Hi Miroslav,
on Wed, 13 Sep 2006 17:04:08 +0200GMT (13.09.2006, 17:04 +0200GMT here),
Miroslav Florensen wrote:
MF> http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files/the_bat/voyager_install-3-85-03.exe
Hey, thanks for finding it.
MF> Voyager writes further registry entries ...
MF> http://thebat.zetema.de/
Hello Richard!
On Wednesday, September 13, 2006, 11:48 AM, you wrote:
MB>> I've taken the liberty of amending the thread subject line above.
> Well done, I should have done that to let people know that I'd posted
> the wish.
I seldom remember to do it myself.
But, since I was in OT conversatio
Hello Mary,
On Wed, 13 Sep 2006 you wrote in
MB> I've taken the liberty of amending the thread subject line above.
Well done, I should have done that to let people know that I'd posted
the wish.
--
Regards,
Richard
| The Bat! 3.85.03 with POP3 account & AntispamSniper 1.6.5
| Windows XP (bui
Hello Richard!
On Wednesday, September 13, 2006, 10:56 AM, you wrote:
MB>> Maybe a more general complaint about *all* unresizeable dialogue boxes
MB>> would be in order.
> Done https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=6032
Support note added.
Thanks a mil, Richard!
(I've taken the liberty of am
Hello Raymund,
On Wed, 13 Sep 2006 you wrote in
RT> The other idea would have been to move the Unwanted filter a bit down
RT> in the list. Probably after all filters that filter for a known
RT> address.
Good idea. Actually easier to move some specific filters above the
unwanted I think. ..J
Hi Richard!
> I've now removed a lot of those words as they can be taken up by
> AntispamSniper BadWords filter and, as her address is white listed,
> the words used in her mail won't affect her white listed status.
The other idea would have been to move the Unwanted filter a bit down
in the list
Hello Mary,
On Tue, 12 Sep 2006 you wrote in
MB> Maybe a more general complaint about *all* unresizeable dialogue boxes
MB> would be in order.
Done https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=6032
--
Regards,
Richard
| The Bat! 3.85.03 with POP3 account & AntispamSniper 1.6.5
| Windows XP (build
Hello Miguel!
On Wednesday, September 13, 2006, 9:48 AM, you wrote:
> I someone aside of you confirms this behaviour (i.e. no FILTER lines in
> log if Verbose is on) I'll log a bug report in BT.
I put Verbose on specifically to test for this.
Confirmed. No filter lines. My accounts are all POP3
Hello Thomas!
On Wednesday, September 13, 2006, 9:03 AM, you wrote:
MB No doubt I am truly the dizzy dame which my good friend Thomas
MB Fernandez regards me as.
>>> ;-)
MB>> "There is nothing like a dame," right?
> You mean like Dame Edna?
> http://www.dame-edna.com/
Ah, she does st
On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 08:00:20PM +0700 or thereabouts, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
Hi Thomas,
> On Tue, 12 Sep 2006 16:52:48 -0500 GMT (13/09/2006, 04:52 +0700 GMT),
> Gary wrote:
>
> G> The protocol as you call it, (SSL, TLS) does not define that the certs have
> G> to be valid, never has. It i
Hello Martin,
http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files/the_bat/voyager_install-3-85-03.exe
Voyager writes further registry entries ...
http://thebat.zetema.de/download_voyager.html
--
Best regards
Miroslav
BAT-MAIL.DE.VU - http://bat-mail.de.vu
_
Hello MAU,
On Wed, 13 Sep 2006 you wrote in
M> I someone aside of you confirms this behaviour (i.e. no FILTER lines in
M> log if Verbose is on) I'll log a bug report in BT.
And I'll support it. I was always led to believe that "verbose" setting
was exactly that, you got everything :-)
--
Rega
Hello Richard,
M>> I still don't understand why you don't get any FILTER lines in your log.
>
> I've never seen them there and I have the verbose log setting too.
Verbose setting, that's the culprit.
I have been doing some testing and if I set verbose log I get:
1.- Two FETCH lines per message
Hello Mary,
On Wed, 13 Sep 2006 08:34:10 -0500 GMT (13/09/2006, 20:34 +0700 GMT),
Mary Bull wrote:
MB>>> No doubt I am truly the dizzy dame which my good friend Thomas
MB>>> Fernandez regards me as.
>> ;-)
MB> "There is nothing like a dame," right?
You mean like Dame Edna?
http://www.dame-edn
Hello Thomas!
On Wednesday, September 13, 2006, 8:16 AM, you wrote:
MB>> No doubt I am truly the dizzy dame which my good friend Thomas
MB>> Fernandez regards me as.
> ;-)
"There is nothing like a dame," right?
MB>> I didn't pay attention to what it said. Hit download, closed TB! after
MB>> th
Hello Mary,
On Mon, 11 Sep 2006 14:11:34 -0500 GMT (12/09/2006, 02:11 +0700 GMT),
Mary Bull wrote:
MB> No doubt I am truly the dizzy dame which my good friend Thomas
MB> Fernandez regards me as.
;-)
MB> I didn't pay attention to what it said. Hit download, closed TB! after
MB> the transfer conc
Hello Peter,
On Mon, 11 Sep 2006 20:47:46 +0200 GMT (12/09/2006, 01:47 +0700 GMT),
Peter Meyns wrote:
PM> Not quite cosmetic, I'd say. If the user wants to be automatically
PM> informed about updates, there shouldn't be an alert when s/he uses the
PM> latest version.
Fair enough.
--
Cheers,
T
Hello Gary,
On Tue, 12 Sep 2006 16:52:48 -0500 GMT (13/09/2006, 04:52 +0700 GMT),
Gary wrote:
G> The protocol as you call it, (SSL, TLS) does not define that the certs have
G> to be valid, never has. It is the client, TB!, that has decided for me not
G> to accept it. It should be always up to th
18 matches
Mail list logo
