-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: MD5
Hello Nick!
NA> I am including a small jpeg image of what Outlook shows when clicking on
NA> the S/MIME signature, as I think it much more informative than what TB!
NA> shows you. I am also including a jpeg image of TB!'s version of the same
NA> for c
Hello Marck,
MDP> ... Except where it was already correct. Now it is broken - I only get
MDP> to about 55% when the download is complete. :-(((
Do you keep messages on the server?
Do you have any Selective download filters set up?
What is the total download size?
I have this thingie working a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 18 July 2000 Curtis wrote:
> Would you care to explain that. I use version 6.5.3 of PGP and I use
> S/MIME.
I don't doubt. As I said, I *could* have the wrong end of the stick
completely. (I am using 6.0, not 6.5, though. I don't know what
Hi Ulrich,
On 19 July 2000 at 00:16:41 GMT -0300 (which was 04:16 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points on the subject
of "no privite key..":
UP> (you were talking about the notaries...)
MDP>> I have found one in the nearest major town to me. His charges
MDP>> seem reaso
Hi Thomas,
On 19 July 2000 at 11:47:22 GMT +0800 (which was 04:47 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points on the subject
of "attachments":
TF> What is this about, since when do we send attachments to this ML, and
TF> how do I open it?
We're all testing the latest beta
Hi TBBETA,
I just came back from a four-week vacation and found that about half
of all message in this list have attachments called "smime.p7s" now.
Nick's message below is just an example, and I enclose the attachment.
(Why? You have received it as well.)
What is this about, since when do we se
Hello Marck,
(you were talking about the notaries...)
MDP> I have found one in the nearest major town to me. His charges seem
MDP> reasonable (5 pounds sterling). I may get in touch and make the 10
MDP> mile trip :-).
before going on this trip, check with him if he is alone, or if there
Hi Marck,
On 18 July 2000 at 17:16:30 GMT +0100 Marck D. Pearlstone
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote about "I think I'm missing out on the
party.." and made these points:
DE>> It's proberly just me with my settings or that I am still on B5
Better than the RTFM. Again as usual.
MDP> See release announ
Hi Curtis,
On 19 July 2000 at 20:12:20 GMT -0500 (which was 02:12 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points on the subject
of "Bad certs":
C>>> How does one go about getting another users certificate in
C>>> their address book?
NA>> If you go to your TBBETA and TBDUDL
Hi Ron,
On 19 July 2000 at 22:17:00 GMT -0400 (which was 03:17 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points on the subject
of "S/MIME without Revealing Personal Data":
RM> I looked at thawte.com's site and they ask for a lot of personal
RM> information to provide a certificate.
R
I looked at thawte.com's site and they ask for a lot of personal
information to provide a certificate.
Is it possible to use TB's new S/MIME support for encryption without
having to give age, social security number, etc.? All I would like to
be able to do is encrypt messages, not have the messag
Hi Nick,
On 19 July 2000 at 17:44:36 GMT -0700 (which was 01:44 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points on the subject
of "no privite key..":
MDP>>> Is this certificate any more valid?
MDP>> Nope. Any thoughts anyone?
NA> Well, in the case of an "Invalid Signature" it's not
On Tue, 18 Jul 2000 17:34:16 -0700, Nick Andriash wrote:
C>> How does one go about getting another users certificate in
C>> their address book?
NA> If you go to your TBBETA and TBDUDL Filters, go to the Actions tab, and
NA> choose "Add address(es) to Address Book". From that point on, wh
Hello Curtis,
C> On Tue, 18 Jul 2000 16:34:54 -0700, Nick Andriash wrote:
NA>> Exactly. Max was mentioning that if you set your "Actions" in the
NA>> Filtering dialogue box so that the Senders address is automatically
NA>> entered in your Address Book, then every time someone sends you a signed
N
On Tuesday, July 18, 2000, 2:19:30 AM, Marck D. Pearlstone wrote:
MDP>> Is this certificate any more valid?
MDP> Nope. Any thoughts anyone?
Well, in the case of an "Invalid Signature" it's not the Certificate's
validity that is being questioned, but rather the integrity of the
message contents.
