Hello ron,
On Wednesday, April 12, 2000 you wrote:
>> And what happens? I don't see any difference...
> It didn't help me either.
Yes, we are talking about the same thing. And this helped here -- the
attachment icons are all the time on screen, while I used to notice
the same behavior as you
Hello Nick,
On Wednesday, April 12, 2000 you wrote:
> Thomas, where can you find this glyphs.bmp file? It doesn't exist on my
> Hard Drive, and I see no mention of it on RITLabs FTP Site.
It is on my Polish Unofficial The Bat! Page which is unfortunately
unusable for majority of you ;) :
htt
Hello Marck,
Tuesday, April 11, 2000, 5:36:54 AM, you wrote:
> When we originally talked about the lack of flagging facilities in TB
> one of the suggestions made was to open up Priority for modification.
> Steve Lamb gave a very good set of reasons not to allow priority of
> received mess
On Tuesday, April 11, 2000, 11:01:48 AM, Christopher J. Trybowski wrote:
> compress your folders, then delete all *.tbi files from your message
> base.
Christopher, is that a recognised fix for the problem of TB! not showing
the attachment icon with HTML messages? Is there some documentation w
Hello Stefan,
Tuesday, April 11, 2000, 3:41:11 AM, you wrote:
JA>> In the features list of Beta 10, Stefan had mentioned,
JA>> [*] Broken message threads can be repaired by using the References
JA>> field
JA>> Does anyone know how to do this?
> Well, this actually means that when some
Hello List Members,
on 11.04.2000 at 19:46, Nick Andriash wrote:
> Yes, I hear what you are saying Thomas... but the ability to flag
> messages with different colour flags is important, and not a frivolous
> request, even though you can't see that importance at present. :o)
> Flagging/Labelling.
Hello List Members,
on 11.04.2000 at 18:13, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
> "Pending" messages are those that still need replying and will
> henceforth be marked with the "flag" flag. A message is not an open
> case-file that remains pending for some time. It is one momentary shot
> of a situation. Ev
On Tue, 11 Apr 2000 19:55:31 +0200, Christopher J. Trybowski wrote:
> I have some other proposals. First of all I'd like to be able
> to globally turn the flag column on, which actually means that I'd
> like the ability to globally edit folder properties. So I don't
> expect it too soon
Hello Alexander,
On Tuesday, April 11, 2000 you wrote:
> Hi there!
> On 11 Apr 00, at 9:27, Nick Andriash wrote
> about "Re: Flags":
>> Now that we have that capability, I would like to see more colours
>> introduced, with user-definable headings. Red could be for "Important";
>> Yellow for
On Tue, 11 Apr 2000 11:05:32 -0700, Nick Andriash wrote:
> Well, I should have been more specific in my criticism, and then you
> wouldn't have had to grumble. ;o)
Did I sound that bad?
--
© Allie
» Using TB! v1.42 Beta/16 »» Win2k Pro
---
** You want computer jokes? Ok: IBM, NEC,
Hello Andreas,
On Monday, April 10, 2000 you wrote:
> Hi The Bat! users,
> in Beta/16 still no display for HTML attachments... :-(
compress your folders, then delete all *.tbi files from your message
base.
--
Christopher J. Trybowski
Hello Jerry,
On Monday, April 10, 2000 you wrote:
> One little extra which (IMHO) would improve things even more:
> It would help me immensely if there were some means of
> indicating which folders contain flagged messages (maybe by
> colour, or superimposing a flag on the folder icon
Hello The Bat! developers,
I'm using The Bat! Version 1.42 Beta/16
Serial Number 4FF098A9
under Windows 98 4.10 Build 1998
and would like to report a bug
The bug description:
When a filter action is executed, only the plain-text part of mail
is checked upon the appearance o
Hello Nick,
On Tuesday, April 11, 2000 you wrote:
> Now that we have that capability, I would like to see more colours
> introduced, with user-definable headings. Red could be for "Important";
> Yellow for "Pending"; Blue for... well, you get the idea. About six
> colours in all would suffice...
On Tuesday, April 11, 2000, 10:46:28 AM, Allie Martin wrote:
> Well, I don't see anything wrong with sending a
> nice Christmas card or so now and then. Unfortunately society seems to
> work better with black and white implementations because of those who
> choose to abuse a feature.
Well, I s
On Tue, 11 Apr 2000 23:19:25 +0700, tracer wrote:
> But it only works for the BOX selected. PLEASE, If I want it I want
> it on ALL boxes. It should be specified per account at least and
> even that doesnt work
There's a method provided Tracer and that's via the "Use
default column setti
Hello,
When I click to folder "Outbox", I have no option "Flags" in menu
"Message".
Why?
--
Thanks and Bye,
Marek Mikus
Using the best The Bat! 1.42 Beta/16
under the worst Windows 95 4.0 Build B
Intel Celeron 266 MHz, 32 MB
--
--
On Wed, 12 Apr 2000 00:13:50 +0800, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
DH>> To integrate flagging in sorting-office is a step in the right
DH>> direction...
> I don't see the point. If necesasary, I can sort messages into special
> folders instead of using a wide variety of flags. It makes it easier
> to k
On Tuesday, April 11, 2000, 9:46:03 AM, Marck D. Pearlstone wrote:
> This bug was already reported (Graham Foster on Apr 6th) and confirmed
> but only applies to using the key manager window in the internal
> version of PGP.
