Hello Clive,
On Mon, 28 Nov 2005 you wrote in
CT> You're right to doubt my intelligence - my wife does it all the time!
:-)
CT> However, as I set out in my previous postings, whatever order number
CT> I put into the "order" box, clicking the fetch button generates a
CT> "this file does not hav
Hello Dirk,
On Mon, 28 Nov 2005 you wrote in
>> Would be better if there were some way for the "replied" icon marker
>> to be placed only when the message is actually sent.
DZ> How to be, when I answered twice to the outbox, but only once send it
DZ> out? Or you forget to send it out - it is
Hi Richard,
> When you insert the number "7" as suggested you then click on the
> Fetch button and that should(!) take you to a page in Opera where
> there is a 104 long number that you can copy and paste into the
> bottom box. This will give you a temporary membership
You're right to doubt my in
Hello Mary,
> Would be better if there were some way for the "replied" icon marker
> to be placed only when the message is actually sent.
How to be, when I answered twice to the outbox, but only once send it
out? Or you forget to send it out - it is all the time in the outbox. Is
it anwered or
Hello Richard!
On Sunday, November 27, 2005, 7:52 PM, you wrote:
> I have just found that, on writing a message and saving it in the
> outbox (either as draft or ready to send) the usual little marker
> shows on the corresponding thread that you have replied to it.
> All ok so far.
> However, d
Hello,
I have just found that, on writing a message and saving it in the outbox
(either as draft or ready to send) the usual little marker shows on the
corresponding thread that you have replied to it.
All ok so far.
However, delete the message from the outbox and the thread still has the
marker
Hello Clive,
On Wed, 23 Nov 2005 you wrote in
CT> I still can't get this prog to work. No matter what combination of order
CT> number or activation key I enter I get the messages I posted a few days
CT> ago here, namely "the file doesn't have an association with it to
CT> perform this action.."
Hello List,
I remembered an issue occurring since 1.x and still present with
actual v3:
In eMails where the last line in source code is not terminated by an
hard paragraph break the two last letters are not displayed.
Please find enclosed an example.
I do not think that it is related to
mid:[EM
On Sunday, November 27, 2005, 2:28:02 PM, Stefan Tanurkov wrote:
> Separation of search history was done for security purposes - i.e.
> when serveral users have their accounts in a single copy of TB!, it
> may undesirable that one user knew about searches of other users.
I don't think the program
Hello MAU,
Separation of search history was done for security purposes - i.e. when serveral
users have their accounts in a single copy of TB!, it may undesirable that
one user knew about searches of other users.
--
Best regards,
Stefanmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Hello Alexander,
>> Using JAWS 5.1
> Claude uses JAWS 6.20. You tested JAWS 5.1. The most recent version is JAWS
> 7.0... I think at first you should sort the version conflict... :-)
I tested now with V7.0. The program pronounces "star, star... "etc at
the logon screen.
I downloaded v6.0, (no 6.
Hello Maxim,
>>>So, I was asked to confirm if the logon screen password is announced
>>>loudly by JAWS. Using JAWS 5.1, at me it says: star, star, star...
>>>etc.
> We are using Windows RichEdit20W control from RICHED20.DLL. Maybe
> JAWS 5.1 doesn't support it?
Maxim: the user COMPLAINS that h
Hello Mary,
On Sun, 27 Nov 2005 you wrote in
MB> So, your theory that "- --" was functioning as a signature delimiter
MB> is correct.
I have sig text set small and ignorable as you do so that's how I knew.
--
Regards,
Richard
| The Bat! 3.63.05 (Beta) with SpamPal & POP3 account and no Plug-
Hello Richard!
On Sunday, November 27, 2005, 12:54 PM, you wrote:
MB>> It's not just you, Richard.
MB>> The text is very hard to read in Krister's messages, and equally
MB>> difficult to manage quoting from.
> Well, something's changed as his next message appears fine here. Just a
> glitch I re
Hello Mary,
On Sun, 27 Nov 2005 you wrote in
MB> It's not just you, Richard.
MB> The text is very hard to read in Krister's messages, and equally
MB> difficult to manage quoting from.
Well, something's changed as his next message appears fine here. Just a
glitch I reckon.
--
Regards,
Richard
Hello Richard!
On Sunday, November 27, 2005, 12:29 PM, you wrote:
KE>> It's been a while, hasn't it.:-)
> Is it just me or does anyone else see all of your text as a quote from
> your last two posts? In fact I just did an F4 with the first two lines
> to demonstrate it they were stripped because
Hello Krister,
On Sun, 27 Nov 2005 you wrote in
KE> Hi Thomas!
KE> On 27 Nov 2005 10:52:34 (my local time 16:40:53), you typed:
TF>> Welcome back! Long time no hear.
KE>
KE> It's been a while, hasn't it.:-)
Is it just me or does anyone else see all of your text as a quote from
your last two
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Maxim!
On 27 Nov 2005 12:56:06 (my local time 18:54:57), you typed:
>>>So, I was asked to confirm if the logon screen password is announced
>>>loudly by JAWS. Using JAWS 5.1, at me it says: star, star, star...
>>>etc.
MM> We are using Windows R
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Thomas!
On 27 Nov 2005 10:52:34 (my local time 16:40:53), you typed:
- --
TF> Welcome back! Long time no hear.
