Re: 4.1.11.9

2009-04-05 Thread Christian Grams
Am 04.04.2009 23:51, schrieb Mark Partous: Oh no! Not yet another one! Are they breeding them in Germany? Hello Mark, no this is still the same person... and i will continue to argue against Ritlabs until they get their act together. They are worse than Microsoft in their software

Re: 4.1.11.9

2009-04-05 Thread Mackley
Up and running ... and happy birthday Marek Mikus ! You're in the headers too ! X-Mailer: The Bat! (v4.1.11.9 (MMB)) Professional -- Mackley Italy Current beta is 4.1.11.9 | 'Using TBBETA' information:

Re: 4.1.11.9

2009-04-05 Thread Alto Speckhardt
Hi, CG hhh... i was waiting for that all the time... how about getting IMAP CG to work properly instead of doing artwork!!?? MP Oh no! Not yet another one! Are they breeding them in Germany? No, they're breeding them in Moldova. Let's not confuse parties here: RIT is the one who have

Re: 4.1.11.9

2009-04-05 Thread George Μ . Menegakis
On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 03:41, MAU m...@rancho-k.com wrote: Hello Rick, Also the Attachments glyph now shows the NUMBER of attachments Not until you focus on the Message List pane for the first time and not for all messages. See attachment. And it doesn't work in any virtual folder.

Re: 4.1.11.9

2009-04-05 Thread Gleason Pace
George Ì. Menegakis menega...@gmail.com, On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 03:41, MAU m...@rancho-k.com wrote: Hello Rick, Also the Attachments glyph now shows the NUMBER of attachments Not until you focus on the Message List pane for the first time and not for all messages. See

Re: 4.1.11.9

2009-04-05 Thread MAU
Hello George, On the contrary I find it very useful provided it works correctly. In all folders and whether the focus is in the message list or not. That's why I say the feature should be *optional*, so those who like it and find it useful can use it and those who don't, like me, can block it.

Re: 4.1.11.9

2009-04-05 Thread Jens Franik
Samstag, 4. April 2009 at 23:51, Mark Partous wrote: Are they breeding them in Germany? Not always ;-) -- With kind Regards Jens Franik mailto:je...@gmx.de Picture of me? X-Rogue http://www.de2all.de/Kr_bat.jpg The Bat! 4.1.11.8 mit AntiSpamSniper 3.2.0.1 und Gaijin XMP Makro Plugin

[UR] 4.1.11.9

2009-04-05 Thread Jens Franik
Samstag, 4. April 2009 at 21:59, Maxim Masiutin wrote: The Bat! 4.1.11.9 (MMB) is available This beta version is devoted to Marek Mikus' birthday. We wish Marek all the best in the new year! Happy Birthday Marek, best wishes for you! Too poor my Birthday is to short time ahead to file in

Re: 4.1.11.9

2009-04-05 Thread Rick
Hello Rick, Also the Attachments glyph now shows the NUMBER of attachments Not until you focus on the Message List pane for the first time and not for all messages. See attachment. Anyway, I wish this new feature was optional. I don't like it neither with the default attachment glyph nor

Re: 4.1.11.9

2009-04-05 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Maxim, On Sat, 4 Apr 2009 22:59:54 +0300 GMT (05/Apr/09, 2:59 +0700 GMT), Maxim Masiutin wrote: MM This beta version is devoted to Marek Mikus' birthday. We wish Marek MM all the best in the new year! Congratulations, Marek! (Even if I am a day late. Please forgive me.) -- Cheers,

Re: 4.1.11.9

2009-04-05 Thread Jens Franik
Sonntag, 5. April 2009 at 19:33, Rick wrote: You are correct - it does not seem to work in virtual folders. I created a Virtual Folder in the Account under Inbox and it works, as soon as the Message List gets the first Focus on it. The count does not count Files Attached which are .txt - now

Re: 4.1.11.9

2009-04-05 Thread Roger Phillips
Hello Rick, R You are correct - it does not seem to work in virtual folders. It works OK here in virtual folders, but as far as I am able to check, only on messages received since about 26 September 2008!!! One of the messages in the folder does have to be in focus before the icon number

Number of Attachments (was: 4.1.11.9)

2009-04-05 Thread Volker Ahrendt
[Reply to: »MAU« · 2009-04-05 · 14:20 h (CET)] Moin, MAU! That's why I say the feature should be *optional*, so those who like it and find it useful can use it and those who don't, like me, can block it. +1 Cheers! VA - -- Direct eMail without [tbb] in subject line will end in Nirvana! QA

