Re: Unable to empty trash

2003-08-28 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Thomas, On Wed, 27 Aug 2003 23:44:54 +0700 GMT (27/08/2003, 23:44 +0700 GMT), Thomas Fernandez wrote: > But: why are message up to four days old still in the trash folder? > They should have been deleted when I changed the setting to 0 days. > and that's certainly a bug. > I will check tom

Re[2]: The Bat! v2.0 Beta/5

2003-08-28 Thread Eric Malaussena
Hi Edvinas, On Thursday, August 28, 2003 at 6:21:52 AM, you wrote : EM> In fact č isn't cyrillic character. It is latin based and is used in some EM> Central and Eastern European languages such as Czech, Slovenian, Slovakian, EM> Lithuanian etc. You're rigth. Thx ;-) EM> I believe that instead

Re: [real] Re: Search...

2003-08-28 Thread Greg Strong
Hello Quin, > I don't have much experience using the id numbers. Well if you did save them, then clicking on a ID # preceded by 'mid:' would take you to the message. > Is there somewhere else, some archive, where I can find the message > and thread you refer to or am I just out of luck? Just fo

Re: [real] Search...

2003-08-28 Thread Greg Strong
Hello Quin, >> I want a "search all accounts"-button... What was wrong with the old >> search? > I agree; that's some step backwards. I need to search across folders > and accounts. I agree for the option to select all accounts. > Surely I must be missing something obvious to others? I don't t

Re: [real] Re: Search...

2003-08-28 Thread Quin Selman
Hello Martin, Wednesday, August 27, 2003, 11:28:02 AM, you wrote: >> I want a "search all accounts"-button... What was wrong with the old >> search? > CTRL-Click will help... > But see whole thread starting with mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] I don't have much experience using the id numbers. I've on

Re: [real] Search...

2003-08-28 Thread Quin Selman
Hello Thorvald, Wednesday, August 27, 2003, 5:31:53 AM, you wrote: > I want a "search all accounts"-button... What was wrong with the old > search? I agree; that's some step backwards. I need to search across folders and accounts. In the new search dialog, I can't even find a way to globally ch

IMAP

2003-08-28 Thread Joseph N.
I'd like to start exploring IMAP. Until now I just have not paid attention to IMAP-related threads. I'm willing to do some catch-up, but--by way of starting out--would someone tell me which Beta was the first to utilize IMAP protocol reliably (assuming that reliability has been achieved)? Also, I'd

Re[2]: NOOP (IMAP)

2003-08-28 Thread Stefan Tanurkov
Hello Arnd, Tuesday, August 26, 2003, 9:43:38 AM, you wrote: The server says: AB> S: * 4 FETCH (UID 4 FLAGS (\Seen)) So, there is a message with UID 4 in the mailbox. TB! wants to retrieve the message's AB> C: U00018 UID FETCH 4 (BODY) And the server replies: AB> S: U00018 BAD UID command in

Re: Access Violation on deleting/wiping folder, 2.0 b5

2003-08-28 Thread Wolffe
Greetings BatPeople, Wednesday, August 27, 2003, 4:31:50 PM, Anne wrote: A> Tuesday, August 26, 2003, 5:52:34 PM, Doug wrote: DW>> Tried to delete/wipe a folder, got Access Violation at DW>> 004041D4 in Module thebat.exe read of address 0036 A> Confirmed, I also get Access Violation de

Re: cpu 99%

2003-08-28 Thread Wolffe
Greetings BatPeople, Wednesday, August 27, 2003, 8:18:25 AM, Davide wrote: DF> Hi... DF> It seems that TB 20 beta 2 to 5 uses 99% of CPU time... DF> But normal operations are executed normally DF> Is it only a "nominal" 99% or the CPU is really doing something when DF> the bat is running? W