On Tuesday, July 18, 2000, 4:47:32 PM, Curtis wrote:
C> How does one go about getting another users certificate in their
C> address book?
If you go to your TBBETA and TBDUDL Filters, go to the Actions tab, and
choose "Add address(es) to Address Book". From that point on, whenever
someon
Servus Leif,
Am 19.07.2000 so gegen 00:00 meintest Du:
> Your message to the list shows that somewhere along the line (outside
> your computers, and further down the line than your SMTP server, but
> before your POP3 server), some server is munging the message.
Now this would be rather easy to
This message: 18/07/2000 19:35 GMT.
Hello David,
On 18 July 2000 at 16:59:44 GMT +0100 (which was 16:59 where I live)
David ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) typed:
DE> The cert's allways look like this good or bad.
Thats because your using beta 5 and it's not implemented in that.
Try Beta 9... Ooops so
Dear Leif,
LG> You guys are geniuses! :-)
Well, we are phenomenally modest to confirm this :-)
LG> Is this a cert problem or a TB problem? Can it be fixed?
Fixed already (as you can see in Beta/10 :-)
--
Sincerely,
Stefanmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
..."In spite of
On Tuesday, July 18, 2000, 5:51:17 AM, Johannes M. Posel wrote:
JMP> I just saw that since the introduction of S/MIME support, whenever
JMP> you
JMP> make a new message or reply, in the Privacy menu of the Editor there
JMP> is both PGP *and* S/MIME selected ("Apply when cpmpleted"? What does
JMP>
Hello Ulrich,
Tuesday, July 18, 2000, you wrote to me:
MM>>> [*] Re-organized "Privacy" menu in Message Editor.
PG>> "Encrypt when Completed" and "Sign when Completed" are not working
PG>> from "Privacy" menu in Message Editor anymore.
UP> Seems to works here... the items are grayed out by def
Hi David,
On 18 July 2000 at 16:59:44 GMT +0100 (which was 16:59 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points on the subject
of "I think I'm missing out on the party..":
LG>>> Hmmm, it should look like the attached image.
DE> It doesn't.
DE> The cert's allways look like this goo
On Tuesday, July 18, 2000, 8:38:12 AM, Maxim Masiutin wrote:
MM> [-] Fixed checkboxes in Editor Options of Account|Properties.
Nicely done people! Thank you very much. :o)
MM> [*] Re-organized "Privacy" menu in Message Editor.
Yes, again very nicely done. I was wondering however if you could t
Hi All,
On 18 July 2000 at 11:29:19 GMT +0100 Tony Boom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote about "I think I'm missing out on the party.." and made these
points:
Now I know what you are talking about. Thanks for the image.
LG>> Hmmm, it should look like the attached image.
It doesn't.
The cert's allway
On Tue, 18 Jul 2000 08:41:12 +0100, Graham Foster wrote:
GF> WHAT LITTLE YELLOW ICON! I've read all these messages, and I cannot
GF> find a single yellow icon anywhere. I've checked my setting so
GF> that all the message flags are displayed, as is message priority and
GF> colour group. What else
Aye Curtis!
On Tuesday, July 18, 2000 at 05:16:15 GMT -0500 (which was 3:16 AM where you think
I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed:
C> On Tue, 18 Jul 2000 00:49:46 -0700, phil wrote:
p>> I try going to ACCOUNT |PROPERTIES |GENERAL |edit VCF card |
p>> Certificates | IMPORT and I point that pup
This message: 18/07/2000 11:24 GMT.
Hello Leif,
On 18 July 2000 at 17:21:48 GMT +0900 (which was 09:21 where I live)
Leif ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) typed:
LG> Hmmm, it should look like the attached image.
You seem to be the first to sign a message that includes an
attachment.
You signature sh
This message: 18/07/2000 11:17 GMT.
Hello Leif,
On 18 July 2000 at 17:12:43 GMT +0900 (which was 09:12 where I live)
Leif ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) typed:
LG> Heheh... Looks like we're all answering ourselves today! I just
LG> figured out how to do it again, so never mind! :-)
Yes, this talking to
This message: 18/07/2000 10:00 GMT.
