Re[2]: S/MIME encryption problems

p>> I hear from Nick (thanks for the help BTW), there's a Private Key p>> Box? Where? not in my Address book or the VCard LG> I believe the private key box is the one mentioned in the step where LG> you are exporting the key from the browser. heh, the only dialog I had was asking for a password

Re: S/MIME encryption problems

Hello Leif, On Tue, 25 Jul 2000 10:48:20 +0900GMT (25/07/2000, 09:48 +0800GMT), Leif Gregory wrote: p>> Does JAVA have anything to do with it? p>> Cookies? p>> Active-X? LG> All this stuff is enabled on my machine, so I can't tell you. You serious? Java and Cookies need confirmation before

Re: S/MIME encryption problems

phil, I hate it when I do that.. Here is the attachment that was supposed to go with the last message. Leif Gregory -- TBUDL/TBBETA List Moderator ICQ 216395 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Web Site TBUDL FAQ Using The Bat! 1.45 S/M

Re: S/MIME encryption problems

phil, On Tuesday, July 25, 2000, at 10:07 AM you wrote: p> I need to have ***ALL*** these questions answered p> History: In order to impliment S/MIME It was my understanding that p> all one had to do was browse to thawte, apply for a key, export it p> from the browser to a file called pfx.pfx Im

Re[2]: S/MIME encryption problems

I need to have ***ALL*** these questions answered History: In order to impliment S/MIME It was my understanding that all one had to do was browse to thawte, apply for a key, export it from the browser to a file called pfx.pfx Import pfx.pfx to the VCard, Create a new contact(ie. you) under TRUSTE

Re[2]: S/MIME encryption problems

Aye Nick! On Monday, July 24, 2000 at 14:35:08 GMT -0700 (which was 2:35 PM where you think I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed: NA> On Monday, July 24, 2000, 11:42:14 AM, phil wrote: p>> I see NO little keys, (like say in the "PGP Keymanager Window") none p>> at all. There are icons (Actually

Re: S/MIME encryption problems

On Monday, July 24, 2000, 11:42:14 AM, phil wrote: p> I see NO little keys, (like say in the "PGP Keymanager Window") none p> at all. There are icons (Actually the resource files inside p> thebat.exe) that appear to symbolize a piece of paper meaning " A p> CONTACT " at least that's what they loo

Re: SOT : Trustcenter's certificate not trusted ???

On Monday, July 24, 2000, 11:43:49 AM, Rob wrote: R> no, i signed up for the Trustcenter certificate with the other address ; i R> never transferred it .. Ok, now you have me confused. Is the address listed with your Trustcenter Certificate: [EMAIL PROTECTED] which I note is the address attach

Re: "Bad" certificate is valid?

On Monday, July 24, 2000, 11:18:08 AM, Thomas Fernandez wrote: TF> No, you're not in my address book. Is that a requriement for TF> certificates? Furthermore, you psoted two messages on the lsit, one TF> was "bad", the other "OK". Don't make no sense to me, sugar. I don't know if not having my n

Re[2]: S/MIME encryption problems

p>> Now the bad news: p>> Still can't send S/MIME I get a pop-up that says: p>> Please select default signing certificate for [EMAIL PROTECTED] . A p>> certificate must contain a private key. NA> When you imported your Certificate, did you also include your Private NA> Key? When viewing your C

Re[2]: SOT : Trustcenter's certificate not trusted ???

Hi Nick, Monday, July 24, 2000, 7:52:15 PM, you wrote: > Ah... that may be the problem... as I don't think the Certificates are > transferable from address to address. no, i signed up for the Trustcenter certificate with the other address ; i never transferred it ... > I kind of think the fact

Re: "Bad" certificate is valid?

Hello Curtis, On Mon, 24 Jul 2000 13:12:06 -0500 GMT (25/07/00, 02:12 +0800 GMT), Curtis wrote: TF>> If the line length is not responsible, I am surprised that that TF>> particular message arrived with a Bad signature here and OK at you TF>> end. C> I don't know. It's most likely a pro

Re: "Bad" certificate is valid?

Hello Nick, On Mon, 24 Jul 2000 10:55:13 -0700 GMT (25/07/00, 01:55 +0800 GMT), Nick Andriash wrote: TF>> The "message viewer" you refer to is TB. If the line length is not TF>> responsible, I am surprised that that particular message arrived with a TF>> Bad signature here and OK at you end. NA

Re: Bug report, cursor freezing

Hello Chris, On Mon, 24 Jul 2000 14:41:26 +0100 GMT (24/07/00, 21:41 +0800 GMT), Chris Wilson wrote: CW> Is there any reason not to overwrite the beta I am using with the CW> release version? I may try and see if this fixes the cursor problem if CW> it's deemed safe. Applied for my registration

Re: "Bad" certificate is valid?

On Tue, 25 Jul 2000 01:42:18 +0800, Thomas Fernandez wrote: C>> It could have been, and the fact that you're message viewer C>> window wraps lines doesn't mean that it interferes with the C>> formatting since hard returns aren't used to produce that effect. C>> It's the formatting that ha

Re: "Bad" certificate is valid?

On Monday, July 24, 2000, 10:42:18 AM, Thomas Fernandez wrote: TF> The "message viewer" you refer to is TB. If the line length is not TF> responsible, I am surprised that that particular message arrived with a TF> Bad signature here and OK at you end. Just out of curiosity, check to see if I am

Re: SOT : Trustcenter's certificate not trusted ???

On Monday, July 24, 2000, 4:15:31 AM, Rob wrote: R> but when i 'view' those R> entries (their cerificate and my key) under 'edit vCard' certificates, they R> both show up 'invalid' (they are for another e-mail address btw). Ah... that may be the problem... as I don't think the Certificates are t