Re: V3.0.0.3 Selective Download filter concerns / default settings too aggressive

2004-09-03 Thread Peter Asenbauer
Hi Sean, Friday, September 3, 2004, 8:48:59 AM, you wrote: > My existing selective download filters came across the OFS into the > NFS as complete garbage ... I had to delete them but they didn't kill > all messages. I recreated them (they checked for certain strings to > kill mails to cer

Re: Order of filter actionsd

2004-09-03 Thread MAU
Hello Paul, > When set like the above it does what it's supposed to do, but leaves a > Parked Flagged message in the Inbox also. Is the moved message also parked in the folder it was moved to?. If NFS works as I think it should, it should not be parked. -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Esc

Re: Bat 3.0 Sync with IPAQ Pocket PC

2004-09-03 Thread Tim Casten
Hello Mark, On Friday, September 03, 2004 at 11:43:18 AM you wrote: > In what way would you like to sync TB!? Just Folders and messages. -- Tim Casten,ZDC National Air Traffic Controllers Association Current beta is (none) | 'Using T

Re: TB v3.0 is still a Beta whether RL likes it or not

2004-09-03 Thread MAU
Hello 9Val, M>> 1.- All sub-filters behave as if they had "Continue processing with M>> other filters" selected, but none of them has it. And... > > You are late for one day :) It was fixed yesterday Glad to hear that 9Val. But that doesn't change the fact that the release version available for

Re: Order of filter actionsd

2004-09-03 Thread 9Val
Hello Paul, PFS> If the order of the actions is so important then why is the selection PFS> for Park listed before selection for Flagged? Or have I missed PFS> something? Already fixed -- 9Val

Order of filter actionsd

2004-09-03 Thread Paul F. Siebern
Hello, I have a filer set as follows. Move to folder Dave Park the message Flag the message When set like the above it does what it's supposed to do, but leaves a Parked Flagged message in the Inbox also. Reset the filter to: Move to folder Dave Flag the message Park the message And it works

Re: The Bat 4.0

2004-09-03 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Boris, On Fri, 3 Sep 2004 09:59:50 -0500GMT (3-9-2004, 16:59 +0200, where I live), you wrote: MB>> I trust that support will be there for me, if I need it BG> Ritlabs support? I emailed them several times and got no respond. I can't BG> even be sure it exists. :D I've mailed them once a

Re: TB v3.0 is still a Beta whether RL likes it or not

2004-09-03 Thread MAU
Hello MAU, > I could elaborate a bit more, but I think it is enough for the moment. ... to explain, at least in part, my reaction yesterday. -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v4.123 Beta/Umpteen C

Re: TB v3.0 is still a Beta whether RL likes it or not

2004-09-03 Thread 9Val
Hello MAU, M> 1.- All sub-filters behave as if they had "Continue processing with M> other filters" selected, but none of them has it. And... You are late for one day :) It was fixed yesterday -- 9Val

Re: TB v3.0 is still a Beta whether RL likes it or not

2004-09-03 Thread MAU
Hello MAU, > Later tonight I will report in TBBeta some of the bugs I've found. Almost one day later but here is part of what I found. I accidentally deleted some screen shots I had but I think I can explain what happens without them. Take this set of an Incoming filter and sub-filters (in M

RE:The Bat 4.0

2004-09-03 Thread Jurgen Haug
Hello Boris, Friday, September 3, 2004, 4:59:50 PM, you wrote: > Hello, > Thursday, September 2, 2004, 12:53:21 PM, Mary Bull wrote: MB>> I trust that support will be there for me, if I need it > Ritlabs support? I emailed them several times and got no respond. I can't > even be sure it ex

Re: Bat 3.0 Sync with IPAQ Pocket PC

2004-09-03 Thread Mark Partous
Hello Tim, Friday, September 3, 2004, 2:40:50 PM, you wrote: TC> Anyone have any luck sync-ing their Pocket PC with the Bat? Any TC> Tips? I sync Time & Chaos. But I never tried to sync The Bat! In what way would you like to sync TB!? -- Best Wishes, Mark u

Re: 3.0 Wierdness

2004-09-03 Thread Paul Cartwright
On Thursday, September 2, 2004, 9:24 PM, you wrote: SG> FWIW, In addtion to Avast! and XP as specified in my sig, I'm using K9 SG> 1.29 for SPAM checking, and I have only Avast!'s Plugin Virus Checker SG> enabled, not the Mail Service. thanks for the update, I'm using K9 1.27, time to upgrade! s

Re: Mod: Bad language

2004-09-03 Thread Peter Palmreuther
Hello Dierk, On Thursday, September 2, 2004 at 10:27:53 PM you [DH] wrote (at least in part): >> No, it's because we *are* evil. We always were and always will be. DH> 100% ACK. 0% ACK. Underhanded, insidious, malicious, demonic. These attributes I could live with, but plainly "evil"? What's a

Re: The Bat 4.0

2004-09-03 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Boris! On Friday, September 03, 2004, 9:59 AM, you wrote: MB>> I trust that support will be there for me, if I need it BG> Ritlabs support? I emailed them several times and got no respond. BG> I can't even be sure it exists. :D I am sorry that you have had that bad experience. When I fir

Re: Message forwarding only marks 1 message

2004-09-03 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Graham, On Fri, 3 Sep 2004 15:53:53 +0100GMT (3-9-2004, 16:53 +0200, where I live), you wrote: FG> If you select several messages to be forwarded onto a new recipient, FG> then only 1 (the first one selected I think) gets marked as being FG> forwarded. Not confirmed. When doing a fo

Moving off

2004-09-03 Thread Jan Rifkinson
As a courtesy to all of you who have helped me over the years, a short note of thanks & to say that I'm taking a break from TB! for a variety of reasons. The recent beta/new version/licensing bruhaha sort of turned me off, but more important to me, I wrote two polite requests for information from

Re[2]: The Bat 4.0

2004-09-03 Thread Boris Golberg
Hello, Thursday, September 2, 2004, 12:53:21 PM, Mary Bull wrote: MB> I trust that support will be there for me, if I need it Ritlabs support? I emailed them several times and got no respond. I can't even be sure it exists. :D -- Best regards, Borismailto:[EMAIL