On Wednesday, January 18, 2006 @ 4:00:30 AM [-0700], Curtis wrote:
> Matt... I thought you would be one of those still slugging it out. :)
Normally I would be but my job has become more virtual so I don't need to
travel as much
anymore. I'm in front of my primary workstation enough to use POP.
On Wednesday, January 18, 2006, 6:00:30 AM, Curtis wrote:
> I'd sooner leave TB! than switch back to POP. The advantages that
> IMAP offers to me far outweigh the advantages that POP and TB!
> offers.
couldn't agree more.
> TB! is working pretty well here now. The last problem I reported where
>
On 18/1/2006 at 1:45:54 AM [GMT -0500], Matt Thoene wrote:
> I ran about 4 or 5 IMAP accounts with TB for about a year. It got too
> unstable and I've since converted them all back to POP accounts and am
> loving TB again. If they could get IMAP solved...wow. This would be
> one hell of an email c
On Monday, January 16, 2006 @ 10:30:49 PM [-0700], Clive Taylor wrote:
> Stuart
>> Just in case anyone was still interested, IMAP problems are still
>> plentiful in this version
> The reality is that I don't think anyone IS interested any more. The
> majority of serious IMAP users seem to
Hello.
Here's what Clive <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> typed
on Tuesday, January 17, 2006 06:30 +:
The reality is that I don't think anyone IS interested any more. The
majority of serious IMAP users seem to have vanished from this list and
Ritlabs has not carried through its promise to "concentrate
Peter,
SC>> Just in case anyone was still interested, IMAP problems are
SC>> still plentiful in this version.
Recent work on imap filters makes me think somebody is interested.
SC>> 1) Folder counts do not add up.
Yes.
SC>> 2) Still get duplicates regularly.
Not confirmed.
SC>>
Stuart,
On 16-01-2006 22:30, you [SC] wrote in
:
SC> Just in case anyone was still interested, IMAP problems are
SC> still plentiful in this version.
SC> 1) Folder counts do not add up.
SC> 2) Still get duplicates regularly.
SC> 3) Still get blank screens when moving from folder to f
Hallo oldfat,
On Tue, 17 Jan 2006 01:19:41 -0600GMT (17-1-2006, 8:19 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
O> Hello Clive,
Note: This moderator's interjection is a note to all readers and not
just to the person being replied to, even if their post may have
instigated this reply. Please don't feel si
Hello Clive,
Tuesday, January 17, 2006, 12:30:49 AM, you wrote:
>
Current beta is (none) | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
h
Stuart
Just in case anyone was still interested, IMAP problems are still
plentiful in this version
The reality is that I don't think anyone IS interested any more. The
majority of serious IMAP users seem to have vanished from this list and
Ritlabs has not carried through its promise to
Hello tbbeta,
Just in case anyone was still interested, IMAP problems are still
plentiful in this version.
1) Folder counts do not add up.
2) Still get duplicates regularly.
3) Still get blank screens when moving from folder to folder.
On the bright side
1) Filtering seems to b
11 matches
Mail list logo