Re: 3.51.4 - Strange display behaviour in Sorting Office

2005-07-20 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Peter, On Tue, 19 Jul 2005 20:08:37 +0200 GMT (20/07/2005, 01:08 +0700 GMT), Peter Meyns wrote: TF Thanks for digging that out. I should have sent a bugreport to BT. PM Done. https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4937 Thanks. I've added a note. -- Cheers, Thomas. Nennen Sie eine

Re: 3.51.4 - Strange display behaviour in Sorting Office

2005-07-19 Thread Peter Meyns
Hi Thomas, on Tue, 19 Jul 2005 09:14:43 +0700GMT (19.07.2005, 04:14 +0200GMT here), you wrote: TF On Mon, 18 Jul 2005 20:48:21 +0200 GMT (19/07/2005, 01:48 +0700 GMT), TF Peter Meyns wrote: TF I reported this with 3.0.1.33, but that's so long ago that the mid is TF not even in my message base

Re: 3.51.4 - Strange display behaviour in Sorting Office

2005-07-19 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Peter, On Tue, 19 Jul 2005 18:22:32 +0200 GMT (19/07/2005, 23:22 +0700 GMT), Peter Meyns wrote: PM Right. It is from October 2004, first on TBUDL, PM mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], later forwarded to TBBeta, PM mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks for digging that out. I should have sent a bugreport to

Re: 3.51.4 - Strange display behaviour in Sorting Office

2005-07-19 Thread Peter Meyns
Hi Thomas, on Tue, 19 Jul 2005 23:42:10 +0700GMT (19.07.2005, 18:42 +0200GMT here), you wrote: PM mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], later forwarded to TBBeta, PM mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TF Thanks for digging that out. I should have sent a bugreport to BT. This can and should still be done. I'm going to

Re: 3.51.4 - Strange display behaviour in Sorting Office

2005-07-19 Thread Peter Meyns
Hi Thomas, on Tue, 19 Jul 2005 23:42:10 +0700GMT, you wrote: TF Thanks for digging that out. I should have sent a bugreport to BT. Done. https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4937 -- Cheers Peter The Bat! v3.51.4 :beta: on Win2K, SP4, 5, 0, build 2195, Dell Latitude C600 P3 at 1002 MHz, 512

Re: 3.51.4 - Strange display behaviour in Sorting Office

2005-07-18 Thread Natasha V Pearce
Hi Ian I have noticed some strange behaviour when entering conditions that exceed the available space in the Sorting Office. When you add a condition it appears at the bottom, but try and change anything and it goes through a weird redisplay with the condition being edited off the bottom

Re: 3.51.4 - Strange display behaviour in Sorting Office

2005-07-18 Thread Peter Meyns
Hi Ian, on Mon, 18 Jul 2005 18:10:18 +1000GMT (18.07.2005, 10:10 +0200GMT here), you wrote: IAW I have noticed some strange behaviour when entering conditions that IAW exceed the available space in the Sorting Office. When you add a IAW condition it appears at the bottom, but try and change

Re: 3.51.4 - Strange display behaviour in Sorting Office

2005-07-18 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Peter, On Mon, 18 Jul 2005 18:02:32 +0200 GMT (18/07/2005, 23:02 +0700 GMT), Peter Meyns wrote: IAW I have noticed some strange behaviour when entering conditions that IAW exceed the available space in the Sorting Office. When you add a IAW condition it appears at the bottom, but try and

Re: 3.51.4 - Strange display behaviour in Sorting Office

2005-07-18 Thread Peter Meyns
Hi Thomas, on Mon, 18 Jul 2005 23:35:12 +0700GMT (18.07.2005, 18:35 +0200GMT here), you wrote: TF On Mon, 18 Jul 2005 18:02:32 +0200 GMT (18/07/2005, 23:02 +0700 GMT), TF Peter Meyns wrote: IAW I have noticed some strange behaviour when entering conditions that IAW exceed the available space

Re[2]: 3.51.4 - Strange display behaviour in Sorting Office

2005-07-18 Thread Cees
Het was op maandag 18 juli 2005 om 20:48 uur dat jij iets schreef over '3.51.4 - Strange display behaviour in Sorting Office' : Hoi Peter, PM If I had the time, I'd search in my archive. But not today. Anyway, do PM you remember the subject? I can't read :p -- groeten, Cees Feel

Re: 3.51.4 - Strange display behaviour in Sorting Office

2005-07-18 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Peter, On Mon, 18 Jul 2005 20:48:21 +0200 GMT (19/07/2005, 01:48 +0700 GMT), Peter Meyns wrote: TF I reported this with 3.0.1.33, but that's so long ago that the mid is TF not even in my message base any more. PM If I had the time, I'd search in my archive. But not today. Anyway, do PM