Hello Quin,
18. marec 2002, 23:15:48, you wrote:
QS I *have* noticed but, strangely, it has been only your own posts that
QS have been consistently duplicated on my system (or at least they are the
QS only ones I notice). I'd thought about telling you but didn't. Now, your
QS messages are no
Hello Dwight,
I don't think TB should be released with a faulty import tool.
You may be right, but to me the import tool is just something a few
people might use once, and even fewer might use regularly, while there
You are right. And if these people that use TB! for the first time
cannot
Hello Allie,
18. marec 2002, 21:23:39, you wrote:
ACM You *need* this and yet the mighty *Agent* cough (I do like Agent a
ACM lot but gee) doesn't support it?? Surely it couldn't be that necessary
ACM then? ducking
That's why I started using Gravity (but I don't use it anymore, as I'm
Tuesday, March 19, 2002, 12:37:30 PM, Jernej Simonèiè wrote:
That's why I started using Gravity (but I don't use it anymore, as I'm
betatesting something better).
Aha! What are you betatesting ?
--
George M. Menegakis, System Network Administration
Using The BAT! v1.54 Beta/50
on
On Monday, March 18, 2002, 1:23:49 PM, Stefan Tanurkov wrote:
ST [*] Loading is speeded up in RTV
Confirmed! It's noticeably faster now, especially for relatively complex HTML
messages. (Hooray, I can read my junk mail faster! :))
- Paul
--
Using The Bat! v1.54 Beta/50 S/N FCADE557
on
Hello Paul A. Thiessen,
On Tuesday, March 19 2002 at 04:27 AM PDT, you wrote:
Confirmed! It's noticeably faster now, especially for relatively
complex HTML messages. (Hooray, I can read my junk mail faster! :))
Yup! That's about it! ;o)
--
Nick Andriash
Courtenay, B.C. Canada
--
Hi,
I know IMAP is not the Bat's forte but it got worse during this beta
cycle. Is it really going to remain like that?
Regards,
Markus
--
He's dead, Jim. -- McCoy, The Devil in the Dark, stardate 3196.1
Using The Bat! 1.54 Beta/50 under Windows NT 4.0
Build 1381 Service Pack 6
--
Hello Markus
How is the IMAP any worse than it has been up until now?
regards,
Graham
Using The Bat! 1.54 Beta/50
under Windows NT 4.0
(Build 1381, Service Pack 6)
--
_
Archives : http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com
On Tuesday, March 19, 2002 Peter Palmreuther wrote:
CT Yes, but why don't you agree with me that -- in QP isn't a correct
CT signature delimiter?
In fact I do :-)
OK. Maybe you are right... maybe it's not a correct
signature delimiter in QP... I don't care. All I want is an
option to see
Hello Jacek,
On Tuesday, March 19, 2002 at 2:43:14 PM you wrote in
msgid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (at least in part):
JW OK. Maybe you are right... maybe it's not a correct
JW signature delimiter in QP... I don't care. All I want is an
JW option to see those double signatures with the font/color
JW I
Hello Jernej
You wrote On Tue, 19 Mar 2002, at 11:30:04 [GMT +0100] (21:30 Tuesday where I live):-
Are you sure, you didn't get some messages twice? I noticed unread
messages in some folders, too, but they were all duplicates, which I
received again for some reason (they were also visible
Hi all,
Well, with Beta 50, I discover that I can once more import messages
from Outlook Express 6.0... as long as OE6 is closed when I try to
import. This limitation did not exist in Beta 39. I don't know if this
was the bug I encountered from 40-49.
I now see a new interface with some
On Tuesday, March 19, 2002 David van Zuijlekom wrote:
Shift + Space bar
is much easier and I would really like to see it in a next
beta/release.
