Re[2]: Initial Error Message on Retrieving Mail

2006-12-07 Thread Bob Riley
Hi All, Thursday, December 7, 2006, 3:05:58 AM, Roelof wrote: > Hallo Bob, > On Wed, 6 Dec 2006 19:11:12 -0700GMT (7-12-2006, 3:11 , where I live), > you wrote: BR>> With TB 3.86.08, the persistent failure of the first attempt to BR>> retrieve mail yields this message: > Can't confirm. Are you

Re: Version 3.86.8 ALPHA (Beta): Mass mailing and attachments problem

2006-12-07 Thread Costas Papadopoulos
Hello Marek, Thursday, December 7, 2006, 11:52:27 PM, you wrote (possibly edited): > it is a known problem of this betaserie when attachment is defined > in massmailing template. Thank you for the information. I didn't know about it. -- Best regards, Costas

Re: Version 3.86.8 ALPHA (Beta): Mass mailing and attachments problem

2006-12-07 Thread Marek Mikus
Hello all, Thursday, December 7, 2006, Costas Papadopoulos wrote: > Here's a problem that comes up when I try and send an attachment using > mass mailing to a group of people that I have in my Addressbook. it is a known problem of this betaserie when attachment is defined in massmailing template.

Version 3.86.8 ALPHA (Beta): Mass mailing and attachments problem

2006-12-07 Thread Costas Papadopoulos
Hello, Here's a problem that comes up when I try and send an attachment using mass mailing to a group of people that I have in my Addressbook. --- Address Book --- Could not create a message for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Please check your free di

Re: Memory Usage in Official Release - Mapi32 failure in Beta

2006-12-07 Thread Jernej Simončič
On Thursday, December 7, 2006, 16:42:01, Barry wrote: > Interesting? Today at initial start was using 35 000 about 15 seconds after > checking all the accounts (2 POP & 2 IMAP) then dropped to 7 000 after > closing the connection centre. I then minimised TB! and it immediately > dropped to 2 000

Re: Memory Usage in Official Release - Mapi32 failure in Beta

2006-12-07 Thread Barry
On Thu, 7 Dec 2006 06:47:00 -0500, Ethan J. Mings wrote: > I went into the set up program, removed the multi-language interface > option as well as the spam program. That appears to cut down the memory > usage to half. > However, it is still using a fair amount of memory, 35 000 and only drops

Re[3]: %cookie problem with national characters - back in 3.86.07

2006-12-07 Thread Victor Star
Hi Konstantin, VS>> This was fixed in 3.86.05 and 3.86.06 but is back in 3.86.07. > Cannnot confirm neither with 3.86.08 nor with .08. > Tried new message and replay with both koi8 and 1251 encodings. Cookies are > in 1251. All's fine. > Check Control Panel -> Regional and Language Options -> Ad

Re[2]: %cookie problem with national characters - back in 3.86.07

2006-12-07 Thread Konstantin Zhilenko
Hello, Victor, Wednesday, November 22, 2006, you wrote: >> I've just upgraded The Bat! from (much) earlier 3.XX version to 3.85.03. >> Now I'm getting this strange problem with %Cookie macro in the template. >> This problem is still there for me in the latest beta (3.86.04). >> I have a text file

Re[2]: Memory Usage in Official Release - Mapi32 failure in Beta

2006-12-07 Thread Ethan J. Mings
Hello Feli, Wednesday, December 6, 2006, 11:30:36 AM, you wrote: FW> this is an official beta, only it's name is ALPHA. FW> Ritlab's kind of joke. Thanks for that. I completely missed the joke :-) I'll try it again. -- Ethan J. Mings

Re[2]: Memory Usage in Official Release - Mapi32 failure in Beta

2006-12-07 Thread Ethan J. Mings
Hello Barry, Wednesday, December 6, 2006, 6:08:14 AM, you wrote: B> Hmmm, not for me it doesn't, uses around 7,000 and drops to 2,000 when B> minimized to tray. B> Currently 4 separate accounts and around 10,000 messages in total. Interesting I went into the set up program, removed the mu

Re: Initial Error Message on Retrieving Mail

2006-12-07 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Bob, On Wed, 6 Dec 2006 19:11:12 -0700GMT (7-12-2006, 3:11 , where I live), you wrote: BR> With TB 3.86.08, the persistent failure of the first attempt to BR> retrieve mail yields this message: Can't confirm. Are you're other accounts troubled with this too or could it be that it's a TLS r