Support of Base64 by BayesIt???

Hello Liste, I have noticed that some completely similar SPAM's are never recognised by BayesIt. In every of this SPAMs is the Link h**p://www.couldga.com/asasee/ Making a Blacklist rule for this chain in body does not catch the SPAM. The body is completely base64 coded and I think, that this pre

Re: Re[4]: mail downlaoded but not saved

Alexander Leschinsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote > > Do you have downloaded (and not stored in The Bat) messages as bat*.tmp > files in your TEMP dir? just checked now, I've got 992 temp files, starting at 21/11/2004 15:59:08 finishing at 23/11/2004 02:10:26 those are just bat.tmp files p

Re[4]: mail downlaoded but not saved

Hello Drago, On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 21:34:10 + (UTC) (23.11.2004 2:34 my local time), received Tuesday, November 23, 2004 at 3:00:03 +0500, you wrote about "mail downlaoded but not saved", at least in part: D> well ive just retried various versions of The Bat!, even rolled back D> to

Re: PGP DLL coming with CKT 6.5.8 build 9 beta 3

"Dierk Haasis" wrotes on 23/11/2004 at 08:50:34 +1100 subject "PGP DLL coming with CKT 6.5.8 build 9 beta 3" : > Hello Hendrik! > On Monday, November 22, 2004 at 10:39:31 PM you wrote: >>> If anybody uses PGP 6.5.8ckt build 09 beta 3 (also shown as beta 2) >>> and has its DLL in TB's main d

Re: PGP DLL coming with CKT 6.5.8 build 9 beta 3

Hello Dierk, A reminder of what Dierk Haasis on TBBETA typed on: 22 November 2004 at 00:18:53 GMT +0100 > The old one dates from February, 22nd, 2000. > The newer one is two years younger: May, 30th, 2002. The one I'm using came from a 4 year old backup, so mathematically we're in the rig

Re: PGP DLL coming with CKT 6.5.8 build 9 beta 3

Hello Tony! On Tuesday, November 23, 2004 at 12:07:27 AM you wrote: > The dll I mean , not PGP itself. I already said I use 6.5.8. How do I find > out what version the dll that Dierk is talking about? The old one dates from February, 22nd, 2000. The newer one is two years younger: May, 30th, 2

Re: NFS: erratic behaviour with subfilters

Hello Maurice, Maurice Snellen wrote (in ): >>> 2) It should be possible to create a purely organizational container >>> level (sub)filter where processing of filters further down the list >>> occurs automatically if none of the subfilters yielded an action. >> If I have u

Re: PGP DLL coming with CKT 6.5.8 build 9 beta 3

Hello Zygmunt, A reminder of what Zygmunt Wereszczynski on TBBETA typed on: 22 November 2004 at 23:35:45 GMT +0100 > Open PGPKeys and then Help / About PGP. The dll I mean , not PGP itself. I already said I use 6.5.8. How do I find out what version the dll that Dierk is talking about? --

Re: PGP DLL coming with CKT 6.5.8 build 9 beta 3

Hello Tony! On Monday, November 22, 2004 at 11:27:33 PM you wrote: > How does one tell? I'm using 6.5.8 with the dll but I can't tell what > version it is. One way is PGPKeys/Help/About. Another: send yourself a signed and encrypted message containing special characters like ä ö ü ß, verify and

Re: PGP DLL coming with CKT 6.5.8 build 9 beta 3

On Monday, November 22, 2004, at 22:27:33 [UTC+] (Monday, November 22, 2004 23:27 my local time) Tony Boom wrote: > How does one tell? I'm using 6.5.8 with the dll but I can't tell what > version it is. Open PGPKeys and then Help / About PGP. -- Best regards, Zygmunt Wereszczynski (Using T

Re: PGP DLL coming with CKT 6.5.8 build 9 beta 3

Hello Dierk, A reminder of what Dierk Haasis on TBBETA typed on: 22 November 2004 at 22:28:29 GMT +0100 > I can privately e-mail the older, perfectly working file. How does one tell? I'm using 6.5.8 with the dll but I can't tell what version it is. -- Best regards,Tony. _

Re: PGP DLL coming with CKT 6.5.8 build 9 beta 3

Hello Zygmunt! On Monday, November 22, 2004 at 10:42:13 PM you wrote: > With built-in support all attached files are decrypted. So, thus may be > another remedy: use The Bat! internal support, but no DLL. Depends if you wish to use all options and features available in PGP, like the Secure Viewe

