Hi All,
Can anyone please tell me the outcome of the recent debate about
having a separate 'Drafts' folder. I cannot find anything in the
Bugtraq archive.
TIA
--
Best regards,
Roger
Flying with The Bat!, version 3.70.06 "Qigong" (Beta), with antispam BayesIt!
0.8.4,
on Windows
Hello Curtis & everyone else,
on 12-Feb-2006 at 22:14 you (Curtis) wrote:
>> I browsed the messages that I received from the BT, no sign of something
>> alike... I filed a new report now, please add your comments here:
> I just did. Thanks for taking the time to look and make the report. Been
>
On 12/2/2006 at 4:22:54 AM [GMT -0500], Alexander S. Kunz wrote:
> I browsed the messages that I received from the BT, no sign of something
> alike... I filed a new report now, please add your comments here:
I just did. Thanks for taking the time to look and make the report. Been
having a hectic
Hallo Ian,
On Mon, 13 Feb 2006 07:21:12 +1100GMT (12-2-2006, 21:21 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:
IAW> Futher to the last post, picking the link has nothing to do with the
IAW> looping AV. If the message preview has any links in it, then as soon
IAW> as you tab into the message preview or pick
Hi Charlene Ferrara,
Sunday, February 12, 2006
you let us know -possibly edited- :
> Hello all,
> I received a message that got filtered, the same moment I hit "unread"
> tab and got:
It happened again, after the AV I got the request to send a problem report
because of "Offset 005a3efc"
TB cras
Hello all,
I received a message that got filtered, the same moment I hit "unread"
tab and got:
---
The Bat!
---
Access violation at address 009A5E91 in module 'thebat.exe'. Read of address
004C.
---
OK
Hello Curtis & everyone else,
on 12-Feb-2006 at 01:24 you (Curtis) wrote:
>> I think I/we/whoever :) forgot to report it in the bugtracker maybe? I
>> prepared some screenshots & could file the report if so... please let me
>> know.
> I can't check now, but I could've sworn that I had reported t
7 matches
Mail list logo
