Re[2]: Empty Subject Reminder

Hi, Every time the bat! add new functionality (empty subject, virus warning, ...) the registry is used. This is okey, but the way I use the bat on my local machine (NT with different accounts for personal and job-related issues) I think TB! should update the registry for all accounts that use TB!

Re: 1.45 Beta/1

On Mon, 19 Jun 2000 13:53:54 +0200, Jast wrote: >> [+] Shift/Ctrl/Alt keys pressed make Reply button to work different J> Alt+Reply obviously replies to sender. But what do the others do? Shift+Reply will generate a reply quoting only selected text. Ctrl+Reply will generate a

Re: Single Inbox for Multiple Accounts

On Mon, 19 Jun 2000 11:20:10 -0700, EarthLink wrote: E> I was wondering if there will ever be an option allowing all of your E> mail to be retrieved in one in box instead of multiple in boxes. I E> have about 5 accounts and having all of those accounts in the E> account tree gets kind of

Re[2]: 1.45 Beta/1

Hello Christopher, CJT> Encoding? Does this mean that we can write in Unicode? No, but if you send LDAP enquires in 8-bit encoding, it also needs to be UTF-encoded... -- Sincerely, Stefanmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ...Evoluiton is God's way of issuing upgrades --

Re: 1.45 Beta/1

Hello Stefan, On Monday, June 19, 2000 you wrote: ST> [*] System-independent UTF encoding/decoding Encoding? Does this mean that we can write in Unicode? -- Christopher J. Trybowski === -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- [EMAIL

Re[2]: Single Inbox for Multiple Accounts

Hello Jast, In your mail dated Monday, June 19, 2000 you wrote > If you filter them to one account anyway you *can* close them, so > they take only one line. Is that so consumpteous of space? I have thought of doing this many times in the past, the only problem doing things this way is mail ma

Re: Single Inbox for Multiple Accounts

In Reference to "Single Inbox for Multiple Accounts" From Roel: R> Hi Jast R> On Mon, 19 Jun 2000 17:47:53 +0200GMT R>(which was 19/06/00, 17:47 +0100GMT for me), R> you wrote: J>> If you filter them to one account anyway you *can* close them, so J>> they take only one line. Is that s

Re: Single Inbox for Multiple Accounts

Hi Jast On Mon, 19 Jun 2000 17:47:53 +0200GMT (which was 19/06/00, 17:47 +0100GMT for me), you wrote: J> If you filter them to one account anyway you *can* close them, so J> they take only one line. Is that so consumpteous of space? it depends: i've got about 15 accounts right now... so t

Re: Single Inbox for Multiple Accounts

Morning EarthLink, > I was wondering if there will ever be an option allowing all of your > mail to be retrieved in one in box instead of multiple in boxes. AFAIK, this is planned for v2, as many other things are. > I have about 5 accounts and having all of those accounts in the > account

missing scroll bar

Hello TBBETA, the scroll bar on the right-hand side is still missing sometimes. I still haven't found a pattern. -- Best regards, Thomas mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Generated with The Bat! 1.45 Beta/1 S/N 49B7D17A under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build 1998 using a Celero

Single Inbox for Multiple Accounts

Hello Stefan, I was wondering if there will ever be an option allowing all of your mail to be retrieved in one in box instead of multiple in boxes. I have about 5 accounts and having all of those accounts in the account tree gets kind of overwhelming. I realize that I can filter the oth

Re[2]: Reading confirmation

Hello Stefan Tanurkov > Hello Graham, GF>> TB! never has acknowledged MS-Exchange generated read-receipt GF>> notification. This beta also ignores the read receipt stuff. Is this GF>> a MS-ignoring-the-standards issue? GF>> Example header info included > I am afraid, I don't quite

Re[2]: Empty Subject Reminder

Hello Stefan Tanurkov, On Mon, 19 Jun 2000 15:37:13 +0300 GMT your local time, which was Monday, June 19, 2000, 7:37:13 PM (GMT+0700) my local time, Stefan Tanurkov wrote: > Hello Thomas, TF>> Nice. Question: I can uncheck "always show this warning". If I uncheck TF>> it and later I change my m

Re[2]: Alive?

Hello Syafril Hermansyah, On Mon, 19 Jun 2000 11:20:18 +0700 GMT your local time, which was Monday, June 19, 2000, 11:20:18 AM (GMT+0700) my local time, Syafril Hermansyah wrote: > Hello tracer, t>> On the other hand hitting the bystanders using often misused / abused t>> servers is a fairly

Re: 1.45 Beta/1

Hello Stefan, on Mon, 19 Jun 2000 13:36:45 +0300 GMT your local time you wrote: ST> [+] Empty subject reminder great! A cosmentical one: The message box says "Though it field can be left empty", I guess it must read "Though this field can be left empty". -- Regards, Peter Using The Bat!

Re: Empty Subject Reminder

Hi Stefan On Mon, 19 Jun 2000 15:37:13 +0300GMT (which was 19/06/2000, 14:37 +0100GMT for me), you wrote: ST> HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\RIT\The Bat!\Empty Subject Warning ST> registry key value should be set to 1... just an idea: could you make it a macro? that way we can use it on folder-

Re: Reading confirmation

Hello Graham, GF> TB! never has acknowledged MS-Exchange generated read-receipt GF> notification. This beta also ignores the read receipt stuff. Is this GF> a MS-ignoring-the-standards issue? GF> Example header info included I am afraid, I don't quite understand you. What do you do