Re: Smiles bug

2006-01-07 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Den, On Sat, 7 Jan 2006 00:38:52 +0400GMT (6-1-2006, 21:38 +0100, where I live), you wrote: MM>> The Bat v3.64.03 BETA is available at MM>> http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files/the_bat/beta/tbb36403.rar DVY> no smiles. only "error picture" (smiles.png). DVY> on 3.64.01 all ok (smiles_ok.p

Still Curious about DDHELP.exe

2006-01-07 Thread Robert D.
This still bugs me. Everytime I start The Bat!, the MS program ddhelp.exe starts. When TB! ends, it leaves the ddhelp running. Here is a screenshot of the process, seen clearly as started by TB! www.denstarfarm.us/Public/DDHELP.jpg Any WinME users on the lists ?? Maybe this is only a WinME proble

Re: Voyager 3.64.02

2006-01-07 Thread Krzysztof Kudlacik
I cannot run Voyager ... first, after submiting password, I get this: > AppName: voyager.exe > AppVer: 3.64.1.0 > ModName: kernel32.dll > ModVer: 5.1.2600.2180 > Offset: 0001eb33 and on this Windows monit I click 'close' and next I get two next errors - see screenshots. This end, Voyager can't

SPF and domain key signatures

2006-01-07 Thread Szabolcs Péter
Hello fellow members and RIT Labs,I'd like to inquire if there are any plans to support SPF (Sender Policy Framework) or DomainKeys in The Bat? Or is there a 3rd party plugin that supports these technologies?Yahoo, Gmail etc. already signs messages with domain key signatures, SPF entries are becom

Re: SPF and domain key signatures

2006-01-07 Thread Gary
Hi Szabolcs, --On Saturday, January 07, 2006 6:29 PM +0100 you wrote in part: I'd like to inquire if there are any plans to support SPF (Sender Policy Framework) or DomainKeys in The Bat? Or is there a 3rd party plugin that supports these technologies? the only thing an email client can do is

Re: Still Curious about DDHELP.exe

2006-01-07 Thread Stefan Riegler
Hello List! Hi Robert D., on 07.01.2006 at 13:58 [UTC -0500] you wrote: > Here is a screenshot of the process, seen clearly as started by TB! I have an idea.. Try to track down when exactly ddhelp.exe is started, and how it affects TB if you are preventing the start of ddhelp.exe. Use Process G

Re: Bug 4933 still a major headache

2006-01-07 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Marck! On Thursday, January 05, 2006, 2:44 PM, you wrote: > https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4933 > This issue has been a complete PITA for me since it started playing > up. It goes under the caption "Big problem with To field in QTs". > The bug is nasty because there's not even a w

Re: Bug 4933 still a major headache

2006-01-07 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Mary! On Saturday, January 07, 2006, 4:58 PM, you wrote: >> https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4933 >> This issue has been a complete PITA for me since it started playing >> up. It goes under the caption "Big problem with To field in QTs". Is the BT Issue Report "'Create a formatted

Re: Still Curious about DDHELP.exe

2006-01-07 Thread Robert D.
Recently, Stefan Riegler squawked: > Use Process Guard from http://www.diamondcs.com.au/processguard/ > In the meanwhile I'm installing a copy of Me... Great ... note though that the program web site does not mention Windows Millennium ... NTL I am D/L'ing it right now to try in case it DOES wor

Re: Bug 4933 still a major headache

2006-01-07 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Dear Mary, @7-Jan-2006, 16:58 -0600 (07-Jan 22:58 here) Mary Bull [MRB] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck: >> https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4933 >> This issue has been a complete PITA for me since it started playing >> up. It goes under the caption "Big problem with To field in QTs

Re: Bug 4933 still a major headache

2006-01-07 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Dear Mary, @7-Jan-2006, 17:30 -0600 (07-Jan 23:30 here) Mary Bull [MRB] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Mary: >>> This issue has been a complete PITA for me since it started playing >>> up. It goes under the caption "Big problem with To field in QTs". MRB> Is the BT Issue Report "'Create a form

Re: Still Curious about DDHELP.exe

2006-01-07 Thread Robert D.
Recently, Stefan Riegler squawked: > Use Process Guard from http://www.diamondcs.com.au/processguard/ confirmed ... popup at attempted install informing me that it must be run on an NT . an I have WinME other ideas? -- Regards, Robert D. :flag-us-ky: _ The Bat! Ver

Re: Bug 4933 still a major headache

2006-01-07 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Marck! On Saturday, January 07, 2006, 5:32 PM, you wrote: >>> https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4933 < ... > MRB>> Then Miguel suggested in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] MRB>> "What about %SetHeader('To','[EMAIL PROTECTED]')? It is working for me." MRB>> And you reported that you'd tried i

Re: Bug 4933 still a major headache

2006-01-07 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Marck! On Saturday, January 07, 2006, 5:35 PM, you wrote: This issue has been a complete PITA for me since it started playing up. It goes under the caption "Big problem with To field in QTs". MRB>> Is the BT Issue Report "'Create a formatted message filter action' is MRB>> broken

Re: Still Curious about DDHELP.exe

2006-01-07 Thread Stefan Riegler
Hello List! Hi Robert D., on 07.01.2006 at 13:58 [UTC -0500] you wrote: > Any WinME users on the lists ?? Maybe this is only a WinME problem? Clean install of WinME, clean install of TB Pro... No sign of Direct Draw Helper... Although the file exists, but is not started with TB. Maybe it is sta

Re: Still Curious about DDHELP.exe

2006-01-07 Thread Paul Van Noord
1/7/2006 5:47 PM Hi Robert, On 1/7/2006 Robert D. wrote: RD> This still bugs me. Everytime I start The Bat!, the MS program RD> ddhelp.exe starts. When TB! ends, it leaves the ddhelp running. RD> Here is a screenshot of the process, seen clearly as started by TB! RD> www.denstarfarm.us/Public/

Re: Still Curious about DDHELP.exe

2006-01-07 Thread Stefan Riegler
Hello List! Hi Robert D., on 08.01.2006 at 00:43 [UTC -0500] you wrote: > confirmed ... popup at attempted install informing me that it must be > run on an NT . an I have WinME Damned... As I wrote the mail, I had thought about this and the way PG works, but only split second, I was so busy

Re[2]: Bug 4933 still a major headache

2006-01-07 Thread Paul Van Noord
1/7/2006 8:55 PM Hi Mary, On 1/7/2006 Mary Bull wrote: MB> A friend has lost all the carefully customized nested QTs by upgrading MB> to v. 3.64.03 from the Christmas Edition 3.64.01. MB> Dropping back from the new beta still left all the customized, nested MB> QTs missing. MB> NB to Stefan