Re: 4.1.11.9

2009-04-05 Thread Volker Ahrendt
[Reply to: »Christian Grams« · 2009-04-04 · 23:29 h (CET)] Moin, Christian! hhh... i was waiting for that all the time... how about getting IMAP to work properly instead of doing artwork!!?? Maybe because Graphic Designers are just poor Software Developers?! Or are you seriously thinking,

Delayed Clock icon in Outbox not changed when unchecked

2009-04-05 Thread Marek Mikus
Hello, in Outbox, hourglass icon for standard outgoing messages can be removed to avoid sending it. But new clock icon for delayed messages stays unchanged when I click on it, even Outbox folder became unbolded. I understand this, icon can not be removed, but it should be changed to grey for

Re: 4.1.11.9

2009-04-05 Thread Christian Grams
Am 05.04.2009 21:04, schrieb Volker Ahrendt: Maybe because Graphic Designers are just poor Software Developers?! Or are you seriously thinking, that Max, Stef, etc. are doing the Icon Design, too? Take a look at the credits section. :-) Cheers! VA I don´t care actually who is doing what.

Re: 4.1.11.9

2009-04-05 Thread Rick
Sonntag, 5. April 2009 at 19:33, Rick wrote: You are correct - it does not seem to work in virtual folders. I created a Virtual Folder in the Account under Inbox and it works, as soon as the Message List gets the first Focus on it. The count does not count Files Attached which are .txt -

Re: 4.1.11.9

2009-04-05 Thread Gleason Pace
Christian Grams, Convince me and others that RITLABS is actually doing something about this. Give us a road map with proper content and uphold this road map. Why work on a broad front ? Work on one MAJOR problem and get it fixed - BEFORE you do silly aditions that have no functionality -

Re: 4.1.11.9 Delayed Messages

2009-04-05 Thread Jens Franik
Samstag, 4. April 2009 at 21:59, Maxim Masiutin wrote: The Bat! 4.1.11.9 Choosing delayed with User Defined Creation Time, the Sending Time can not be after the creation time. Then clicking on upper Fields Custom Sending Time, the Time now can set above and shows correct in the Field down at

Re: 4.1.11.9

2009-04-05 Thread Jens Franik
Sonntag, 5. April 2009 at 22:28, Rick wrote: Maybe you could describe, what does not work @you? It is a virtual folder that is not working correctly anyway. It points to several out boxes Are you talking about IMAP or POP? -- With kind Regards Jens Franik mailto:je...@gmx.de Picture of

Re: 4.1.11.9

2009-04-05 Thread Rick
Sonntag, 5. April 2009 at 22:28, Rick wrote: Maybe you could describe, what does not work @you? It is a virtual folder that is not working correctly anyway. It points to several out boxes Are you talking about IMAP or POP? POP -- Rick It is a good rule in life never to apologize. The

Re: 4.1.11.9

2009-04-05 Thread Jens Franik
Sonntag, 5. April 2009 at 23:49, Rick wrote: Maybe you could describe, what does not work @you? It is a virtual folder that is not working correctly anyway. It points to several out boxes Are you talking about IMAP or POP? POP Ok, well i have Common Virtual Folders for all Inbox,

Re: 4.1.11.9 Delayed Messages

2009-04-05 Thread Jens Franik
Sonntag, 5. April 2009 at 23:15, Jens Franik wrote: Choosing delayed with User Defined Creation Time, the Sending Time can not be after the creation time. After sending, the Message with creation Time 18:00:00 show up as: Sonntag, 5. April 2009, 23:15:00 (Sun, 5 Apr 2009 23:15:00 +0200) in

Re: 4.1.11.9 Delayed Messages

2009-04-05 Thread Rick
Sonntag, 5. April 2009 at 23:15, Jens Franik wrote: Choosing delayed with User Defined Creation Time, the Sending Time can not be after the creation time. After sending, the Message with creation Time 18:00:00 show up as: Sonntag, 5. April 2009, 23:15:00 (Sun, 5 Apr 2009 23:15:00 +0200)

Re: 4.1.11.9 Delayed Messages

2009-04-05 Thread Marek Mikus
Hello all, Monday, April 6, 2009, Rick wrote: I retried some things that were in the bug tracker as regards the delayed message feature. I don't think they fixed anything in this build although the issues HAVE been assigned. You can check BT to see, these reports are still opened, so they

Re: 4.1.11.9 Delayed Messages

2009-04-05 Thread Rick
Hello all, Monday, April 6, 2009, Rick wrote: I retried some things that were in the bug tracker as regards the delayed message feature. I don't think they fixed anything in this build although the issues HAVE been assigned. You can check BT to see, these reports are still opened, so they