Ah, well that will explain why it doesn't affect my install... I
Bialystok/PL, 2000-04-11
Hello Michal,
ST>> [-] Some minor cosmetic fixes
MK> Is it possible to include to "Some minor cosmetic fixes" in next beta
MK> versions not to check by default position nam
Bialystok/PL, 2000-04-11
Hello Stefan,
ST> [-] Some minor cosmetic fixes
Is it possible to include to "Some minor cosmetic fixes" in next beta
versions not to check by default position named "Autom
Hello Marck D. Pearlstone,
Responding to your article on Tuesday, April 11, 2000 at 09:49:59 GMT
+0100 (which was 11/04/2000 15:49 GMT +0700 my Local Time) :
>> Are you running any proxy ? If yes, try again with the proxy service
>> disable.
MDP> I am ... and I have previously. No change
On Tue, 11 Apr 2000 13:48:37 +0200, Marek Mikus wrote:
> I have problem with automatic filtering in Beta/16:
> When I create new filtr (for example "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"), which
> is processed by "subject" with string "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" and I create
> new folder with name "CanisOnelist",
Hello,
I have problem with automatic filtering in Beta/16:
When I create new filtr (for example "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"), which
is processed by "subject" with string "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" and I create
new folder with name "CanisOnelist", TB receive mail and it is stored
in INBOX and not move
Hi tracer,
On 10 April 2000 at 00:05:00 GMT +0700 (which was about 18:05 where I
live) tracer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote about "(No Subject)" and made
these points:
t> Why does it want to stick the mailbox on my windows desktop???
t> I havent any other clean system to see if its normal and this
t
Hello Januk,
>> I remember Stefan had added the ability to fix broken threads, but I
>> can't seem to figure out how. Could someone please enlighten this
>> heathen? Thanks.
JA> In the features list of Beta 10, Stefan had mentioned,
JA> [*] Broken message threads can be repaired by us
Hello tracer,
t> Question: during an experiment I installed a version of the Bat clean,
t> something I havent done in a LONG time.
t> Why does it want to stick the mailbox on my windows desktop???
I am not sure. Probably, because a wrong mail directory path...
--
All the Best!
Stefan
Hello Allie,
On Tue, 11 Apr 2000 04:58:12 -0500GMT (11/04/2000, 17:58 +0800GMT),
Allie Martin wrote:
>> I must admit: I don't know, what those flags can be used for...?!
AM> The red flag provides a way of marking special messages
AM> without having to park them. That's really all there
On Tue, 11 Apr 2000 00:22:47 +0200, Marek Mikus wrote:
>> in Beta/16 still no display for HTML attachments... :-(
> when I click on message, attachment icon appears, When I hit Esc, icon
> disappears. :-(
The bizarre thing is that it doesn't happen with all HTML
messages and in all fold
On Tue, 11 Apr 2000 11:33:21 +0200, Andreas Rumpenhorst wrote:
> I must admit: I don't know, what those flags can be used for...?!
The red flag provides a way of marking special messages
without having to park them. That's really all there is to it.
> In a message I cannot flag anything
Hi The Bat! users,
I must admit: I don't know, what those flags can be used for...?!
In a message I cannot flag anything except the priority, right?
Please enlighten me!
Best regards,
Andreas mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm using The Bat! 1.42 Beta/16 under Windows 98 2
Hello Marek, Hamburg/GER, Tuesday, April 11, 2000
in your mail dated Tuesday, April 11, 2000, 00:22,
you whispered something about "No Attachments":
>> in Beta/16 still no display for HTML attachments... :-(
MM> when I click on message, attachment icon appears, When I hit Es
This message: 11/04/2000 07:47 GMT.
Monday, April 10, 2000, 9:25:37 PM, Simon wrote:
S> A Chairde,
S> Bug Subject:
S> Anyone else finding that the Display/Only blah blah is very quirky?
S> If you select Display/Only UnFlagged, /Only Unread, /Only Unparked you'll
S> see what I mean S
Hi Graham,
On 11 April 2000 at 09:45:43 GMT +0100 (which was 09:45 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points on the subject
of "Forwarded messages":
> Why aren't forwarded messages grouped under the same thread when
> sorted by subject (or thread ref)?
Well, a Fwd: mod
Hi tracer,
On 11 April 2000 at 09:51:43 GMT +0700 (which was 03:51 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points on the subject
of "The Bat! - bug report":
>> Send a mail to a locally installed MDaemon server using TCP/IP and
>> SMTP on an NT domain DHCP-centric LAN with
Hi Syafril,
On 11 April 2000 at 09:34:17 GMT +0700 (which was 03:34 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points on the subject
of "The Bat! - bug report":
MDP>> Observe the behaviour of the Transmission progress dialog
MDP>> and the cancel button.
> I curios this i
Hello All,
Why aren't forwarded messages grouped under the same thread when
sorted by subject (or thread ref)?
regards,
Graham
Using The Bat! 1.42 Beta/16
under Windows NT 4.0
(Build 1381, Service Pack 5)
--
--
37 matches
Mail list logo
