Re: Windows NT/2000/XP user directories and registry keys.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi TBBETA, On Mon, 10 Nov 2003, at 22:48:37 [GMT +0100] (which was 1:48 PM where I live) you wrote: N> Ritlabs it's doing a Windows XP re-design of the gui. Nice! N> What about the use of Documents & Settings folder for user accounts N> instead o

Re: cannot navigate properly from one particular folder

Hi MaXxX, Monday, November 10, 2003, 11:42:54 PM, you wrote: M> On Monday, November 10, 2003, at 2:01:10 PM, Yuki Taga has typed M> the following text: >> NEXT unread is always that, the NEXT unread. It should have no >> connection with PREVIOUS unreads, whether they exist or not. I want >> to m

Windows NT/2000/XP user directories and registry keys.

Ritlabs it's doing a Windows XP re-design of the gui. What about the use of Documents & Settings folder for user accounts instead of Program Files/The Bat!/Mail. The same question for the keys of the registry in HKEY_CURRENT_USER. Common configuration should go to HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE

Re: backup in TB! -> restore in SecureLite fails + another bug

If there is no custom folder restored from TB! in SecureLite, I decided to import them: menu 'import <> from The Bat! base'. All import was completed and new folder was filled with new messages. But this new folder disappeared after restart of Secure Lite! ... :-o ... please confirm ...

Re: cannot navigate properly from one particular folder

On Monday, November 10, 2003, at 2:01:10 PM, Yuki Taga has typed the following text: > NEXT unread is always that, the NEXT unread. It should have no > connection with PREVIOUS unreads, whether they exist or not. I want > to move to the NEXT unread, regardless of what other unreads exist > in the

Re: POP3 mail stuck

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Barnabas, On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 10:23:50 +0100 (4:23 AM here), Barnabas BONA [BB] wrote in : >> Just out of curiosity, are you running any plug-ins in The Bat! or >> any mail relays? BB> Yes, an anti-spam plugin, BayesIT 0.4g

Re[2]: POP3 mail stuck

Hello John, Sunday (November 9, 2003, 1:46 PM) you wrote: BB>> Can anyone confirm it? JT> Confirmed here too. JT> Using BayesIt! .04gm. and Spam Pal BTW SpamPal with BayesIt works great, except for this error we are discussing. If Spam Pal misses, Bayes filter gets it, usually with zero fals