-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Alastair!
On Thursday, October 04, 2001 at 7:04:25 PM you wrote:
> (On the home machine, with XP, there is no problem - so far - with the
> font reverting to Times New Roman, or whatever; on the work machine,
> with 95, there is, and that's wh
Hello Syafril,
On Fri, 5 Oct 2001 10:19:12 +0700GMT (05/10/2001, 11:19 +0800GMT),
Syafril Hermansyah wrote:
SH> Till now, I really like the way MDaemon DomainPOP Engine to handle
SH> this stuff :
SH> - at first, MDaemon will issue UIDL (instead of STAT as TB! did on
SH> normal mode), to
Hi All,
On Fri, 5 Oct 2001 at 02:03:02 GMT +0800 (10/5/2001 1:03 AM GMT +0700
where you think I live) "Thomas F"=[TF] typed the following :
[ ... ]
TF> Ok, so I need to set "Leave" in order to not get the dupes?
I think so because only on this mode TB! will use UIDL approach.
TF> I don't u
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thursday, October 04, 2001 at 12:12:13 AM ,
Thomas F wrote about "Downloading mail - suggestion":
> I don't use a crappy dial-up network connection
Mine isn't either, usually, but sometimes, heat may make the
copper to expand, rain may get some wate
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Dean,
On Thu, 4 Oct 2001 07:08:04 -0500 GMT (04/10/2001, 20:08 +0800 GMT),
Dean wrote:
D> I get 1-2 mg a download daily. No problems with Norton AV or
D> F-Secure.
Your downloads come in milligrams? SCNR.
- --
Cheers,
Thomas.
Moderator der
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Alexander,
On Thu, 4 Oct 2001 19:43:45 +0600 GMT (04/10/2001, 21:43 +0800 GMT),
Alexander Leschinsky wrote:
TF>> One of the servers where I distinctly remember that I
TF>> redownloaded tens of messages each time, was GMX Free, on which I
TF>>
AS> PAVT runs a real-time 'email and Internet' virus checker (transparent -
AS> it doesn't interpose its own POP3 server like Norton Anti-Virus)
you might try NAV 2002 it no longer does that, it just scans any files
coming into the computer via the POP3 protocol, and does it really
fast I might
On 4 October 2001 at 3:40 pm Dierk wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
> Hello Alastair!
> On Thursday, October 04, 2001 at 1:52:26 PM you wrote:
>> That system instability suggests there's something pretty nasty
>> somewhere ...
> I tried to re-enact what you did, but co
Hello Thomas,
On Sat, 29 Sep 2001 20:59:09 +0800 (29.09.2001 18:59 my local time)
you wrote about "Certificates Missing",
at least in part:
TF> OK, I get this. But my real question is: why are some signatures valid
TF> in beta/8 and not in beta/9? Why does the trust change depending on
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Dean!
On Thursday, October 04, 2001 at 2:08:04 PM you wrote:
> I get 1-2 mg a download daily. No problems with Norton AV or
> F-Secure.
For F-Secure checking e-mail, what did you do? If it is the Gatekeeper
option, I had to disable this since
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Alastair!
On Thursday, October 04, 2001 at 1:52:26 PM you wrote:
> That system instability suggests there's something pretty nasty
> somewhere ...
I tried to re-enact what you did, but couldn't. Maybe I did something
wrong. But I found out th
Hello Thomas,
On Thu, 4 Oct 2001 11:32:49 +0800 (04.10.2001 09:32 my local time)
you wrote about "Downloading mail - suggestion",
at least in part:
TF> Is this a recent improvement?
No :-)! I can't recall, when it appear - it was "ancient times"
TF> Since I use cable, I don't use the
Hello Alastair,
On Thursday, October 04, 2001 10:00:25 [ +0100 GMT], you
wrote the following in regards to 'Crashes of real-time
anti-virus checker':
Alastair> I'm having a problem with The Bat! (1.53t and 1.54 betas 8 and 9
Alastair> verified) and Panda Antivirus Titanium [...]
Panda crashed
13 matches
Mail list logo
