Re: Address book & groups

2006-12-25 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Dear Rick, @25-Dec-2006, 09:43 -0500 (25-Dec 14:43 here) Rick Grunwald [RG] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck: ... RG> %TO="tbbeta@thebat.dutaint.com" ... RG> What is it you find offending? That line! It's a killer. When you reply, the TO address is already filled in. That macro line adds

Re: 3.95.5: sorting office doesn't filter on header if body contains charset directive

2006-12-25 Thread MAU
Hello WL, > I have a filter to look for some custom headers (X-blah > type stuff). > > If the body of a multi-part email contains a charset > directive like > > Content-Type: text/html; > charset="ks_c_5601-1987" > > the filter doesn't fire. Now that you say it, yes, I have seen this w

3.95.5: sorting office doesn't filter on header if body contains charset directive

2006-12-25 Thread WL
Hello, all. I'm not sure what the proper behavior for this is, and I'm using a beta (3.95.5), so beta list it goes. This may be something that happens in the previous release versions, and I'm just noticing it now. I have a filter to look for some custom headers (X-blah type stuff). If the body

Re: Address book & groups

2006-12-25 Thread Alexander S. Kunz
Hello Rick Grunwald & everyone else, on 25-Dez-2006 at 20:16 you (Rick Grunwald) wrote: > Fair enough - I used that macro for new messages If you have an address book entry for the list, you don't need to set the TO header additionally. TB will do that anyway when you write a new message to the

bayesit.msi

2006-12-25 Thread Maxim Masiutin
Hello Tbbeta, If you are using BayesIt filter plugin, please install http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/bayesit/bayesit.msi BayesIt will be removed from The Bat! Home and Professional MSI. This means that when you will install a new MSI of The Bat!, it will remove BayesIt. To keep Baye

Re: Address book & groups

2006-12-25 Thread Rick Grunwald
Hello Alexander On Monday, December 25, 2006 you wrote: > Macros that work with address headers have always worked like that. They > do not overwrite the existing contents of the header, but append to it. > It is always the safest to first clear the existing header (e. g. with > %TO="" as Roelof e

Re: Address book & groups

2006-12-25 Thread Alexander S. Kunz
Hello Rick Grunwald & everyone else, on 25-Dez-2006 at 18:28 you (Rick Grunwald) wrote: > I am fairly new to The Bat. I think I see what was happening but not > sure. Creating a new message seemed to work fine. Did something change > with the way the macro works? Macros that work with address he

Re: Address book & groups

2006-12-25 Thread Rick Grunwald
On Monday, December 25, 2006 you wrote: > RG>> %TO="tbbeta@thebat.dutaint.com" > That's the culprit. You're using an AB template, that AB template gets > triggered as soon as the recipient matches the AB entry. > The %To= macro adds an address to the To: header, (it doesn't replace > the conte

Re: Address book & groups

2006-12-25 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Rick, On Mon, 25 Dec 2006 09:43:45 -0500GMT (25-12-2006, 15:43 , where I live), you wrote: RG> the address book templates for this group is as follows RG> %TO="tbbeta@thebat.dutaint.com" That's the culprit. You're using an AB template, that AB template gets triggered as soon as the recipi

Re[2]: Address book & groups

2006-12-25 Thread Paul Van Noord
12/25/2006 9:49 AM Hi Rick, On 12/25/2006 Rick Grunwald wrote: >> My guess is a poorly written folder template. Folder templates are RG> In the filder temlates it has the default %NLANK the address book RG> templates for this group is as follows (This is the reply the new RG> message of course

Re[5]: TB! 3.95.1 and Voyager 3.86.03 don't work under Win98SE

2006-12-25 Thread Paul Van Noord
12/25/2006 9:50 AM Hi Maxim, On 12/23/2006 Maxim Masiutin wrote: MM> Hello Paul, MM> Saturday, December 23, 2006, 20:00:50, you wrote: >>>Sorry Max, not here. Focus stays with main window, etc. Earlier >>>versions are OK. MM> Which of the earlier versions are OK? What about 3.95.04? Sorry fo

Re: Subversive Organization

2006-12-25 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Bob, On Sun, 24 Dec 2006 17:27:07 -0700GMT (25-12-2006, 1:27 , where I live), you wrote: BR> I have it on good authority that at least one member of this mailing BR> list belongs to this rapidly growing subversive organization: Shocking. However I must ask anybody who wants to react to s

Re: Subversive Organization

2006-12-25 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Bob, On Sun, 24 Dec 2006 17:27:07 -0700 GMT (25/12/2006, 07:27 +0700 GMT), Bob Riley wrote: BR> I have it on good authority that at least one member of this mailing BR> list belongs to this rapidly growing subversive organization: Replied to on TBOT. -- Cheers, Thomas. Woran erkennen S

Re: Address book & groups

2006-12-25 Thread Rick Grunwald
Hello Marck On Monday, December 25, 2006 you wrote: > Dear Ben, > @25-Dec-2006, 10:12 Benedict Allen [BA] in > mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Rick: > ... RG>>> One thing: If I COPY/PASTE to a group it is successful. If I drag that RG>>> entry BACK to the address book it does not make 2 entries

Re: Address book & groups

2006-12-25 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Dear Ben, @25-Dec-2006, 10:12 Benedict Allen [BA] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Rick: ... RG>> One thing: If I COPY/PASTE to a group it is successful. If I drag that RG>> entry BACK to the address book it does not make 2 entries which it RG>> should do if it were really a copy BA> I don't m

Re: Address book & groups

2006-12-25 Thread Benedict Allen
Howdy Rick, Sunday, December 24, 2006, 11:16:05 PM, Rick wrotened: >> I guess your group has the property 'hide items if not explicitly >> selected' set. TB never copied entries in AB-groups, but merely added >> the group to the entry. >> The 'hide items..' bit is an unfortunate default setting f