Hello Paul,
Sunday, February 7, 2010, 11:18:32 PM, you wrote:
PVN They _did_ send a link. It is in the first line of the message.
I must be looking over it...
I suppose you are not referring to the Return-Path in the header, nor
the !DOCTYPE or If you cannot view this
enews=letter,
2/8/2010 6:57 AM
Hi Thomas,
On 2/7/2010 Thomas Fernandez wrote:
TF We covered the discussion whether emails should be in HTML in the last
TF century. Let's accept the fact that we cannot change the world and
TF work on a solution for TheBat!.
Do you want TB to use IE to render HTML like so
Hello Paul,
On Mon, 8 Feb 2010 07:03:27 -0500 GMT (08/Feb/10, 19:03 PM +0700 GMT),
Paul Van Noord wrote:
TF We covered the discussion whether emails should be in HTML in the last
TF century. Let's accept the fact that we cannot change the world and
TF work on a solution for TheBat!.
PVN Do you
Hello all,
Saturday, February 6, 2010, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
MM What's new in 4.2.33.7 since 4.2.33.5:
MM [*] Completely rewritten HTML display code to address issues related
MM to utf-8. Although this version is taged beta, it may really be
MM pre-alpha when it comes to HTML
Hello Marek,
On Mon, 8 Feb 2010 15:15:24 +0100 GMT (08/Feb/10, 21:15 PM +0700 GMT),
Marek Mikus wrote:
MM What's new in 4.2.33.7 since 4.2.33.5:
MM [*] Completely rewritten HTML display code to address issues related
MM to utf-8. Although this version is taged beta, it may really be
MM
Hello all,
Monday, February 8, 2010, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
MM is there a UTF-8 problem in this message?
I don't know what causes the problem.
I see no charset problem, it is written in English.
MM what is bad?
The display. Please compare displaying it in TB! with clicking on the
Hello Marek,
On Mon, 8 Feb 2010 16:08:01 +0100 GMT (08/Feb/10, 22:08 PM +0700 GMT),
Marek Mikus wrote:
MM is there a UTF-8 problem in this message?
I don't know what causes the problem.
MM I see no charset problem, it is written in English.
OK.
MM what is bad?
The display. Please compare
Hello all,
Monday, February 8, 2010, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
MM there were changes in code for addressing charset problems, this is a
MM completely different area.
Hm. The result is still not satisfactory. Maybe the developers must
look further than charsets?
as I expect, they will work on
Hello Marek,
On Mon, 8 Feb 2010 16:34:16 +0100 GMT (08/Feb/10, 22:34 PM +0700 GMT),
Marek Mikus wrote:
Hm. The result is still not satisfactory. Maybe the developers must
look further than charsets?
MM as I expect, they will work on it, but different developer and different
MM time. As i
Hello all,
Monday, February 8, 2010, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
Well, I am used to results rather than excuses. Sorry for coming from
the international part of the world.
In other words, I want to *use* this email client rather than be
informed why I can't properly read emails, or who is in
February 8, 2010
A group of e-mail scheduled at various times this morning did not go
out at all.
Some red faces here in the office.
This is the first time I've run into this problem.
Any one else?
Running Beta 4.2.33.7 on Windows 7, 32 Bit.
Jerry
--
Ethan J Mings
February 8, 2010
A group of e-mail scheduled at various times this morning did not go
out at all.
Some red faces here in the office.
This is the first time I've run into this problem.
Any one else?
It been flakey for a long time. It will stop for no reason although I am
Hello Marek,
On Mon, 8 Feb 2010 17:21:32 +0100 GMT (08/Feb/10, 23:21 PM +0700 GMT),
Marek Mikus wrote:
In other words, I want to *use* this email client rather than be
informed why I can't properly read emails, or who is in charge. It's
all one company and one product. Get it done or die
A group of e-mail scheduled at various times this morning did not
go out at all. Some red faces here in the office.
Solution/to learn: dont use beta version for important things.
Current beta is 4.2.33.7 | 'Using TBBETA'
14 matches
Mail list logo
