today, Tarsnap will realise that it
> has to upload pretty much everything -- not everything, but almost
> everything -- again, right?
>
> And what if I delete a file -- any file -- on my hard drive that has
> been backed up
Craig Hartnett wrote:
> Yet in both cases, the command does not exit for about 16-21 minutes,
> which is what was going to lead me to complain. However, the actual
> restore was done about as quickly as one would expect.
Hi. tarsnap follows the "tar" standard. In fact, it actually uses the
bsd
Colin Percival <cperc...@tarsnap.com> wrote:
> On 07/16/17 04:37, Jamie Landeg-Jones wrote:
> > (I sent this a week or so ago, but the message never appeared)
>
> Were you subscribed to the list? Messages from addresses not subscribed get
> filtered into a moder
> I just started using tarsnap, and I was wondering if there exists an
> option (or the potential interest in developing an option) to put a cap
> on an archive size.
[ ... ]
> The closest thing I could find is the --maxbw option; is there a
> corresponding option for archive size that I'm not
Actually, re-reading your message, I now think I misunderstood, and you want to
limit the size of the individual virtual archive, rather than the literal size
of
data-transfered?
J.
Colin Percival wrote:
> Maybe we should add a --passphrase-force option which overrides tarsnap's
> attempt to autodetect whether there's enough memory. (Does anyone have a
> preference for what the option is named?)
After lately spending some time on Unix portability
This isn't really necessary for the case of copy files to a different
device -- it's specific to the case of filesystem snapshots (as in UFS
and ZFS) because those will keep the timestamps from the underlying file
system.
Oh I see. Thanks.
Also, I realise I misread the original question - I
*** Can config files include other files?
I don't know off hand, but if I wanted to know, I'd try it :-)
Don't forget the '--dry-run' option to tarsnap, coupled with '--verbose'
lets you test out all your changes/excludes/includes/nodumps etc.
without actually spending time/money/screwup-risk
Bob Williams li...@barrowhillfarm.org.uk wrote:
If I remove all those include directives, then it runs as I expect,
lots of lines beginning with 'a', and apparently backing up all the
non-excluded stuff in /home/bob (which is what I want) and the whole
of /etc (which I don't want). I could
N!
If you remove the leading '/' off your exclude pattern, it will exclude
any match of that directory in the tree. Even excludes of 2 or more
directory levels, e.g. --exclude usr/src would match usr/users/jamie/usr/src
To exclude reliably, you have to 'anchor' the path to root by
Bob Williams li...@barrowhillfarm.org.uk wrote:
Jamie,
Many thanks for your timely intervention and very clear explanation.
Perhaps the manpage could include some examples?
No problem! Applogies if it came across a bit ranty, I hadn't slept for
2 days, and my OCD was running high. I'm calm
11 matches
Mail list logo