Hello MAU,
On Wed, 27 Dec 2006 19:42:01 +0100 GMT (28/12/2006, 01:42 +0700 GMT),
MAU wrote:
>> https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=6149
M> Been there and confirmed.
Thanks. I can confirm with 3.95.6 now as well.
--
Cheers,
Thomas.
This being Easter Sunday, we will ask Mrs. Lewis to come
Hello Thomas,
>>> Can you confirm with 3.95.6, which you are using?
>
M>> Yes.
>
> https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=6149
Been there and confirmed.
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v3.95.6 on Windows XP 5.1 Service Pack 2
___
Hello MAU,
On Wed, 27 Dec 2006 18:51:27 +0100 GMT (28/12/2006, 00:51 +0700 GMT),
MAU wrote:
>> Can you confirm with 3.95.6, which you are using?
M> Yes.
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=6149
--
Cheers,
Thomas.
Who was the first person to look at a cow and say," I think I'll
squeeze th
Hello Thomas,
> Can you confirm with 3.95.6, which you are using?
Yes.
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v3.95.6 on Windows XP 5.1 Service Pack 2
Current beta is 3.95.05 | 'Using TBBETA' informatio
Hello MAU,
On Wed, 27 Dec 2006 18:34:14 +0100 GMT (28/12/2006, 00:34 +0700 GMT),
MAU wrote:
>> That XLAT table is indeed included in the current version, but the
>> problem persists. See attached message.
M> Please define 'current version'. You sig shows 3.95.3.
Yes. That's the Christmas Releas
Hello Thomas,
> That XLAT table is indeed included in the current version, but the
> problem persists. See attached message.
Please define 'current version'. You sig shows 3.95.3.
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v3.95.6 on Windows XP 5.1 Service Pack 2
Hello TBBETA,
On Sun, 19 Nov 2006 20:02:51 +0700 GMT (19/11/2006, 20:02 +0700 GMT),
Thomas Fernandez wrote:
>>> Now, where do I download the missing XLAT table from, and will it be
>>> integrated already in the next TB! version?
M>> All I know is in my
TF> I understand. I couldn't find that XL
Hello Vili,
On Sun, 19 Nov 2006 14:03:44 +0100 GMT (19/11/2006, 20:03 +0700 GMT),
Vili wrote:
>> Now, where do I download the missing XLAT table from, and will it be
>> integrated already in the next TB! version?
V> It is already integrated.
Not in the version I am using, but thanks for the goo
Hello MAU,
On Sun, 19 Nov 2006 12:18:56 +0100 GMT (19/11/2006, 18:18 +0700 GMT),
MAU wrote:
>> Now, where do I download the missing XLAT table from, and will it be
>> integrated already in the next TB! version?
M> All I know is in my
I understand. I couldn't find that XLAT table ks_c_5601-1987
Hello Thomas,
>>> My guess is the XLAT-table, but I may be wrong.
M>> You guessed right. See
> Yes, I saw that after I posted my message.
> Now, where do I download the missing XLAT table from, and will it be
> integrated already in the next TB! version?
It is already integrated.
--
Vili
The B
Hello Thomas,
> Now, where do I download the missing XLAT table from, and will it be
> integrated already in the next TB! version?
All I know is in my
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v3.85.03 on Windows XP 5.1 Service Pack 2
___
Hello MAU,
On Sat, 18 Nov 2006 18:53:12 +0100 GMT (19/11/2006, 00:53 +0700 GMT),
MAU wrote:
>> My guess is the XLAT-table, but I may be wrong.
M> You guessed right. See
Yes, I saw that after I posted my message.
Now, where do I download the missing XLAT table from, and will it be
integrated a
Hello Alexander,
>>> (try to reply to it, my editor opens with a most w3ird font)
>
>> You mean like in attached?
>
> Hmmm no, mine looks different. Might depend on the type of fonts that
> are installed on your system. The TO header contains some asian double
> byte characters here (at least that
Hello Thomas,
> My guess is the XLAT-table, but I may be wrong.
You guessed right. See
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v3.85.03 on Windows XP 5.1 Service Pack 2
Current ALPHA is 3.86.05 | 'Using
Hello Roelof,
>>> I guess they're Korean characters in stead of Chinese, as
>>> ks_c_5601-1987 is supposed to be a Korean codepage.
>
V>> If you add the specific codepage in the XLAT table, it should display
V>> correctly.
>
> And how do I do that?
