Hello Manuel!
On Saturday, April 17, 2004 at 8:57:46 PM you wrote:
The problem is that ) interpretation depends on the
characters after it and that TB! doesn't take ( as a valid
character, so there's a lack of consistency.
Right. You're good. :-)
--
Dierk Haasis
The Bat 2.10 on
Good discussion.
John wrote:
Many ways to do this. First, if I am going to go anywhere among
civilization and need to be 'connected' I'll have the notebook since
there is only so much I want to fool with when it entails 'jot' or
other PITA keyboard substitutes.
:) I have thought the same
Hello,
Sunday, April 18, 2004, 12:22:08 AM, you wrote:
PG 2. Clicking the link at the bottom of the message which was scrolled
PG down has an effect of selecting and scrolling up instead of opening
PG the page. It happens only once per message though. Very strange and
PG annoying behavior.
Hello Ian,
Sunday, April 18, 2004, 9:49:17 AM, you wrote (possibly edited):
On Sunday, April 18, 2004, 3:56:52 PM, you (Costas Papadopoulos)
wrote:
I just tried this with 2.10.01 and the tool dip is fully displayed
here.
In my case it's still partly shown if The Bat is maximised. It
Hæ!
Sunday, April 18, 2004, 00:22, Peter Gannushkin wrote:
1. Just look at the attached image. Somehow that button got the
gradient color pattern which looks really ugly. The top menu got this
ugly gradient as well.
Not confirmed.
--
Kveðja!
Thorvald Neumann | aesir media
[The Bat! v2.10.01
Hello MAU,
2. Clicking the link at the bottom of the message which was scrolled
down has an effect of selecting and scrolling up instead of opening
the page. It happens only once per message though. Very strange and
annoying behavior.
Not here.
OK, it has happened just once for the
.: Warsaw/PL, 2004-04-18, 13:28 :.
On Sunday, April 18, 2004 [00:22] Peter Gannushkin wrote:
P 2. Clicking the link at the bottom of the message which was scrolled
P down has an effect of selecting and scrolling up instead of opening
P the page. It happens only once per message
Hello Marta!
On Sunday, April 18, 2004 at 1:30:32 PM you wrote:
Confirmed here as well. Happens both for pure text and html emails. And yes,
it only happens with the messages that have been scrolled down. and yes,
it's annoying ;)
Either I don't understand what to do to get this bug. Or
Hello ken,
Sunday, April 18, 2004, 3:03:09 AM, you wrote:
Many ways to do this. First, if I am going to go anywhere among
civilization and need to be 'connected' I'll have the notebook since
there is only so much I want to fool with when it entails 'jot' or
other PITA keyboard substitutes.
Hello ken,
Sunday, April 18, 2004, 3:03:09 AM, you wrote:
kg True, it could be worse. And yes, RitLabs does seem to work hard at
kg getting releases out. I'd sure love to read some definitive answers
kg to IMAP - not necessarily fixes - just a commitment to what is being
kg addressed, what
Hello Bobi,
Saturday, April 17, 2004, 10:44:47 PM, you wrote:
BJ Click in the mail preview window, and use scroll-up/scroll-down key, the
BJ window will scroll 2 pages or random pages instead of one. Bizarre and
BJ annoying.
BJ Bug exists but no only exists in version 2.10/2.10.01.
I
Hello Dierk,
Sunday, April 18, 2004, 7:50:14 AM, you wrote:
DH Either I don't understand what to do to get this bug. Or I cannot
DH confirm it.
how about this:
BJ Click in the mail preview window, and use scroll-up/scroll-down key, the
BJ window will scroll 2 pages or random pages
Hello Paul!
On Sunday, April 18, 2004 at 2:16:11 PM you wrote:
I found this issue when I tried to read an email that was larger than a
screen...
Same sa before: I am unable to duplicate the behaviour.
--
Dierk Haasis
The Bat 2.10 on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Service Pack 1
Chat info for ICQ,
Question as in subject. I had an impression that VF are only collections
of symbolic links to messages contained in actual folders. It imlies that
msg deleted in actual folder disapperas from VF, but not opposite -
deleting message from VF does NOT delete msg in actual folder.
Am I
Hæ!
Sunday, April 18, 2004, 14:16, Paul Cartwright wrote:
how about this:
BJ Click in the mail preview window, and use
BJ scroll-up/scroll-down key, the
BJ window will scroll 2 pages or random pages instead of one. Bizarre and
BJ annoying.