It's been a while, hasn't it.:-)
KE>> A good screen reader shouldn't pronounce the words in a password
KE>> field, after all, the pass
Hello Vili & everyone else,
on 27-Nov-2005 at 13:05 you (Vili) wrote:
> Using JAWS 5.1
Claude uses JAWS 6.20. You tested JAWS 5.1. The most recent version is JAWS
7.0... I think at first you should sort the version conflict... :-)
--
Best regards,
Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de - ICQ 2381
Hello Vili,
Sunday, November 27, 2005, 14:05:15, you wrote:
>>So, I was asked to confirm if the logon screen password is announced
>>loudly by JAWS. Using JAWS 5.1, at me it says: star, star, star...
>>etc.
We are using Windows RichEdit20W control from RICHED20.DLL. Maybe JAWS 5.1
doesn't suppo
Hello Krister,
On Sun, 27 Nov 2005 16:23:16 +0100 GMT (27/11/2005, 22:23 +0700 GMT),
Krister Ekstrom wrote:
Welcome back! Long time no hear.
TF>> Could it be a setting in JAWS itself?
KE> A good screen reader shouldn't pronounce the words in a password
KE> field, after all, the password's meant
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Thomas!
On 27 Nov 2005 08:39:56 (my local time 14:31:44), you typed:
- --
V>> So, I CANNOT confirm that JAWS pronounces the logon password in
V>> Voyager v3.63.05.
TF> Could it be a setting in JAWS itself?
A good screen reader shouldn't pronounc
Bonjour Vili,
Le dimanche 27 novembre 2005 à 15:42:41, vous écriviez :
V> Hello Claude,
V> So, I CANNOT confirm that JAWS pronounces the logon password in
V> Voyager v3.63.05.
>> It is true with Jaws 6.20 US...
V> What do you mean by "true"? Do you hear the password or not?
Yes ...
>>
Hello Claude,
V So, I CANNOT confirm that JAWS pronounces the logon password in
V Voyager v3.63.05.
> It is true with Jaws 6.20 US...
What do you mean by "true"? Do you hear the password or not?
>>> Could it be a setting in JAWS itself?
> No ...
V>> Dont know... :( I just checked it with
Hello Vili,
On Sun, 27 Nov 2005 15:23:02 +0100 GMT (27/11/2005, 21:23 +0700 GMT),
Vili wrote:
V> But... I would guess, it is not possible. Because then anyone could crack
V> the passwords using JAWS...
This is getting OT, but there is free software around doing just that.
IIRC JAWS costs two or
Hello Dean!
On Sunday, November 27, 2005, 8:38 AM, you wrote:
> I had it set so the mail would appear read after 5 seconds in
> auto-view. Can't get the setting to stick. Went back to the 14
> version and it works fine.
Please check out BT issue report
http://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=5
Bonjour Vili,
Le dimanche 27 novembre 2005 à 15:23:02, vous écriviez :
V> Hello Thomas,
V>>> So, I CANNOT confirm that JAWS pronounces the logon password in
V>>> Voyager v3.63.05.
It is true with Jaws 6.20 US...
>> Could it be a setting in JAWS itself?
No ...
V> Dont know... :( I just check
Hello Thomas,
V>> So, I CANNOT confirm that JAWS pronounces the logon password in
V>> Voyager v3.63.05.
> Could it be a setting in JAWS itself?
Dont know... :( I just checked it with the default settings, we wait
for the JAWS experts to answer it :)
But... I would guess, it is not possible. Beca
Hello Vili,
On Sun, 27 Nov 2005 13:05:15 +0100 GMT (27/11/2005, 19:05 +0700 GMT),
Vili wrote:
V> So, I CANNOT confirm that JAWS pronounces the logon password in
V> Voyager v3.63.05.
Could it be a setting in JAWS itself?
--
Cheers,
Thomas.
Every day, the hummingbird eats its own weight in foo
Hello MAU,
On Sun, 27 Nov 2005 11:48:39 +0100 GMT (27/11/2005, 17:48 +0700 GMT),
MAU wrote:
M> Also, history does not 'remember' the folders you did the search on.
Whenever I open the search, default is the folder that I am in. I like
that.
M> This is why for some searches I repeat more or less
Hello MAU,
> Since I really think it is a different and separate issue, I have opened
> a new BT report at https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=5392
Not being able to use VFs reliably even with a manual Refresh is really
a show stopper for me. So, I definitely abandon any further testing of
3.6
Hello List,
I have received today the regular verification email from the PGP
keyserver. It is PGP signed.
I am using PGP-8.1
Clicking on the verification button above the eMail transforms it to
green. I interpret this as "good sig".
Unlike as with PGP/MIME, there is no windows with details abo
Hello all,
(I did not find the thread, I started a new one.)
So, I was asked to confirm if the logon screen password is announced
loudly by JAWS. Using JAWS 5.1, at me it says: star, star, star...
etc.
So, I CANNOT confirm that JAWS pronounces the logon password in
Voyager v3.63.05.
--
Vili
T
Hello Vili,
> Good point! We were talking about this in the past. MAU: as the origin
> of the wish, would you add it to the wish?
>
> (Also, I would not mind if I could access the last searches from a
> drop-down list, not from menu...)
Be my guest. Feel free to add the note yourself :)
--
Best
Hello Thomas,
> With all the hype about the search being so fast now (I'm looking
> forward to upgrading ASN), I wonder whether it's possible to bring one
> old functionality back to the search cetner: Remembering the
> preferrences where to search. Most of the time I search in "Headers",
> and I
Hello Thomas,
M>> The only way to tell is by comparing oranges to oranges. I have just
M>> repeated with 3.62.14 the search I mention and it takes 2 min. and 50
M>> seconds vs. the 1 min and 34 secs with 3.63.05.
> With all the hype about the search being so fast now (I'm looking
> forward to upgr
37 matches
Mail list logo
