> Hello Jernej,
> On Thu, 30 Sep 2010 20:10:19 +0200 GMT (01/Oct/10, 1:10 AM +0700 GMT),
> Jernej Simončič wrote:
>>> It shouldn't be in the settings but a prompt when the connection is
>>> made. Simply prompt if one wants to accept the certificate or not.
>>> If you want a setting, just make one
Hello Jernej,
On Thu, 30 Sep 2010 20:10:19 +0200 GMT (01/Oct/10, 1:10 AM +0700 GMT),
Jernej Simončič wrote:
>> It shouldn't be in the settings but a prompt when the connection is
>> made. Simply prompt if one wants to accept the certificate or not.
>> If you want a setting, just make one where yo
On Thursday, September 30, 2010, 15:34:25, Adrian wrote:
> It shouldn't be in the settings but a prompt when the connection is
> made. Simply prompt if one wants to accept the certificate or not.
> If you want a setting, just make one where you can choose the default
> action (only prompt/reject,
Hello Maxim,
On Wed, 29 Sep 2010 18:09:36 +0300 GMT (29/Sep/10, 22:09 PM +0700 GMT),
Maxim Masiutin wrote:
MM> You can use stunnel (www.stunnel.org) to send your message.
Of course I won't do suich a thing. I want an email client with which
I can send messages without having to install second
Am 30.09.2010 15:12, schrieb Maxim Masiutin:
By default, the user is not allowed to run files with exe,
> pif, etc. extensions. But he has the right to modify that list in the
> Settings.
Do you recommend a somewhat deeply buried option in the settings to
allow bad certificates?
Make an
9/30/2010 10:48 AM
Hi Dierk,
On 9/30/2010 Dierk Haasis wrote:
>> Yes. Does not have to be deeply buried, should be in the Settings
>> somewhere.
DH> Don't make it such a permanent setting. It makes a lot more sense to
DH> have it as an option on the warning dialogue with a checkmark and OK
DH>
On Thursday, September 30, 2010, 2:31:13 PM, Vili wrote:
> If the certificate is bad, and the use of bad certificates
> are disabled, with a warning window point him where he can change
> that. Of course, by default, should not allow bad certificates. Also,
> even if the user enable the use of bad
By default, the user is not allowed to run files with exe,
pif, etc. extensions. But he has the right to modify that list in the
Settings.
>>> Do you recommend a somewhat deeply buried option in the settings to
>>> allow bad certificates?
>> Yes. Does not have to be deeply buried
9/30/2010 9:47 AM
Hi Vili,
On 9/30/2010 Vili wrote:
V> Yes. Does not have to be deeply buried, should be in the Settings
V> somewhere. If the certificate is bad, and the use of bad certificates
V> are disabled, with a warning window point him where he can change
V> that. Of course, by default,
It shouldn't be in the settings but a prompt when the connection is
made. Simply prompt if one wants to accept the certificate or not.
If you want a setting, just make one where you can choose the default
action (only prompt/reject, not "accept" so people don't auto-accept
all invalid certs).
>>>
Hello Vili!
On Thursday, September 30, 2010 at 3:31:13 PM you wrote:
> Yes. Does not have to be deeply buried, should be in the Settings
> somewhere.
Don't make it such a permanent setting. It makes a lot more sense to
have it as an option on the warning dialogue with a checkmark and OK
button.
>> By default, the user is not allowed to run files with exe,
>> pif, etc. extensions. But he has the right to modify that list in the
>> Settings.
> Do you recommend a somewhat deeply buried option in the settings to
> allow bad certificates?
Yes. Does not have to be deeply buried, should be
Hello Vili,
Wednesday, September 29, 2010, 7:40:28 PM, you wrote:
> By default, the user is not allowed to run files with exe,
> pif, etc. extensions. But he has the right to modify that list in the
> Settings.
Do you recommend a somewhat deeply buried option in the settings to
allow bad cert
13 matches
Mail list logo
