Re[2]: 4.2.7.2 (Virusdetection of some Scanners - List of 16.07.2009 10:58 CET)

2009-07-16 Thread Maxim Masiutin
Hello Mackley, Thursday, July 16, 2009, 13:13:50, you wrote: >>Cracks for 4.2 version do not work... there are some leaked out >>working serials "out there" but maybe they will be blacklisted ;-) >>They must buy TheBat!, it's a good product not so expensive (see the >>MS Office Outlook cost...) J

Re: 4.2.7.2 (Virusdetection of some Scanners - List of 16.07.2009 10:58 CET)

2009-07-16 Thread Mackley
Martin wrote: > Why Ritlabs is doing that is not completely clear for me. If it is > because of piracy it may make sense. Yes, it's anti-piracy strategy. Cracks for 4.2 version do not work... there are some leaked out working serials "out there" but maybe they will be blacklisted ;-) They must b

Re: 4.2.7.2 (Virusdetection of some Scanners - List of 16.07.2009 10:58 CET)

2009-07-16 Thread mse
Hello Martin, > Hello folks, > as you all seem to be worried about the Virus detection in "the_bat.exe" > I was running a check on www.virustotal.com with the following result > (due to format I have to post in HTML). > File tb4272.rar received on 2009.07.16 09:02:27 (UTC) > Result: 5/41 (12.

Re: 4.2.7.2 (Virusdetection of some Scanners - List of 16.07.2009 10:58 CET)

2009-07-16 Thread Martin Schneider
Hello folks, as you all seem to be worried about the Virus detection in "the_bat.exe" I was running a check on www.virustotal.com with the following result (due to format I have to post in HTML). File tb4272.rar received on 2009.07.16 09:02:27 (UTC) Result: 5/41 (12.2%) Email: Antivirus V