Options/Preferences/Other Options/Character sets
Hello MAU & everyone else,
on 18-Nov-2006 at 14:55 you (MAU) wrote:
>> (try to reply to it, my editor opens with a most w3ird font)
> You mean like in attached?
Hmmm no, mine looks different. Might depend on the type of fonts that
are installed on your system. The TO header contains some asian
Hallo Vili,
On Sat, 18 Nov 2006 16:25:50 +0100GMT (18-11-2006, 16:25 , where I
live), you wrote:
>> I guess they're Korean characters in stead of Chinese, as
>> ks_c_5601-1987 is supposed to be a Korean codepage.
V> If you add the specific codepage in the XLAT table, it should display
V> correct
Hello MAU,
On Sat, 18 Nov 2006 15:53:04 +0100 GMT (18/11/2006, 21:53 +0700 GMT),
MAU wrote:
>> Workaround: Right-click in the message, choose Character Set / Western
>> European. Works also with the message that MAU forwarded. This is not
>> a solution, but it may give a hint where to look.
M> I
Hello Vili,
M>>> Do you see the same problem if you open it in your TB?
>> Confirmed, though I don't see the squares you mention.
>> Over here I see Chinese characters (or something alike), but those are
>> displayed in the message list too.
>> Both the plain text and the HTML part of the message
Hello Roelof,
M>> Do you see the same problem if you open it in your TB?
> Confirmed, though I don't see the squares you mention.
> Over here I see Chinese characters (or something alike), but those are
> displayed in the message list too.
> Both the plain text and the HTML part of the message hav
Hello Thomas,
> Workaround: Right-click in the message, choose Character Set / Western
> European. Works also with the message that MAU forwarded. This is not
> a solution, but it may give a hint where to look.
>
If I do that, headers are now displayed correctly on Header Pane but
_incorrectlty_
Hello Roelof,
>>> (try to reply to it, my editor opens with a most w3ird font)
M>> You mean like in attached?
>
> No, more like attached.
I see. Yes, I guess that may depend on installed fonts.
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v3.85.03 on Windows XP 5.1 Ser
Hello Roelof,
M>> Do you see the same problem if you open it in your TB?
>
> Confirmed, though I don't see the squares you mention.
> Over here I see Chinese characters (or something alike), but those are
> displayed in the message list too.
I guess that may depend on installed fonts/character se
Hello Roelof,
On Sat, 18 Nov 2006 14:56:04 +0100 GMT (18/11/2006, 20:56 +0700 GMT),
Roelof Otten wrote:
M>> Do you see the same problem if you open it in your TB?
RO> Confirmed, though I don't see the squares you mention.
RO> Over here I see Chinese characters (or something alike), but those are
Hallo Miguel,
On Sat, 18 Nov 2006 14:55:26 +0100GMT (18-11-2006, 14:55 , where I
live), you wrote:
>> (try to reply to it, my editor opens with a most w3ird font)
M> You mean like in attached?
No, more like attached.
--
Groetjes, Roelof
"Welcome to Hell. Here's your copy of Windows95." - Sata
Hallo Miguel,
On Sat, 18 Nov 2006 14:05:24 +0100GMT (18-11-2006, 14:05 , where I
live), you wrote:
M> Do you see the same problem if you open it in your TB?
Confirmed, though I don't see the squares you mention.
Over here I see Chinese characters (or something alike), but those are
displayed in
Hello Alexander,
>> Do you see the same problem if you open it in your TB?
>
> Yes.
I'm glad I'm not alone :)
> Must have to do with the charset="ks_c_5601-1987" in the original
> message
But that's for the HTML body, isn't it?
Anyway, why do headers display correctly in message list and prev
Hello MAU & everyone else,
on 18-Nov-2006 at 14:05 you (MAU) wrote:
> Do you see the same problem if you open it in your TB?
Yes.
Must have to do with the charset="ks_c_5601-1987" in the original
message (try to reply to it, my editor opens with a most w3ird font).
--
Best regards,
Alexande
Hello all,
Please see attached the last message I received (spam) and that causes
the problem. Actually, the PNG screen grab previously sent if for this
message.
Do you see the same problem if you open it in your TB?
TIA.
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v
Hello all,
Every now and then, not very frequently, I receive a message (mostly
spam) where the headers in the Headers Pane are displayed as 'boxes'
while they are displayed correctly both on the Message List Pane and
Preview Pane. Please see attached PNG.
It is not new to this beta (alpha), rele
30 matches
Mail list logo
