Re: TB! freezes if "RAS Dial Entry" contains an invalid entry

2007-01-02 Thread Benedict Allen
Howdy Goncalo, Monday, January 1, 2007, 7:54:46 PM, Goncalo wrotened: GF> In reply to : HO>>> To make TB! freezing, I have to follow this steps: TF>> I cannot reproduce, because I cannot select (for testing purposes) a TF>> DUN connection that doesn't exist any more. Sorry. GF> Create one and

Re: TB! freezes if "RAS Dial Entry" contains an invalid entry

2007-01-02 Thread Benedict Allen
Howdy Goncalo, Monday, January 1, 2007, 7:54:46 PM, Goncalo wrotened: GF> In reply to : HO>>> To make TB! freezing, I have to follow this steps: TF>> I cannot reproduce, because I cannot select (for testing purposes) a TF>> DUN connection that doesn't exist any more. Sorry. GF> Create one and

Re: TB! freezes if "RAS Dial Entry" contains an invalid entry

2007-01-02 Thread Benedict Allen
Howdy Hendrik, Monday, January 1, 2007, 9:34:20 PM, Hendrik wrotened: HO> "Thomas Fernandez" wrote on 02/01/2007 at 02:52:20 +1100 HO> subject "TB! freezes if "RAS Dial Entry" contains an invalid entry" : >> Hello Hendrik, >> On Mon, 1 Jan 2007 08:12:44 +1100 GMT (01/01/2007, 04:12 +0700 GMT),

Re: Problem with antivirus checking of attachments

2007-01-02 Thread Costas Papadopoulos
Hello, Monday, January 1, 2007, 11:56:07 PM, you wrote (possibly edited): > The problem it's on the plugin. I get the same error when I'm scanning > a lot of messages. In the last few days I've testing the system without the plugin installed. I don't know exactly what the plugin does,

Re: Problem with antivirus checking of attachments

2007-01-02 Thread MAU
Hello Costas, >> The problem it's on the plugin. I get the same error when I'm scanning >> a lot of messages. > > In the last few days I've testing the system without the plugin > installed. I don't know exactly what the plugin does, but nod32 did > catch a virus (executable file attac

Voyager 3.95.06

2007-01-02 Thread Paul Van Noord
1/2/2007 12:04 PM Voyager 3.95.06 Hi Max, I have been using this version of Voyager for several days and I want to thank you for an excellent release. It is very stable and performance is very good. I have not yet found anything that does not function flawlessly and quickly. Thank You Very Much

Re: Voyager 3.95.06

2007-01-02 Thread Nick Danger
Reply to message sent 01/02/2007, @ 12:07:33 (11:07 AM Locally) ~~~ > I have not yet found anything that does not > function flawlessly and quickly. Am I the only one that has the Options|Preferences menu acting wacky with everything bel

Re[2]: Voyager 3.95.06

2007-01-02 Thread Paul Van Noord
1/2/2007 12:35 PM Hi Nick, On 1/2/2007 Nick Danger wrote: ND> Am I the only one that has the Options|Preferences menu acting wacky ND> with everything below "Other options" are out of whack? ND> It's been this way with this and the release previous to this for me. ND> But fine with any version

Re: Problem with antivirus checking of attachments

2007-01-02 Thread Costas Papadopoulos
Hello, Tuesday, January 2, 2007, 6:34:59 PM, you wrote (possibly edited): > If you have NOD32 installed and the IMON module activated and > configures, you do not need the plugin at all. Thank you for the information. I'll abandon the plugin. -- Best regards, Costas _

Re: Voyager 3.95.06

2007-01-02 Thread Nick Danger
Reply to message sent 01/02/2007, @ 20:34:50 (1:34 PM Locally) ~~~ Hello Peter, > Confirmed, the Updates entry appears to be missing from the tree on > the left side. I wonder if it's an XP thing then since Paul doesn't see this problem

Re[2]: Voyager 3.95.06

2007-01-02 Thread Paul Van Noord
1/2/2007 2:51 PM Hi Peter, On 1/2/2007 Peter Ouwehand wrote: PO> Hello Nick Danger, PO> on Tue, 2 Jan 2007 11:27:02 -0600 (2007-01-02 18:27:02 in .nl) in the PO> message with reference you PO> [ND] wrote (at least in part): ND>> Thanks for any confirmation or lack thereof. PO> Confirmed, th

Re: Voyager 3.95.06

2007-01-02 Thread Nick Danger
Reply to message sent 01/02/2007, @ 15:32:27 (2:32 PM Locally) ~~~ Hello Paul, > It is available at [Other Options]. See Attached. But are all the nested menus under there okay? For at least three of us they are out of sync with smart

Re[2]: Voyager 3.95.06

2007-01-02 Thread Paul Van Noord
1/2/2007 3:59 PM Hi Nick, On 1/2/2007 Nick Danger wrote: ND> But are all the nested menus under there okay? ND> For at least three of us they are out of sync with smart bat functions ND> missing. You are right, Character Sets dialog is missing and the others appear one below where they belong

Re[2]: Voyager 3.95.06

2007-01-02 Thread Paul Van Noord
1/2/2007 4:02 PM Hi Peter, On 1/2/2007 Peter Ouwehand wrote: PO> Hello Paul Van Noord, PO> on Tue, 2 Jan 2007 15:32:27 -0500 (2007-01-02 21:32:27 in .nl) in the PO> message with reference you PO> [PN] wrote (at least in part): PVN>> It is available at [Other Options]. See Attached. PO> I kn

Re[2]: Index problem with maintenance of big folders

2007-01-02 Thread NetVicious
martes, 2 ene 2007 at 02:09, it seems you wrote: N>> Ok. Well, I could say if the folder doesn't haves any deleted message N>> the maintenance run smoothly because there it's not any N>> purge+compresion needed. > You'd better read carefully. I copied almost 40.000 messages to my > test folder 39

Re: Voyager 3.95.06

2007-01-02 Thread Nick Danger
Reply to message sent 01/02/2007, @ 16:04:47 (3:04 PM Locally) ~~~ Hello Paul, > Confirmed. I never looked beyond seeing Updates had moved down to > other options but I agree it is the missing Updates entry that is the > cause. I couldn

Re[2]: Voyager 3.95.06

2007-01-02 Thread Paul Van Noord
1/2/2007 5:22 PM Hi Nick, On 1/2/2007 Nick Danger wrote: ND> https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=6158 ND> Hopefully I didn't botch protocol too awfully bad. Just added my .02. -- Take Care, Paul Voyager v.3.95.06 on Win2k SP4-Rollup1 5.0.2195 No IMAP OTFE

Re: Voyager 3.95.06

2007-01-02 Thread Maxim Masiutin
Hello Paul, Tuesday, January 02, 2007, 19:07:33, you wrote: >>I have been using this version of Voyager for several days and I want >>to thank you for an excellent release. It is very stable and >>performance is very good. I have not yet found anything that does not >>function flawlessly and quic

Re[2]: Voyager 3.95.06

2007-01-02 Thread Paul Van Noord
1/2/2007 5:45 PM Hi Maxim, On 1/2/2007 Maxim Masiutin wrote: MM> Thank you, we will take care of the bug MM> https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=6158 Thank You Very Much! -- Take Care, Paul Voyager v.3.95.06 on Win2k SP4-Rollup1 5.0.2195 No IMAP OTFE __