I found this issue when I tried to read an
Hello David,
On Fri, 16 Apr 2004 19:51:32 +0100 (17.04.2004 0:51 my local time),
received Monday, April 19, 2004 at 0:20:43 +0600,
you wrote about Error sending out a message,
at least in part:
DE I think I have about 60G free on this lap top
But had also slow connection and
Krzysztof Kudlacik, [KK] wrote:
KK According to this logic I have to explode on mine in oreder to
KK lern simple truth that walking on mine field is not healthy way of
KK life (of die) ;)
I think you may be overstating the issue a tad. :)
Prior to using VF's you knew that hitting delete would
Hi all,
In the TB! preferences, under the General tab, there's a setting for
adjusting how VF's are named. I decided to change the '*' to another
character. When I do so, the VF's continue to use the same '*'. A
restart doesn't help and recreating the VF doesn't help either.
Can anyone confirm
On 2004-04-18 (21:01), you wrote:
Yes. I want to find large messages to delete to save space in my
mailbox.
Why cant you use 'view modes' - they are very good for this. ;]
I therefor use the search folder Large messages and when I
have decided what to delete
If you use 'search' option,
Dierk Haasis wrote:
Just to inform us that not everybody has the same priorities. Which
doesn't mean that TB should eventually - not in some indefinite
future - work the same with IMAP as with POP3. My guess is, that it
isn't as easy to implement many of the features TB offers with IMAP.
I
On 2004-04-18 (21:27), you wrote:
There's a pattern, isn't there? :)
The is but it does'nt proof what you want. See below ;]
So, if you delete a message in a VF, what do you think will happen
then?? :) This is why I don't think it's misleading.
Not this way. My preferred way of
Krzysztof Kudlacik, [KK] wrote:
KK I can imagine easylliy, that 'delete from VF' is NOT the same, as
KK 'delete from message base'. This is my point.
I see your point a long time ago. It's just that IMO, it's
inconsistent and I disagree with it. :) I doubt we'll convince each
other so I agree to
On Sunday, April 18, 2004, at 14:32:33 [UTC-0500] (Sunday, April 18, 2004
21:32 my local time) Allie Martin wrote:
In the TB! preferences, under the General tab, there's a setting for
adjusting how VF's are named. I decided to change the '*' to another
character. When I do so, the VF's
Allie Martin wrote:
For an IMAP user having problems with simply reading mail in an IMAP
account then VF's seem insignificant doesn't it? I do see and have
always seen your point though. However, I think Ritlabs may be like
you in that you say here:
J Well, depends on you're perspective. I
On Sunday, April 18, 2004, at 21:36:44 [UTC+0200] (Sunday, April 18, 2004
21:36 my local time) Krzysztof Kudlacik wrote:
Yes. I want to find large messages to delete to save space in my
mailbox.
Why cant you use 'view modes' - they are very good for this. ;]
Unfortunately, View Modes are not
Hi all,
I set up a couple of view modes, but I can't seem to make them stick
to the appropriate folders. No matter if I use Use by or folder
properties to assign them - there is only one view mode here. If I
alter it, it is altered in all folders the same.
Did I overlook a new option Enable View
Hello Manuel,
On Saturday, April 17, 2004 at 20:57 GMT +0200, engineers were awed
when Manuel Diaz constructed:
The problem is that ) interpretation depends on the
characters after it and that TB! doesn't take ( as a valid
character, so there's a lack of consistency.
Sort of veering
On Sunday, April 18, 2004, 23:13, Peter Meyns wrote:
I set up a couple of view modes, but I can't seem to make them stick
to the appropriate folders. No matter if I use Use by or folder
properties to assign them - there is only one view mode here. If I
alter it, it is altered in all folders
Hi Allie,
On Sunday, April 18, 2004 at 14:27 GMT -0500, authorities charged
Allie Martin for writing:
So, if you delete a message in a VF, what do you think will happen
then?? :)
The only thing I find not obvious is that the message will be deleted
according to the deletion settings of the
Hi Allie,
As the 07:10 GMT -0500 on Sunday, April 18, 2004 deadline loomed,
Allie Martin madly pounded out:
I was reading a message that I had to scroll downwards to read
entirely. A URL was in the message towards the end.
What viewer(s) is this happening for? I can't confirm with the PTV.
Ken Green, [KG] wrote:
KG Allie, did you mean that you think RitLabs is currently satisfied
KG with the limited functionality TB provides? That as long as
KG *technically* one can read, send and receive mail using the IMAP
KG protocol, that's good enough for now?
It's difficult to know what is
Starting on Sunday, April 18, 2004 at 2:22 PM, apparently I began
reducing crayon use by typing:
What viewer(s) is this happening for? I can't confirm with the PTV.
The bug does appear here for the HTML viewer.
--
Thanks for writing,
Januk Aggarwal
Using The Bat! 2.10.01 under Windows XP
32 matches
Mail list logo
