Re[2]: SOT: W2000 Pro

2000-02-16 Thread phil
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 DH> So why forced to 192.168.0.1? It's one of the 63,000 bugs--I mean *features* in w2k. microsoft wants you to be a class C network ;o) DH> Running TheBat! 1.41 Beta/3 [2E7F60DA] on DH> Windows NT v4 Build 1381 Service Pack 6 Why not migrate back t

Re: SOT: W2000 Pro

2000-02-16 Thread Steve Lamb
Wednesday, February 16, 2000, 3:41:24 PM, Sashka wrote: > it. I could use ANY IP. but there was a lot of problems. so they > "fixed" this problem another way... :-) Besides, I would not use Windows for such a task anyway. It is a game OS and, partially, a workstation os, not a server/servi

Re[2]: SOT: W2000 Pro

2000-02-16 Thread Sashka
Hello Dieter, DH> So why forced to 192.168.0.1? why? because it is microsoft! ;-) when it has different IP it doesn't work! I remember this feature in betas of win98se, when MS just included it. I could use ANY IP. but there was a lot of problems. so they "fixed" this problem another way...

No Subject

2000-02-16 Thread Alexander V. Kiselev
NOMAIL [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- -- View the TBBETA archive at http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com To send a message to the list moderation team double-click HERE: To Unsubscribe from TBBETA, doub

Re: SOT: W2000 Pro

2000-02-16 Thread Steve Lamb
Wednesday, February 16, 2000, 3:24:57 PM, Dieter wrote: > So why forced to 192.168.0.1? It is a Microsoft product and you need to ask this? -- Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your ICQ: 5107343 | main connection to the switchboard of s

Re: SOT: W2000 Pro

2000-02-16 Thread Dieter Hummel
Hello List Members, on 16.02.2000 at 23:57, Steve Lamb wrote: > 192.168.x.x is the a private network and the "normal" network for > those behind NAT. I know that, Steve - alas why don't they offer the freedom of chosing an address range of my favour. I would have to change my address

Re: SOT: W2000 Pro

2000-02-16 Thread Steve Lamb
Wednesday, February 16, 2000, 2:48:29 PM, Dieter wrote: > Sorry, it defaults to 192.168.0.1 . 192.168.x.x is the a private network and the "normal" network for those behind NAT. -- Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your ICQ: 5107343

Re: SOT: W2000 Pro

2000-02-16 Thread Dieter Hummel
Hello List Members, on 16.02.2000 at 19:28, Dieter Hummel wrote: > I find it pretty annoying that the system defaults to IP 168.0.0.1 - Sorry, it defaults to 192.168.0.1 . Regards Dieter Hummel Running TheBat! 1.41 Beta/3 [2E7F60DA] on Windows NT v4 Build 1381 Service Pack 6 Register

SOT: W2000 Pro

2000-02-16 Thread Dieter Hummel
Hello Listmembers, I recently got my license W2000 Pro and installed it on one of my local workstations. Is there anybody who uses the router functionality of W2000 - eliminating the need for WinGate or Winroute or similar add ons? I find it pretty annoying that the system defaults to I

Test

2000-02-16 Thread Syafril Hermansyah
Hello [EMAIL PROTECTED], Testing. -- Best regards, - Syafril - Name: Syafril Hermansyah | Company : Duta Integrasi Pratama Mailto : [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Voice : (62) (21) 385-1600 URL : www.dutai

Re: cookies ?!?!

2000-02-16 Thread Allie Martin
On Wed, 16 Feb 2000 14:43:18 +0700, Wie wrote: > Can I setting TB! so when composing new mail,... TB! took 2 > line cookies. ?? [enter/space separate] > So at my new editing mail,.. there are word: Your cookie line in the cookie file should look like this: If I make a tea \n then you drink a

Hugely long URLS

2000-02-16 Thread Graham Foster
Hello TBBETA, If any of you have ever used Domino (Lotus Notes on the web) you will be familiar with the HUGE URL's it generates (like 130+ characters!) Any chance that TB! 2 will not word wrap a URL please, and that it will also understand (i.e. still hyperlink to) a quoted URL regar