miércoles, 5 abr 2006 at 17:09, it seems you wrote:
> Is there a 64bit version of Delphi available?
I think there it's not a 64bit version of Delphi. And now Borland is
trying to sell all his IDEs :-(
http://bdn.borland.com/article/0,1410,33439,00.html
--
/\/ Using Th
On Wednesday, April 5, 2006, 22:45:39, Cees wrote:
> I never assumed that it should be easy merely that my hardware is
> 64-bits for 2,5 years now, and that I'm dying to get a proper support,
> finally! Blimey I'm almost due for a major upgrade, something NEW and this
> last
Het was op woensdag 5 april 2006 om 22:52 uur dat jij iets schreef over
'64-bit' :
Hoi Alexander,
.NET
ASK>>> Define .NET :-)
>> .NOT
ASK> I meant that it consists of a whole lot of things... not all of it is
ASK> bad.
I don't have all the information to make such a statement. BUT
Hello Cees & everyone else,
on 05-Apr-2006 at 22:34 you (Cees) wrote:
>>> .NET
ASK>> Define .NET :-)
> .NOT
I meant that it consists of a whole lot of things... not all of it is
bad.
--
Best regards,
Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de - ICQ 238153981)
Fantasy is revealing; it is a method o
Het was op woensdag 5 april 2006 om 18:13 uur dat jij iets schreef over
'64-bit' :
Hoi Jernej,
>> now that's a great question.
>> There should be... 64-bit hardware is around for at least 2,5 years.
>> That's how long I have mine.
JS> Windows XP/2003 for x86_64 has been available f
Het was op woensdag 5 april 2006 om 22:26 uur dat jij iets schreef over
'64-bit' :
Hoi Alexander,
>> .NET
ASK> Define .NET :-)
.NOT
--
groeten,
Cees
Paramedics can revive anything.
__
The Bat! 3.72.0
Hello Jernej Simončič & everyone else,
on 05-Apr-2006 at 21:00 you (Jernej Simončič) wrote:
> .NET
Define .NET :-)
--
Best regards,
Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de - ICQ 238153981)
[Crash programs] fail because they are all based on the theory that,
with nine women pregnant, you can get a
4/5/2006 4:08 PM
Hi Jernej,
On 4/5/2006 Jernej Simončič wrote:
>> Besides, I think RIT Labs has now migrated to C++. So if it
>> were me, I'd be thinking C# and .NET 2.0 Framework. The Team version
>> of Visual Studio 2005 has a 64-bit compiler and that's the only
>> windows one I'm aware of.
MAU wrote:
M> I think you should open a BT report.
Done:
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=5795
If anyone else has noticed this, or feels like messing with it (I
added detailed steps to reproduce in the BT report), confirmations
would be much appreciated.
--
George
Using The Bat! 3.72.0
On Wednesday, April 5, 2006 @ 11:54:09 AM [-0700], Neal Laugman wrote:
> Wondering if any Batters have loaded TB on x64?
I had it running for about 3 months with no issues. I switched back to
32 bit because of other software I frequently used that did not have 64
bit support.
--
Matt
Using 3.7
On Wednesday, April 5, 2006, 20:54:09, Neal Laugman wrote:
> Besides, I think RIT Labs has now migrated to C++. So if it
> were me, I'd be thinking C# and .NET 2.0 Framework. The Team version
> of Visual Studio 2005 has a 64-bit compiler and that's the only
> windows one I'm aware of.
If TB moves
Hello Cees,
OT:
Wednesday, April 5, 2006, 7:25:53 AM, you wrote:
JS>> Is there a 64bit version of Delphi available?
> now that's a great question.
> There should be... 64-bit hardware is around for at least 2,5 years.
> That's how long I have mine.
Probably how long we will have to
On Wednesday, April 5, 2006, 17:25:53, Cees wrote:
> now that's a great question.
> There should be... 64-bit hardware is around for at least 2,5 years.
> That's how long I have mine.
Windows XP/2003 for x86_64 has been available for less than a year (not
counting betas), and porting a
Hello,
my name is Stefan from munich (germany), this is my first posting in
this mailing list.
I use The Bat! version 3.72.05 (Beta)
(Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2)
When i open an email attachment i get always the error message
regexp is wrong: regular expression too long.
A downgr
Hello George,
> Anyone else use this option, and if so can you confirm this behavior?
> Or should I just open a BT item?
I have seen other filter related issues in the last beta, for example
this one: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=5793
I think you should open a BT report.
--
Best rega
Het was op woensdag 5 april 2006 om 17:09 uur dat jij iets schreef over
'64-bit' :
Hoi Jernej,
>> I'm curious if this behaviour can improve in a true 64-bit email
>> application.
JS> Is there a 64bit version of Delphi available?
now that's a great question.
There should be
On Wednesday, April 5, 2006, 14:36:24, Cees wrote:
> I'm curious if this behaviour can improve in a true 64-bit email
> application.
Is there a 64bit version of Delphi available?
--
< Jernej Simončič ><><><><>< http://deepthought.ena.si/ >
[The Bat! v3.72.05 (Beta) on Windows 20
Hello Curtis,
Wednesday, April 5, 2006, 7:27:50 AM, you wrote:
C> Two things are a relative problem here:
C> - it would seem that TB! has a problem recovering by itself from such
C> a disconnected state. For example, this morning I manually reconnected
C> just fine. However, although TB! is set t
Het is nu woensdag 5 april 2006, 14:34:33 h :
Hoi tbbeta,
I would love to see a 64-bit compiled version of TheBat! to see if
filehandling can improve! If I send attachments of over 5mb through 35Mb
it takes TheBat! forever to handle that and give me the window to type in
my
Hi all,
Take the following scenario:
I leave TB! running at one site. It loses the connection to the server
because of network issues.
At another site, I run TB! and manage mail. I delete, read etc.
I return to the original site, see that TB! is no longer connected.
Based on the state of the fo
Hello Cees,
Monday, April 3, 2006, 10:35:17 AM, among other things, you wrote:
C> Het was op maandag 3 april 2006 om 10:01 uur dat jij iets schreef over
'shortcut definement' :
C> Hoi Feli,
C>>> as I stated earlier I (thought I) managed to attach a shortcut
C>>> keycombination
21 matches
Mail list logo
