On Thursday 14 September 2000 Steve Lamb wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 14, 2000 at 08:18:52PM +0100, John Sullivan wrote:
>> It provides better data-type support
> How? It is just key/value pairs.
The values can be ints, strings, strings with environment variables,
string lists, bin
On Thursday 14 September 2000 A . Curtis Martin wrote:
> I don't think there's anyone really actively in favour of using the
> registry
I am!
It provides better data-type support, structured data storage,
per-user settings, access-control and more. Using the registry also
encourages good data/co
On Saturday 9 September 2000 A . Curtis Martin wrote:
> You mentioned that it fails to work. I'm clearing this up by indicating
> that it *does* work once you know what it really does. How it is
> implemented to work is a different matter.
Ah well, as we both seem to agree, even when you know wha
On Saturday 9 September 2000 A . Curtis Martin wrote:
> IOW's, if a message is from Stefan Tanurkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. Stefan
> Tanurkov will be displayed in the message list and this is all that
> you'll be able to use in the advanced filtering. It seems to filter the
> message list and not the
Using TB 1.46 Beta/5
I'm currently viewing my Bat Lists folder. The selection just happens
to be at the end of the list, which just happens to be a message from:
> Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2000 18:31:01 -0700
> From: Januk Aggarwal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Message-ID: <[EMAIL
On Friday 8 September 2000 Januk Aggarwal wrote:
> A quick question, do you filter all these subscriptions to individual
> folders? If you do, have you considered using folder level
> templates?
Yes and no. I filter to different folders based on the subject of the
list, but many lists usually
On Wednesday 2 August 2000 Steve Lamb wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 02, 2000 at 02:08:01PM +0200, Christopher J. Trybowski wrote:
>> You may type as well as (www.something.com), but
>> between [] it doesn't work...
> Generally because the accepted way of doing it doesn't include []'s. In
> fact,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 18 July 2000 Curtis wrote:
> Would you care to explain that. I use version 6.5.3 of PGP and I use
> S/MIME.
I don't doubt. As I said, I *could* have the wrong end of the stick
completely. (I am using 6.0, not 6.5, though. I don't know what
On Thursday 2 December 1999 Leif Gregory wrote:
> I agree with you Claudius about people preferring (although naively)
> ZIP over RAR. It's the same point I've made about people preferring
> Outlook or OE over TB. They want what they know, not what is the best.
Well, I have a couple of problems w
9 matches
Mail list logo
