Re[2]: "browse deleted messages" option on INBOX

2000-04-01 Thread Marek Mikus
Hello, Sunday, April 02, 2000, Stefan wrote: > Hello Marek, MM>> In new beta versions is a option "browse deleted messages". It is MM>> good, when I delete message and after exit program, TB delete trash. MM>> OK, but Why don't TB delete messages from INBOX msgbase, when he MM>> filters

Re[3]: Getting some bad attachments sent

2000-04-01 Thread tracer
Hello Gary, On Sat, 1 Apr 2000 16:46:44 -0600 GMT your local time, which was Sunday, April 02, 2000, 5:46:44 AM (GMT+0700) my local time, Gary wrote: > Custom Today's thought for Alex: > As easy as 3.1415926535897932384626433832795028841. Dangerous thing to use, he may TRY giving you the othe

Re[2]: Getting some bad attachments sent

2000-04-01 Thread Gary
Hi Alex, On Saturday, April 01, 2000, 5:44:20 PM, you wrote in part about "Getting some bad attachments sent": A> Should be of no difference. Default encoding modifies the A> subheaders of the first (textual) part of MIME multipart message, A> whereas the information necessary for correct deco

Re: Getting some bad attachments sent

2000-04-01 Thread Alexander V. Kiselev
Hi there! On 1 Apr 00, at 16:46, Gary wrote about "Re[2]: Getting some bad attachments sent": > A> The information you supplied below isn't enough to judge, what was > A> the real case of decoding failure. Please ask your recipient to > A> supply the _whole_ message he received in the MSG fo

Re[2]: Getting some bad attachments sent

2000-04-01 Thread Gary
Hi Alexander, On Saturday, April 01, 2000, 4:32:52 PM, you wrote in part about "Getting some bad attachments sent": >> I have on several occasions sent some attachments (MIME coded - Alt >> - page up, or just dragging them in the editor), and the recipients >> have not been getting them. This

Re: Getting some bad attachments sent

2000-04-01 Thread Alexander V. Kiselev
Hi there! On 1 Apr 00, at 15:14, Gary wrote about "Getting some bad attachments sent": > I have on several occasions sent some attachments (MIME coded - Alt - > page up, or just dragging them in the editor), and the recipients have > not been getting them. This is a sample of what they hav

Re: View Folder Title Bar Does Not Change (Cosmetic)

2000-04-01 Thread Paul
Hello Simon, Confirmed all. Win98SE - AMD - 48MB Saturday, April 01, 2000, 2:04:23 PM, you wrote: S> A Chairde, S> Bug Subject: View Folder Title Bar (Cosmetic, but misleading) S> Bug Description: When using the *new* Shift+Ctrl+G navigation feature, the S> Viewer Title bar is not updated to

Getting some bad attachments sent

2000-04-01 Thread Gary
Hi TBBETA, I have on several occasions sent some attachments (MIME coded - Alt - page up, or just dragging them in the editor), and the recipients have not been getting them. This is a sample of what they have received, in part. In this case, the mailer on recipient's end was Microsoft Outloo