(No Subject)

2000-03-18 Thread Chuck Mattsen
Sorry, that last one was meant to go privately :*) I'm usually pretty good about that. Mea maxima culpa. Chuck -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Chuck Mattsen[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.users.uswest.net/~mattsen =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Random Thought/Quote for

Re[3]: bug: blank top line

2000-03-18 Thread Chuck Mattsen
On Saturday, March 18, 2000 at 6:44 PM or thereabouts, tracer wrote the following about bug: blank top line: Roel>>> i just noticed: everyone who's been using 142/x has a blank Roel>>> line on the top... since *everybody got it, i think it's a Roel>>> bug... >> Oh, thank god ... I thought it w

Re[2]: bug: blank top line

2000-03-18 Thread tracer
Hello Chuck Mattsen, On Sat, 18 Mar 2000 18:03:24 -0600 GMT your local time, which was Sunday, March 19, 2000, 7:03:24 AM (GMT+0700) my local time, Chuck Mattsen wrote: > On Saturday, March 18, 2000 at 5:54 PM or thereabouts, Roel wrote the > following about bug: blank top line: Roel>> i just

Re: bug: blank top line

2000-03-18 Thread Chuck Mattsen
On Saturday, March 18, 2000 at 5:54 PM or thereabouts, Roel wrote the following about bug: blank top line: Roel> i just noticed: everyone who's been using 142/x has a blank line Roel> on the top... since *everybody got it, i think it's a bug... Oh, thank god ... I thought it was just me.A m

bug: blank top line

2000-03-18 Thread Roel
Hello Everybody, i just noticed: everyone who's been using 142/x has a blank line on the top... since *everybody got it, i think it's a bug... -- Der Immer Jodelende Schweizer In Lederhosen Roel [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Speelplein Aboe http://www.aboe.zzn.com * SCUD

bug report: compressing folders doesn't work at all

2000-03-18 Thread Roel
Hello Everybody, I just found out that the 'compress folder' doesn't work at all: when you open up the message-base in an editor, you'll still see all the old messages inside... This is the case with 1.42 beta 3... so, my 'cosmetic bug' seems to be a real one instead :-) can anyone

Re: Large message arrived to your address

2000-03-18 Thread Allie Martin
On Sat, 18 Mar 2000 18:34:50 +0100, MaXxX wrote: > It's not really that bad. > The message is MOST probably still on the server - just press > Shift+Ctrl+F2 and Bat will give you a list of all mail on the server, > with an option to download or delete specific messages. No it didn't. T

Re: Drag and Drop folders don't drop

2000-03-18 Thread Allie Martin
On Sat, 18 Mar 2000 12:40:47 +, Simon wrote: S>> TB! 1.42 Beta/3 suffers from dodgy folder syndrome also. DON'T S>> try and drag folders into other folders whilst holding down the S>> ALT key else your message base gets cocked up. Produces a 'could S>> not create a new index of messa

Re[2]: Large message arrived to your address

2000-03-18 Thread tracer
Hello Christopher J. Trybowski, On Sat, 18 Mar 2000 10:24:40 +0100 GMT your local time, which was Saturday, March 18, 2000, 4:24:40 PM (GMT+0700) my local time, Christopher J. Trybowski wrote: > Hello Thomas, > On Friday, March 17, 2000 you wrote: >> Do you know how Eudora handles this?: Ther

Re[2]: Large message arrived to your address

2000-03-18 Thread MaXxX
>> This is the first that I've received a message like this, but >> I had set TB! to simply download the headers for messages greater than >> 1MB, NOT to delete it from the server. This was a copy of netcaptor >> pro beta sent by Netcaptor support. I wonder why they did this instead >> of

Why I Can't delete attachment file ?!

2000-03-18 Thread Wie
@HOME Hi There!, just want to know,.. why i can't delete attachment file right now [manually] at preview pane ?!? Usually at that file i right click my mouse and choose 'delete' and the attachment will be deleted,... but now it can't ? If this is a new feature at TB! [attachment

Re: The Bat! - bug report

2000-03-18 Thread Dieter Hummel
Hello List Members, on 18.03.2000 at 10:24, Christopher J. Trybowski wrote: > TB doesn't seem to obey the view/encoding/set as default setting > Steps to reproduce the bug: > I have a message written in ISO-8859-2, but without proper charset. I > think I have set TB up so that this enco

Re: Drag and Drop folders don't drop

2000-03-18 Thread Simon
Existing, Listers, dia duit! Oh, I am sorry. It was a bit forward of me wasn't it - posting without being formerly introduced that is. ;) I suppose being 'till now only a lowly TBUDL member, I should really of highlighted my newness to the List first. As a simple matter of courtesy you understa

Re: Wait for next beta !

2000-03-18 Thread Marvin Green
Hi Wie [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > X-Mailer: TB! v1.41 (wait for register,...) Thanks for TB! Team for your Good >Proggie. Is this the Mailerinfo, when you havn't yet registert ? What Topleveldomain is .AM ? -- Jan -- -- View the TBBETA

Re[2]: 1.42 Beta/3 is available

2000-03-18 Thread Stefan Tanurkov
Hello Mark, MA> Contrary to my earlier mail, TB! will still only FETCH/SEND once in Win2k MA> unless you restart the Bat. We'll check it soon... -- Regards, Stefanmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ..."What counts is not necessarily the size of the dog in the fight; it

Re[2]: 1.42 Beta/3 is available

2000-03-18 Thread Stefan Tanurkov
Good [morning|afternoon|day|evening|night] Peter, PG> 1. Messages with multipart/mixed were not converted properly: the PG> attachment is shown in the text now. Please send the MSB file to me. PG> 2. Received date for some very old messages is not correct and they PG> are shown as today's me