Totally agree about that. Shift-Space is more intuitive.
regards,
--
/\_/\ A better way to DoubleSpace your disk: DEL C:\WINDOWS\*.*
Hi everybody
On Tue, 19 Mar 2002 16:18:00 -0500GMT
(which was 19/03/2002, 22:18 +0200GMT for me),
you wrote:
JW Now how about that screen shot WITHOUT TB cluttering up the background?? g
if anyone else want's it, it's on
http://www.geocities.com/coffeejunk/index2.html
--
Der Immer
Hello Konstantin,
On Tuesday, March 19, 2002, 2:15:17 PM, you wrote:
K but when I press abort button in CC, and then try to check the mail
K on same account once more, nothing happens(BTW,only with account
K with IMAP) Anyone else?
Yes, from time to time. But haven't been able to consistently
Outlook and TB used to fight over associations every time one was
opened after the other had been in use. Well, actually Outlook
didn't fight; it just quietly stole. Then TB would fight back after
it was reopened.
Quite suddenly, this behavior has stopped, and opening Outlook no
longer causes
Hi Everybody
JW Now how about that screen shot WITHOUT TB cluttering up the background?? g
R if anyone else want's it, it's on
R http://www.geocities.com/coffeejunk/index2.html
it can be that you get a 'bandwith exceeded message'... just try
tomorrow...
damn, I didn't think it would have that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Dierk,
@18 March 2002, 23:53:49 +0100 (22:53 UK time) Dierk Haasis wrote in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you want to delete one message and not the entire thread then a
separate key sequence is needed.
Nope, you don't *need* it. See what Agent
Hello all,
Tuesday, March 19, 2002, Stefan Tanurkov wrote:
ST 1.54 RC/1 is now available from
Do You plan to solve bugreports in bugtraq before final release?
Following bugs are not in BT, I didn't added them there.
1) I backuped whole installation with registry and installed complete
new
On Tuesday, March 19, 2002, at 6:54:58 PM, Stefan Tanurkov spewed forth
what is below:
1.54 RC/1 is now available from
http://www.ritlabs.com/the_bat/beta.html
Bugs are still in there. Why don't you discuss with the testers whether
THEY think it's finally bug-free?
- selection in the editor
Hi Stefan
On Tue, 19 Mar 2002 19:54:58 +0200 (19.03.02 18:54 local time)
you wrote in msgid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
[-] Cutting the quoted text at the last signature to avoid confusion
with highlighted signature in RTV
It's still confusing when you see i.e.
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You
Hello The Bat! developers,
I'm using The Bat! Version 1.54 RC/1
Serial Number 4B8FB535
under Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2
and would like to report a bug
The bug description:
mailto:; not recognized
Steps to reproduce the bug:
I got a mail with a mailto
Hello The Bat! developers,
I'm using The Bat! Version 1.54 RC/1
Serial Number 4B8FB535
under Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2
and would like to report a bug
The bug description:
There is a scroll or a missing scroll bar problem in the editor
window.
Steps to
Not really a bug. This is because the cursor IS in an empty area and there is
nothing to scroll! When you then type a character, the scroll bar appears. This
is the nature of a free cursor editor which allows you to cursor even where
there isn't already text. You can also see this by cursoring in
Hello Martin
You wrote On Wed, 20 Mar 2002, at 05:41:04 [GMT +0100] (15:41 Wednesday where I
live):-
Steps to reproduce the bug:
I got a mail with a mailto reference which theta! doesn't
recognize as EMail address, example see below:
Send us a mail [mailto:[EMAIL
Dear Stefan,
to be serious, Ritlabs will not release 1.54 with major bugs in the
HTML engine not fixed, though numerous times reported to Max and Diman
(SPACER tag bug, font size bug), or will you ?
What I'm talking about is we should stop any beta testing if you
and/or your crew do not listen
Hello MaXxX!
On Wednesday, March 20, 2002 at 1:22:08 AM you wrote:
Bugs are still in there. Why don't you discuss with the testers whether
THEY think it's finally bug-free?
Haven't you been reading the list for the last few days?
Although I am not associated with RITLabs, I tried exactly
Hello Peter!
On Wednesday, March 20, 2002 at 8:00:26 AM you wrote:
What I'm talking about is we should stop any beta testing if you
and/or your crew do not listen to reports sent by your customers.
To my experience they listen. As is proven by this very beta series
which was continued due to
28 matches
Mail list logo