Re: PGP DLL coming with CKT 6.5.8 build 9 beta 3

Hello Hendrik! On Monday, November 22, 2004 at 10:39:31 PM you wrote: >> If anybody uses PGP 6.5.8ckt build 09 beta 3 (also shown as beta 2) >> and has its DLL in TB's main directory, I can privately e-mail the >> older, perfectly working file. > I will send the 2 files RAR-ed to your eMai

Re: PGP DLL coming with CKT 6.5.8 build 9 beta 3

On Monday, November 22, 2004, at 22:28:29 [UTC+0100] (Monday, November 22, 2004 22:28 my local time) Dierk Haasis wrote: > Some of you may remember the woes I had some time ago with the PGP > plug-in coming with the last of CKT's PGP builds. As a reminder: > special characters were not treat

Re: PGP DLL coming with CKT 6.5.8 build 9 beta 3

"Dierk Haasis" wrotes on 23/11/2004 at 08:28:29 +1100 subject "PGP DLL coming with CKT 6.5.8 build 9 beta 3" : > If anybody uses PGP 6.5.8ckt build 09 beta 3 (also shown as beta 2) > and has its DLL in TB's main directory, I can privately e-mail the > older, perfectly working file. I have

Re: Re[2]: mail downlaoded but not saved

Lynn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote > > 11/21/2004 > > > D> the log shows the mails as downloaded but they are still on the server > > > some error messages in the log are actually generated by the > server .. I haven't yet figured out any sure-fire way to identify > which is which, but if the log

PGP DLL coming with CKT 6.5.8 build 9 beta 3

Hello TBBETA Members! Some of you may remember the woes I had some time ago with the PGP plug-in coming with the last of CKT's PGP builds. As a reminder: special characters were not treated correctly. With the help of Mary I was able to find another problem with that DLL - messages cont

On-The-Fly encryption category

Hello Tbbeta, I've just created the "On-The-Fly Encryption" category at the bugtracker. Could you please list there the bugs with OTFE which we didn't resolve yet?! -- Best regards, Maxim Masiutin mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ___

Re: test gmail retr

Hæ! Monday, November 22, 2004, 15:06, Stuart Cuddy wrote: > Just wondering why your reply to George contains TBUDL in the To: > header as well as the tbbeta address, when it was originally from > tbbeta. I guess I did to much C&P over the last days... ;) Should be correct now... -- Kveðja, Tho

Re: test gmail retr

Hi George, On 22 Nov 2004 16:03:55 (my local time 15:03:55), George M. Menegakis wrote: GMM> Only bat doesn't like google. Does anybody have an idea or should GMM> I abandon Bat for reading gmail ? I've been having the same problem with gmx, and here is the problem: the addressbooks containing

Re: test gmail retr

Hello George, A reminder of what George M. Menegakis on TBBETA typed on: 22 November 2004 at 16:03:55 GMT +0200 > Only bat doesn't like google. Does anybody have an idea or should I abandon > Bat for reading gmail ? Why? The Bat! is perfect for G-Mail. Your problem, look in your address bo

Re: test gmail retr

Hello George! On Monday, November 22, 2004 at 3:03:55 PM you wrote: > And Bat appears to be the only mail program on my system which has problems > with gmail. Outlook, Outlook Express and Thunderbird make no complains about > the issuer of the certificate. Looks like TB does the right thing ...

Re[2]: test gmail retr

Hello Thorvald, Just wondering why your reply to George contains TBUDL in the To: header as well as the tbbeta address, when it was originally from tbbeta. Again, just wondering as it broke my thread color. :( -- Stuartmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v3.0.2.5

Re: test gmail retr

Hæ! Monday, November 22, 2004, 14:34, George M. Menegakis wrote: > So it appears that I don't have gmail's popper certificate > installed. The question is, where could I find it? I did not install any certificate... -- Kveðja, Thorvald Neumann | | The Bat! v3.0.2.7 Profes

Re: test gmail retr

Hæ! Monday, November 22, 2004, 14:14, George M. Menegakis wrote: > Mail server: pop.gmail.com > Connection: Secure to dedicated port (TLS) port 995 Yes, the same as my settings. My log says: 22.11.2004, 14:30:03: FETCH - Initiating TLS handshake 22.11.2004, 14:30:03: FETCH - Certificate S/N: 3E

Re: test gmail retr

Hæ! Monday, November 22, 2004, 12:45, George M. Menegakis wrote: > By the way, each time I check GMAIL for new email a popup informs me that: It does not appear on my machine. What settings are you using? -- Kveðja, Thorvald Neumann | | The Bat! v3.0.2.7 Professional & K