Hello Alexander,
On 18 July 2000 at 04:03:09 GMT +0400 (which was 01:03 where I live)
Alexander ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) typed:
AD> Yes, but it is a pleasant toy. Agree,
I have to agree with that. After all the agro I've had getting TB to
work properly again
This message: 18/07/2000 11:09 GMT.
Hello Graham,
On 18 July 2000 at 08:41:12 GMT +0100 (which was 08:41 where I live)
Graham ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) typed:
GF> WHAT LITTLE YELLOW ICON! I've read all these messages, and I cannot
GF> find a single yellow icon anywhere
Well at the moment 99% of all
This message: 18/07/2000 10:44 GMT.
Hello Nick,
On 18 July 2000 at 21:09:36 GMT -0700 (which was 05:09 where I live)
Nick ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) typed:
NA> Hmmm? Well, I don't know what to say Allie... I copied my password to
NA> the clipboard and know it's there (tested it in a blank message and a
On Mon, 17 Jul 2000 21:09:36 -0700, Nick Andriash wrote:
NA> Hmmm? Well, I don't know what to say Allie... I copied my password
NA> to the clipboard and know it's there (tested it in a blank message
NA> and also my external text editor), but those right click options are
NA> grayed out for me whe
On Tue, 18 Jul 2000 10:19:30 +0100, Marck D. Pearlstone wrote:
MDP>> Is this certificate any more valid?
MDP> Nope. Any thoughts anyone?
Not sure exactly what you're comparing. The certificate as we
use it, with our names not attached, seem to only certify that the
message is coming fro
On Tue, 18 Jul 2000 00:49:46 -0700, phil wrote:
p> I try going to ACCOUNT |PROPERTIES |GENERAL |edit VCF card |
p> Certificates | IMPORT and I point that puppy to the Thawrt.txt (I
p> just showed you above)
p> I get a message:
p> (the file i:\z\desktop\Thawrt.txt is either corrupt or not a va
Hi Leif,
On 18 July 2000 at 17:21:48 GMT +0900 (which was 09:21 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points on the subject
of "I think I'm missing out on the party..":
LG> Hmmm, it should look like the attached image. Maybe it is being
LG> stripped by your mail server. I can't se
Hi Marck,
(There's a lot of talkings to self in the list at the moment).
On 18 July 2000 at 09:57:10 GMT +0100 (which was 09:57 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points on the subject
of "no privite key..":
MDP> Well, it said "OK" in the outbox. My copy of the message in Tras
Hi Stefan,
On 11 July 2000 at 17:44:00 GMT +0300 (which was 15:44 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points on the subject
of "1.45 Beta/6 is now available":
ST> [*] Calculation of POP/SMTP total/downloaded/transeffered sizes
ST> is now more correct
... Except where it was
Hi Leif,
On 18 July 2000 at 16:29:09 GMT +0900 (which was 08:29 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points on the subject
of "no privite key..":
MDP>> I get the feeling I need to talk to *someone* to test this!
LG> I was looking at your certificate, and it says that it's bad.
L
Hello,
When I export messages and TB finish it, I click to messages windows
and hit "Home" key. Nothing happens. When I hit "down" or "up"
arrow, selected message is grayed now, but still doesn't work. When I
click to some message again, "Home" works.
--
Thanks and Bye,
Marek Mikus
U
Hello Juergen Frisch
> On Tuesday, July 18, 2000, 10:05, Graham Foster wrote:
>>> It should appear just like a file attachment-- split message pane
>>> with the yellow OK/BAD stamp looking thingy in the left hand pane.
>> No attachments at all.. no local .BMP files either :-(
> Hello Graham,
On Tuesday, July 18, 2000, 10:05, Graham Foster wrote:
>> It should appear just like a file attachment-- split message pane
>> with the yellow OK/BAD stamp looking thingy in the left hand pane.
> No attachments at all.. no local .BMP files either :-(
Hello Graham,
did you check View | Attac
41 matches
Mail list logo
