Re: 3.65.03 - IMAP

2006-01-19 Thread Matt Thoene
On Wednesday, January 18, 2006 @ 4:00:30 AM [-0700], Curtis wrote: > Matt... I thought you would be one of those still slugging it out. :) Normally I would be but my job has become more virtual so I don't need to travel as much anymore. I'm in front of my primary workstation enough to use POP.

Re: 3.65.03 - IMAP

2006-01-18 Thread Dwight A Corrin
On Wednesday, January 18, 2006, 6:00:30 AM, Curtis wrote: > I'd sooner leave TB! than switch back to POP. The advantages that > IMAP offers to me far outweigh the advantages that POP and TB! > offers. couldn't agree more. > TB! is working pretty well here now. The last problem I reported where >

Re: 3.65.03 - IMAP

2006-01-18 Thread Curtis
On 18/1/2006 at 1:45:54 AM [GMT -0500], Matt Thoene wrote: > I ran about 4 or 5 IMAP accounts with TB for about a year. It got too > unstable and I've since converted them all back to POP accounts and am > loving TB again. If they could get IMAP solved...wow. This would be > one hell of an email c

Re: 3.65.03 - IMAP

2006-01-17 Thread Matt Thoene
On Monday, January 16, 2006 @ 10:30:49 PM [-0700], Clive Taylor wrote: > Stuart >> Just in case anyone was still interested, IMAP problems are still >> plentiful in this version > The reality is that I don't think anyone IS interested any more. The > majority of serious IMAP users seem to

Re: 3.65.03 - IMAP

2006-01-17 Thread Randy
Hello. Here's what Clive <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> typed on Tuesday, January 17, 2006 06:30 +: The reality is that I don't think anyone IS interested any more. The majority of serious IMAP users seem to have vanished from this list and Ritlabs has not carried through its promise to "concentrate

Re[2]: 3.65.03 - IMAP

2006-01-17 Thread Gleason Pace
Peter, SC>> Just in case anyone was still interested, IMAP problems are SC>> still plentiful in this version. Recent work on imap filters makes me think somebody is interested. SC>> 1) Folder counts do not add up. Yes. SC>> 2) Still get duplicates regularly. Not confirmed. SC>>

Re: 3.65.03 - IMAP

2006-01-17 Thread Peter Fjelsten
Stuart, On 16-01-2006 22:30, you [SC] wrote in : SC> Just in case anyone was still interested, IMAP problems are SC> still plentiful in this version. SC> 1) Folder counts do not add up. SC> 2) Still get duplicates regularly. SC> 3) Still get blank screens when moving from folder to f

Mod: HTML use (was: 3.65.03 - IMAP)

2006-01-17 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo oldfat, On Tue, 17 Jan 2006 01:19:41 -0600GMT (17-1-2006, 8:19 +0200, where I live), you wrote: O> Hello Clive, Note: This moderator's interjection is a note to all readers and not just to the person being replied to, even if their post may have instigated this reply. Please don't feel si

Re[2]: 3.65.03 - IMAP

2006-01-16 Thread oldfat
Hello Clive, Tuesday, January 17, 2006, 12:30:49 AM, you wrote: > Current beta is (none) | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - h

Re: 3.65.03 - IMAP

2006-01-16 Thread Clive Taylor
Stuart Just in case anyone was still interested, IMAP problems are still plentiful in this version The reality is that I don't think anyone IS interested any more. The majority of serious IMAP users seem to have vanished from this list and Ritlabs has not carried through its promise to

3.65.03 - IMAP

2006-01-16 Thread Stuart Cuddy
Hello tbbeta, Just in case anyone was still interested, IMAP problems are still plentiful in this version. 1) Folder counts do not add up. 2) Still get duplicates regularly. 3) Still get blank screens when moving from folder to folder. On the bright side 1) Filtering seems to b